Uncyclopedia:Votes for deletion/archive172

From Uncyclopedia, the content-free encyclopedia
Jump to navigation Jump to search

Smex

Keep
Delete
Comments

Shiznit

Keep
Delete
Comments
  • That's why it's best not to comment on UU's mum... MrN MrN9000SouthParksmall.jpg 20:18, Feb 12
    Huh? --UU - natter UU Manhole.gif 20:36, Feb 12
    "Stubby 2005cruft thing with pretty much no edits since, no links to it and no point. And it's shite" *shudder* ;) MrN MrN9000SouthParksmall.jpg 21:24, Feb 12

Anderson "The Spider" Silva

Keep
Delete
Comments

Arthur Read

Keep
Delete
Comments
  • Comment - Since it is tagged with {{Ugly}} - should this be here?--Sycamore (Talk) 17:16, 12 February 2009 (UTC)

The Free Advice Man

Keep
Delete
Comments

Template:Armageddon

Keep
Delete
  • Delete comment template, 10 times bigger than it needs to be. (Well, it would be if should exist in the first place) --Mnb'z 07:09, 11 February 2009 (UTC)
  • Delete. Wayyy too big. And pointless. And as I may have observed before, I'm happy to see the back of pointless templates. --UU - natter UU Manhole.gif 11:38, Feb 11
  • Symbol delete vote.svg Destroy this template! Before it destroys us! -Sockpuppet of an unregistered user 12:03, 11 February 2009 (UTC)
  • AHH!!! --Aljolson.jpg Hi, hey! I'M A MOTERFUCKING NIGGER BITCH LOVER Aljolson.jpg 20:59, 11 February 2009 (UTC)
  • Delete. MrN MrN9000SouthParksmall.jpg 23:11, Feb 11
Comments

Template:Gaylevel

Keep
Delete
Comments

Template:La Liga

Keep
Delete
Comments

Thomas Bayley

Keep
Delete
  • Delete. Vanity. It's gotta be. And it's dull, unfunny vanity that has been here far too long. Get rid. --UU - natter UU Manhole.gif 14:04, Feb 11
  • Symbol delete vote.svg EXTERMINATE! -Sockpuppet of an unregistered user 14:09, 11 February 2009 (UTC)
  • Should be QVFD probably, since its vanity. --Mnb'z 17:06, 11 February 2009 (UTC)
  • Delete VFD is the correct place for this, not QVFD. We do allow some vanity, it just needs to be REALLY funny. This does not make the required grade. MrN MrN9000SouthParksmall.jpg 20:14, Feb 11
  • No comment. --Aljolson.jpg Hi, hey! I'M A MOTERFUCKING NIGGER BITCH LOVER Aljolson.jpg 20:48, 11 February 2009 (UTC)
Comments

The first 327 megatoads

Keep
Delete
  • Delete. This was created as an extension of a page called "Megatoad" which has since been deleted. It is the same damn picture repeated over and over with different names. And a paragraph or so of unfunny text at the start. Can it go? Please? --UU - natter UU Manhole.gif 12:12, Feb 11
  • Symbol delete vote.svg Delete.--Sycamore (Talk) 12:21, 11 February 2009 (UTC)
  • Symbol delete vote.svg EXTERMINATE! -Sockpuppet of an unregistered user 12:28, 11 February 2009 (UTC)
  • Symbol delete vote.svg Delete. --Mnb'z 17:06, 11 February 2009 (UTC)
  • Symbol delete vote.svg Delete.. I might vote to keep it if it hadn't lost its context when megatoad went away. Tinymasaru.gifpillow talk 19:57, 11 February 2009 (UTC)
Comments

