Uncyclopedia:Pee Review/Bilton Mabbitt
Jump to navigation
Jump to search
Milton Babbitt
Shabidoo reviewed the main page, this time I'd like reviews of the talk and the hidden rewrite that Milton doesn't care whether you read or not, too. Thank ya kindly! --
TKFU
UUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUCK 
00:36, March 13, 2011 (UTC)
- I'll take this one! -- Lost Labyrinth
• (t) • (c) • (a) 10:10, March 13, 2011 (UTC)
| Humour: | 7 | The rewrite isn't as good as the original version but there are still some funny moments and the same goes for the talk page. I found the "wtf is this" guy to be quite amusing as he fails to understand the point of the article. For the rewrite, I would try to add a few more jokes and maybe some quotes to maintain the humour of the article. But overall, not bad. |
| Concept: | 8 | The talk page is...just a talk page with added humour and that's fine. The rewrite appears to be encyclopedic yet it is still pretty funny. While it is different to the normal version, it still comes out pretty well in the concept department. |
| Prose and formatting: | 10 | The spelling and grammar is steller, so no complaints there. All of the images suit their purpose for the article on both the rewrite and the talk page. Overall, no complaints for prose and formatting. |
| Images: | 10 | Like I mentioned above, they suit their purpose pretty well for the article and even though you could add a bit more humour into the images, they are fine as they are. |
| Miscellaneous: | 8 | My overall grade of the article. |
| Final Score: | 43 | While the humour does need to be built on a little bit, the majority of the rewrite and the talk page are done pretty well and they are both looking very promising. It isn't a n00b-ish effort so you don't need to go back to the books here but I would just slightly build on the humour. Overall, a good article! Good luck with any improvements you may wish to make! |
| Reviewer: | -- Lost Labyrinth  • (t) • (c) • (a) 10:25, March 13, 2011 (UTC)
| |