VFD-padlock.png Template:Satan Approved

Keep
  • Keep. ~Jewriken.GIF 08:17, 11 February 2009 (UTC)
  • Keep. Per PP's comment last time. Many templates should die due to pointlessness, but this one is part of the charm of this site for some people, ugly thing though it may be. There are things out there more deserving of deletion. --UU - natter UU Manhole.gif 11:36, Feb 11
  • Keep the template, but do not worship Satan! Dame PPsigPPlips.gifGUN PotY WotM 2xPotM 17xVFH VFP Poo PMS •YAP• 14:07, 11 February 2009 (UTC)
  • Keep Well, we allow Jesus to have one, and we don't want to be accused of favouritism. MrN MrN9000SouthParksmall.jpg 20:11, Feb 11
Delete
  • Symbol delete vote.svg Delete. corny clutter. I'm sure Satan wouldn't approve of this template. --Mnb'z 05:37, 11 February 2009 (UTC)
  • Symbol delete vote.svg Delete. I'm Satan, and I don't approve of anything whatsoever.  c • > • cunwapquc? 08:11, 11 February 2009 (UTC)
Comments
  • It was on VFD before, but that was over 2 years ago. --Mnb'z 05:37, 11 February 2009 (UTC)
  • Conditional For. It should be changed a bit. For one thing, I don't like the image. -Sockpuppet of an unregistered user 12:22, 11 February 2009 (UTC)
  • Kept. --Littleboyonly.jpg TKFUJewriken.GIFUJewriken.GIFUJewriken.GIFUJewriken.GIFUJewriken.GIFUJewriken.GIFUJewriken.GIFUJewriken.GIFUJewriken.GIFUJewriken.GIFUJewriken.GIFUJewriken.GIFUJewriken.GIFUJewriken.GIFUJewriken.GIFUJewriken.GIFUJewriken.GIFUJewriken.GIFUJewriken.GIFUJewriken.GIFUUJewriken.GIFUJewriken.GIFUJewriken.GIFUJewriken.GIFUJewriken.GIFUJewriken.GIFUJewriken.GIFUJewriken.GIFUJewriken.GIFUJewriken.GIFUJewriken.GIFUJewriken.GIFUJewriken.GIFUJewriken.GIFUJewriken.GIFUJewriken.GIFUJewriken.GIFUJewriken.GIFUJewriken.GIFUJewriken.GIFUJewriken.GIFCK Oldmanonly.jpg 21:01, 11 February 2009 (UTC)

Template:Emperor of America

Keep
Delete
  • Symbol delete vote.svg Delete. bullshit succession list, that has fouled up several articles. Basically the little brother of the mythical presidents template. --Mnb'z 17:12, 10 February 2009 (UTC)
  • Go away dumb list. Go away! Tinymasaru.gifpillow talk 20:37, 10 February 2009 (UTC)
  • delete. i always hated this... SirGerrycheeversGunTalk 20:55, 10 February 2009 (UTC)
  • delete. MrN MrN9000SouthParksmall.jpg 11:25, Feb 11
  • Delete. Happy to see the back of pointless templates. --UU - natter UU Manhole.gif 11:29, Feb 11
  • Delete. We have enough of this stuff already. -Sockpuppet of an unregistered user 12:26, 11 February 2009 (UTC)
  • Delete This is the type of BS that drives me nutz. Dame PPsigPPlips.gifGUN PotY WotM 2xPotM 17xVFH VFP Poo PMS •YAP• 14:09, 11 February 2009 (UTC)
Comments

Template:Funny?

Keep
  • Semi-weak-somewhat-strong-but-not-in-the-middle keep We need one like this. plzplzplz? I'd help but all I can do is make the colour sexier. 8D (Oh yeah, by the way, my favourite colour is chartreuse. ._______.) 03:58, 7 February 2009 (UTC)
I nominated this for deletion because it is an insulting wanna-be rewrite/fix tag. If you find a page that this should go on, you should put a proper rewrite or fix tag on it. This one doesn't categorize the page its placed on, and it insults the reader. If the rewrite or fix tag doesn't give enough information, say something on the talk page.--Mnb'z 05:29, 7 February 2009 (UTC)
Delete
  • Symbol delete vote.svg Delete. wannabe maintenance tag that is a bit too insulting. This should be replaced by proper rewrite or fix tags. --Mnb'z 05:39, 6 February 2009 (UTC)
  • Symbol delete vote.svg Delete. Yuck. 23:05, 6 February 2009 (UTC)
  • Symbol delete vote.svg Delete. I can't think when this should be used. MrN MrN9000SouthParksmall.jpg 23:10, Feb 6
  • Symbol delete vote.svg Delete Per nom. He makes a good point. --Pleb- Sawblade5 [block me!] ( yell | FAQ | I did this ) 18:58, 7 February 2009 (UTC)
  • delete. bad templates = bad. SirGerrycheeversGunTalk 21:04, 9 February 2009 (UTC)
  • Bad colors --Littleboyonly.jpg TKFUJewriken.GIFUJewriken.GIFUJewriken.GIFUJewriken.GIFUJewriken.GIFUJewriken.GIFUJewriken.GIFUJewriken.GIFUJewriken.GIFUJewriken.GIFUJewriken.GIFUJewriken.GIFUJewriken.GIFUJewriken.GIFUJewriken.GIFUJewriken.GIFUJewriken.GIFUJewriken.GIFUJewriken.GIFUJewriken.GIFUUJewriken.GIFUJewriken.GIFUJewriken.GIFUJewriken.GIFUJewriken.GIFUJewriken.GIFUJewriken.GIFUJewriken.GIFUJewriken.GIFUJewriken.GIFUJewriken.GIFUJewriken.GIFUJewriken.GIFUJewriken.GIFUJewriken.GIFUJewriken.GIFUJewriken.GIFUJewriken.GIFUJewriken.GIFUJewriken.GIFUJewriken.GIFCK Oldmanonly.jpg 20:38, 10 February 2009 (UTC)
Comments

VFD-padlock.png White Nile

Keep
  • Keep Not all stubs are bad. MrN MrN9000SouthParksmall.jpg 16:00, Feb 6
  • It's keepable. -Sockpuppet of an unregistered user 23:08, 6 February 2009 (UTC)
  • weeeeeaaaaakkkk keep. just enough humor:length ratio for me. SirGerrycheeversGunTalk 21:03, 9 February 2009 (UTC)
  • Weak keep. Possible candidate for an expand tag? --UU - natter UU Manhole.gif 09:26, Feb 10
  • Keep. Just needs a few additions. I recommend this for a colonization, not an expansion, as the stuff that's currently there is good enough to not delete out of flagrant not-caringness. --Littleboyonly.jpg TKFUJewriken.GIFUJewriken.GIFUJewriken.GIFUJewriken.GIFUJewriken.GIFUJewriken.GIFUJewriken.GIFUJewriken.GIFUJewriken.GIFUJewriken.GIFUJewriken.GIFUJewriken.GIFUJewriken.GIFUJewriken.GIFUJewriken.GIFUJewriken.GIFUJewriken.GIFUJewriken.GIFUJewriken.GIFUJewriken.GIFUUJewriken.GIFUJewriken.GIFUJewriken.GIFUJewriken.GIFUJewriken.GIFUJewriken.GIFUJewriken.GIFUJewriken.GIFUJewriken.GIFUJewriken.GIFUJewriken.GIFUJewriken.GIFUJewriken.GIFUJewriken.GIFUJewriken.GIFUJewriken.GIFUJewriken.GIFUJewriken.GIFUJewriken.GIFUJewriken.GIFUJewriken.GIFCK Oldmanonly.jpg 20:40, 10 February 2009 (UTC)
Delete
Comments
  • This looks to stubby to keep, unless someone is planning on expanding it. Most of its size comes from the river and vfd templates. --Mnb'z 16:17, 6 February 2009 (UTC)
    • Size matters not. Look at me. Judge me by my size, do you?? It's been around since 2006, but never been vandalised. It's kinda funny, and not stupid. Most importantly... It's not going to stop anyone else from doing a better job if they want to. It's short, but not crap. Totally unlike my craps. MrN MrN9000SouthParksmall.jpg 23:09, Feb 6

Abstain per by bandwagon keepism. Although, I do worry about a stub this short being a "bad example" to noobs. --Mnb'z 06:01, 7 February 2009 (UTC)

Yea, I hear you on the bad example thing. That's the reason why I went on my short pages massacre last year. We really used to have some old short shit articles stinking up the place.... The thing is, we do allow stubs to be created (even now) we are just more strict about them. This article might have been ICUd or maybe {{expand}} if created now, but I would like to think it might have made it through our new article quality controls... I think probably my main reason for deciding to fight for this one is because its about a very notable subject. I just think we are better with with this kinda thing than not... MrN MrN9000SouthParksmall.jpg 13:22, Feb 7
  • Kept. ~Jewriken.GIF 08:27, 11 February 2009 (UTC)

Template:Noob Approved

Keep
Delete
  • Delete another unused template that survived QVFD. --Mnb'z 07:01, 10 February 2009 (UTC)
  • Delete. Complete gob of shite--DRStrangesig5.png Sherman.png Fingertalk.png  09:02, 10 February 2009 (UTC)
  • Delete. Happy to see the back of pointless templates. --UU - natter UU Manhole.gif 09:43, Feb 10
  • gross. SirGerrycheeversGunTalk 20:23, 10 February 2009 (UTC)
  • Delete. MrN MrN9000SouthParksmall.jpg 20:24, Feb 10
Comments

Criscomedia

Keep
Delete
  • Delete No idea, could be lots of things, but it's not good. MrN MrN9000SouthParksmall.jpg 00:33, Feb 10
  • Delete. Indeed, it's not good. Tinymasaru.gifpillow talk 06:02, 10 February 2009 (UTC)
  • Delete per above. --Mnb'z 06:53, 10 February 2009 (UTC)
  • Delete. Boy, was that an easy call. --UU - natter UU Manhole.gif 09:42, Feb 10
  • not delicious. SirGerrycheeversGunTalk 20:18, 10 February 2009 (UTC)
Comments

Rhodri the Great

Keep
Delete
  • Delete Oh Dear. MrN MrN9000SouthParksmall.jpg 00:25, Feb 10
  • Delete fails the notability standards by a wide margin, and random as hell. --Mnb'z 06:53, 10 February 2009 (UTC)
  • Delete. Listy, dull, and I really didn't see anything worthwhile in it. --UU - natter UU Manhole.gif 09:41, Feb 10
  • groan. SirGerrycheeversGunTalk 20:17, 10 February 2009 (UTC)
Comments
  • Abstain. It's a real person, and honestly, a little funny in places. Tinymasaru.gifpillow talk 06:01, 10 February 2009 (UTC)

VFD-padlock.png Is the bear a Catholic?

Keep
  • Keep "It's Not Such a Bad Little Article. Maybe all it needs is a little love. Please show this article some love by improving it" Does the bear shit in the woods? Is the Pope a catholic? MrN MrN9000SouthParksmall.jpg 13:08, Feb 8
  • Symbol keep vote.svg KEEP! -Sockpuppet of an unregistered user 13:13, 8 February 2009 (UTC)
  • Symbol keep vote.svg Keep. --Mnb'z 00:58, 9 February 2009 (UTC)
  • Keep. Improveabubble. --UU - natter UU Manhole.gif 09:40, Feb 10
  • keep. i will personally adopt this one. SirGerrycheeversGunTalk 20:15, 10 February 2009 (UTC)
Delete

Symbol delete vote.svg Delete.. Random stub. IronLung 08:41, 8 February 2009 (UTC)

Comments

VFD-padlock.png Democratic People's Republic of Mindanao

Keep
Delete
  • Symbol delete vote.svg Nom and Huff I fail to get the points of the jokes here if there's any, it appears to be a spork from another Encyclopedia. I also noted the Suguestion below and felt that it need to be voted on here. --Pleb- Sawblade5 [block me!] ( yell | FAQ | I did this ) 05:55, 8 February 2009 (UTC)
Comments
  • Abstain leaning toward delete This subject is rather obscure even though it is based on a real entity. I don't think it could be rewritten except by a native of the Philippines or someone with unusually high knowledge of the the subject. --Mnb'z 00:34, 9 February 2009 (UTC)
  • Kept --Littleboyonly.jpg TKFUJewriken.GIFUJewriken.GIFUJewriken.GIFUJewriken.GIFUJewriken.GIFUJewriken.GIFUJewriken.GIFUJewriken.GIFUJewriken.GIFUJewriken.GIFUJewriken.GIFUJewriken.GIFUJewriken.GIFUJewriken.GIFUJewriken.GIFUJewriken.GIFUJewriken.GIFUJewriken.GIFUJewriken.GIFUJewriken.GIFUUJewriken.GIFUJewriken.GIFUJewriken.GIFUJewriken.GIFUJewriken.GIFUJewriken.GIFUJewriken.GIFUJewriken.GIFUJewriken.GIFUJewriken.GIFUJewriken.GIFUJewriken.GIFUJewriken.GIFUJewriken.GIFUJewriken.GIFUJewriken.GIFUJewriken.GIFUJewriken.GIFUJewriken.GIFUJewriken.GIFUJewriken.GIFCK Oldmanonly.jpg 20:36, 10 February 2009 (UTC)

Template:Mindanao

Keep
Delete
Comments
  • Abstain. It's only on one article: Democratic People's Republic of Mindanao. And that article sucks enough that this shitty template doesn't really drag the article down. So we can either leave things as they are, or we can transclude it onto the page and delete it. And quite honestly, I don't give a shit. Tinymasaru.gifpillow talk 04:10, 8 February 2009 (UTC)
  • Compromise suggestion How about, somebody nominates that article for VFD, we delete it, then we QVFD this template for being unused? But, I don't see how the non-use of the template is a reason for keeping it. We should delete it so that it doesn't get spammed by some noob. --Mnb'z 04:26, 8 February 2009 (UTC)

Tom Delonge

Keep
  • Keep I think it can be fixed. Keeping is better than deleting, and getting something worse. MrN MrN9000SouthParksmall.jpg 14:45, Feb 8
  • Keep per above. --Mnb'z 00:16, 9 February 2009 (UTC)
Delete
  • DEL-FUCKING-ETE This is a load of crap. Plus the thing about the pubes and the used scalpel made me cringe. 03:55, 7 February 2009 (UTC)
  • Delete' per above. --Mnb'z 05:31, 7 February 2009 (UTC)
  • Delete. Not funny. -Sockpuppet of an unregistered user 13:33, 7 February 2009 (UTC)
  • delete. uegh, can't get much worse than this. SirGerrycheeversGunTalk 21:06, 9 February 2009 (UTC)
  • Delete. Bandcruft. Identikit bandcruft. Don't see much to improve - a blank canvas would do just as well. --UU - natter UU Manhole.gif 09:33, Feb 10
  • Delete. There see? I admit it. I was wrong. I didn't notice that it was pants... MrN MrN9000SouthParksmall.jpg 20:36, Feb 10
Comments

Template:Iraq

Keep
Delete
  • Symbol delete vote.svg Delete. semi-unused bullshit national sectional template, rip off on {{Commonwealth}}. This isn't that bad in itself. However, most nations would have a real national sectional template, this one, and others like it, gives the same information but more confusingly, disorderly, and with some tired attempts at humor.--Mnb'z 16:29, 6 February 2009 (UTC)
  • Symbol delete vote.svg Delete. Yea! MrN MrN9000SouthParksmall.jpg 23:13, Feb 6
  • Not really worth keeping. Delete. Tinymasaru.gifpillow talk 00:05, 7 February 2009 (UTC)
  • Symbol delete vote.svg Delete.Dame PPsigPPlips.gifGUN PotY WotM 2xPotM 17xVFH VFP Poo PMS •YAP• 22:45, 8 February 2009 (UTC)
  • shock & awe. SirGerrycheeversGunTalk 21:05, 9 February 2009 (UTC)
  • Kay --Littleboyonly.jpg TKFUJewriken.GIFUJewriken.GIFUJewriken.GIFUJewriken.GIFUJewriken.GIFUJewriken.GIFUJewriken.GIFUJewriken.GIFUJewriken.GIFUJewriken.GIFUJewriken.GIFUJewriken.GIFUJewriken.GIFUJewriken.GIFUJewriken.GIFUJewriken.GIFUJewriken.GIFUJewriken.GIFUJewriken.GIFUJewriken.GIFUUJewriken.GIFUJewriken.GIFUJewriken.GIFUJewriken.GIFUJewriken.GIFUJewriken.GIFUJewriken.GIFUJewriken.GIFUJewriken.GIFUJewriken.GIFUJewriken.GIFUJewriken.GIFUJewriken.GIFUJewriken.GIFUJewriken.GIFUJewriken.GIFUJewriken.GIFUJewriken.GIFUJewriken.GIFUJewriken.GIFUJewriken.GIFCK Oldmanonly.jpg 22:00, 9 February 2009 (UTC)
  • Delete. Pointless. Get rid. --UU - natter UU Manhole.gif 09:28, Feb 10
Comments
  • There is also a template {{Germany}} and a {{Usacountry}} that have the same info as the {{Commonwealth}} template. --Mnb'z 15:26, 7 February 2009 (UTC)
    • Each of those Templates are funny to a degree, we can always merge them and use the Random Title for the header since there redundant to each other already. All this is making the {{Commonwealth}} version look like crap. --Pleb- Sawblade5 [block me!] ( yell | FAQ | I did this ) 18:57, 7 February 2009 (UTC)

Furbish

Keep
  • If the Undictionary entry mentions George W. Bush or anal sex, I will fuck you up. Tinymasaru.gifpillow talk 00:04, 7 February 2009 (UTC)
  • Be careful what you wish for, Sockpuppet. I'm bubbling over with PWN these days. Tinymasaru.gifpillow talk 19:02, 9 February 2009 (UTC)
Delete Stupid, unfunny leftovers from ages past. That's Mama Luigi to you, Mario! 15:38, 5 February 2009 (UTC)
Comments
  • I think this was on the mainpage as a "word of the day" at one point. At least that is what the template says. --S'r Mnbvcxz 18:17, 5 February 2009 (UTC)
  • That doesn't mean it's funny or useful. It hasn't been touched in three years, and I'm sure our standards were different then (if we ever had any). That's Mama Luigi to you, Mario! 19:36, 5 February 2009 (UTC)

Quangle

Keep
Delete
Comments
  • Abstain. It's too short, it doesn't look like an article, and it's highly derivative of South Park's "Marklar." But, damn it, it's pretty funny, too. Tinymasaru.gifpillow talk 22:26, 4 February 2009 (UTC)
  • Abstain. I didn't miss what Hyperbole was talking about. -Sockpuppet of an unregistered user 00:09, 5 February 2009 (UTC)
    • You guys get of the dam fence! You will get splinters in your arse. If you think it's funny vote keep! MrN MrN9000SouthParksmall.jpg 00:13, Feb 5
  • Abstain per above, love of fence sitting. --S'r Mnbvcxz 02:09, 5 February 2009 (UTC)

VFD-padlock.png Venezuelen trench-dwelling moose

Keep
Delete

Symbol delete vote.svg Delete. 15 edits in two years still haven't produced anything of merit. Dame PPsigPPlips.gifGUN PotY WotM 2xPotM 17xVFH VFP Poo PMS •YAP• 22:51, 8 February 2009 (UTC)

Comments
  • Abstain this appears to be random nonsense to me, why keep it. --Mnb'z 00:39, 9 February 2009 (UTC)
  • Abstain. Not good, but inoffensive. Tinymasaru.gifpillow talk 00:54, 9 February 2009 (UTC)
I'm going to sharpen the posts on that fence so you get splinters in your arse. MrN MrN9000SouthParksmall.jpg 00:55, Feb 9
Fortunately for me, my heavy denim pants cover my ass very nicely. limey bastard. Tinymasaru.gifpillow talk 05:09, 9 February 2009 (UTC)
  • Comment - The images are nice, but they don't support the text. Here's the problem, we have an article that is languishing and needs someone to adopt it and love it. Adding images that don't mate with the text confuses it. I'm all for Moose - but if someone isn't going to do soemthing with this article about underwater moose, the it becomes a dust catcher. Dame PPsigPPlips.gifGUN PotY WotM 2xPotM 17xVFH VFP Poo PMS •YAP• 13:32, 9 February 2009 (UTC)
  • I agree. The ideal solution would be for someone to find better ones, but that's time-consuming. I suppose you could always simply remove the offending mismatched ones, if you think that would (slightly) improve things. Tinymasaru.gifpillow talk 19:01, 9 February 2009 (UTC)
  • I voted keep because I laughed reading it. Seriously, I really did. I love the way the author uses beautiful prose to ramble on giving us all the various details and specifications of this sub aquatic moose... It looks like something which someone might have attempted to get passed at Wikipedia but did not manage it. Agreed, we are not their trash bin but I make exceptions if I like the article enough, and this one I like. It's a bit like Japanese Stomping Fish which I'm also a fan of. Each to their own I guess... MrN MrN9000SouthParksmall.jpg 19:21, Feb 9
  • keept -RAHB 05:31, 10 February 2009 (UTC)

VFD-padlock.png Marshmellows

Keep
Delete
  • Symbol delete vote.svg Delete. Its reason for life to tells us how Marshmellows are not Marshmallows; is this necessary? Note, article last edited in May of 2008. Dame PPsigPPlips.gifGUN PotY WotM 2xPotM 17xVFH VFP Poo PMS •YAP• 15:33, 8 February 2009 (UTC)
  • Symbol delete vote.svg Delete. per above. --Mnb'z 22:25, 8 February 2009 (UTC)
  • Symbol delete vote.svg Delete. OOOOH, I love sig number 4. It's like Mnb-Shizzle--DRStrangesig5.png Sherman.png Fingertalk.png  21:05, 9 February 2009 (UTC)
  • Symbol delete vote.svg Delete. Kinda pointless ~SirTagstitVFHNotMPEEINGCPTRotMBFF 22:37, 9 February 2009 (UTC)
  • Symbol delete vote.svg Delete. and just redirect to Marshmallows, already. I mean, really, all this page says is "HA, HA, YOU CAN'T SPELL. FUCK YOU." And if it's going to say that, it should say it more directly. Tinymasaru.gifpillow talk 23:01, 9 February 2009 (UTC)
Comments

Template:KaoruApproved

Keep
Delete
  • Delete completely unused but somehow survived QVFD. Its about a Japanese version of Buttercup from the powerpuff girls. Could we get any more obscure? --Mnb'z 19:14, 9 February 2009 (UTC)
Comments
  • Speedy delete, orphaned template. --Littleboyonly.jpg TKFUJewriken.GIFUJewriken.GIFUJewriken.GIFUJewriken.GIFUJewriken.GIFUJewriken.GIFUJewriken.GIFUJewriken.GIFUJewriken.GIFUJewriken.GIFUJewriken.GIFUJewriken.GIFUJewriken.GIFUJewriken.GIFUJewriken.GIFUJewriken.GIFUJewriken.GIFUJewriken.GIFUJewriken.GIFUJewriken.GIFUUJewriken.GIFUJewriken.GIFUJewriken.GIFUJewriken.GIFUJewriken.GIFUJewriken.GIFUJewriken.GIFUJewriken.GIFUJewriken.GIFUJewriken.GIFUJewriken.GIFUJewriken.GIFUJewriken.GIFUJewriken.GIFUJewriken.GIFUJewriken.GIFUJewriken.GIFUJewriken.GIFUJewriken.GIFUJewriken.GIFUJewriken.GIFCK Oldmanonly.jpg 20:44, 9 February 2009 (UTC)

Hayat

Keep
Delete
  • Delete as nominator - apparent (old) copypaste of Brad. --Pentium5dot1 (semi-retired) t~^_^~c 03:26, 9 February 2009 (UTC)
  • Delete. I don't know its relation to Brad, but the word "Hayat" doesn't appear to refer to anything in particular (it's a disambiguation page on Wikipedia) and this is fantastically random and pointless. Tinymasaru.gifpillow talk 05:14, 9 February 2009 (UTC)
  • Delete that's the most incoherent page I've seen in a while. --Mnb'z 05:54, 9 February 2009 (UTC)
  • Delete it really should be in a Hall of Fame of sorts for articles that raise inane ideas to new heighths. Dame PPsigPPlips.gifGUN PotY WotM 2xPotM 17xVFH VFP Poo PMS •YAP• 14:25, 9 February 2009 (UTC)
  • Delete Go on then... MrN MrN9000SouthParksmall.jpg 18:50, Feb 9
  • Delete. -Sockpuppet of an unregistered user 18:52, 9 February 2009 (UTC)
Comments
  • Checking the discussion pages, it appears the original author wanted to move Brad to Hayat, but a copy-paste happened instead. --Mnb'z 19:28, 9 February 2009 (UTC)

Template:Booty

Keep
Delete
Comments

Template:Jibbajabba

Keep
  • Keep I like this one. Also, it's Mr T for Christ's sake! Do you have no shame sir? Not really insulting maybe the wording could be improved a bit. MrN MrN9000SouthParksmall.jpg 01:08, Feb 9
Its a rouge "fix this" template though. I think that if we do keep it, it should be turned into a proper "rewrite" tag. Its more harshly worded than most rewrite tags. --Mnb'z 01:17, 9 February 2009 (UTC)
Delete
  • Symbol delete vote.svg Delete. Another insulting wannabe rewrite template. If we want a Mr. T. themed rewrite template, this isn't it, its too insulting, and jibbers-jabbers too much.--Mnb'z 00:56, 9 February 2009 (UTC)
  • Restore old Mr. T official rewrite template, delete this redundant template. --Littleboyonly.jpg TKFUJewriken.GIFUJewriken.GIFUJewriken.GIFUJewriken.GIFUJewriken.GIFUJewriken.GIFUJewriken.GIFUJewriken.GIFUJewriken.GIFUJewriken.GIFUJewriken.GIFUJewriken.GIFUJewriken.GIFUJewriken.GIFUJewriken.GIFUJewriken.GIFUJewriken.GIFUJewriken.GIFUJewriken.GIFUJewriken.GIFUUJewriken.GIFUJewriken.GIFUJewriken.GIFUJewriken.GIFUJewriken.GIFUJewriken.GIFUJewriken.GIFUJewriken.GIFUJewriken.GIFUJewriken.GIFUJewriken.GIFUJewriken.GIFUJewriken.GIFUJewriken.GIFUJewriken.GIFUJewriken.GIFUJewriken.GIFUJewriken.GIFUJewriken.GIFUJewriken.GIFUJewriken.GIFCK Oldmanonly.jpg 05:28, 9 February 2009 (UTC)
  • Restore+delete Yea, I looked for this in the rewrite template, but could not find it. MrN MrN9000SouthParksmall.jpg 09:56, Feb 9
  • Delete and restore per MrN9000. -Sockpuppet of an unregistered user 18:56, 9 February 2009 (UTC)
Comments
MrT.gif Stop hand.png "I PITY THE FOO' THAT DOESN'T FIX THIS CRAP!" Stop hand.png
Someone help this sucka of a page by rewriting it.
And make it drink its milk too. Only then can it join The A-Team.

Old Mr. T. rewrite template. For some reason, it along with the Simon version, is currently blanked. (blanking was done by an admin) It might need some work, but we don't need this and the jibbajabba template. --Mnb'z 05:06, 9 February 2009 (UTC)

VFD-padlock.png Template:Little Article

Keep
  • Strong Keep 70 articles? That would be because I regularly use this template. Rewrite suggests that there is something fundamentally wrong with the article which needs changing via a "rewrite". This template is nice way of saying that an article is OK, but it's just needs to be a bit longer. It simply encourages people reading the article to edit it. DO YOU THINK WE SHOULD DELETE {{stub}} ALSO? In addition, {{expand}} has a totally different purpose. {{expand}} has a 30 day stay of execution, and should only be used for new articles. This template does exactly the same thing as {{stub}} and I personally think that in many cases it's a much more effective way of passing on the same message. It does not add to a category as doing so would not be piratical. If I wanted the article to be added to a category I would use {{idea}}. 90% of our articles need some attention, should we put them all in a category? MrN MrN9000SouthParksmall.jpg 13:01, Feb 8
  • Symbol keep vote.svg KEEP! -Sockpuppet of an unregistered user 13:17, 8 February 2009 (UTC)
  • Symbol keep vote.svg very keep--Sycamore (Talk) 14:47, 8 February 2009 (UTC)
  • Symbol keep vote.svg Keep Per the Poopsmith's comments. --Pleb- Sawblade5 [block me!] ( yell | FAQ | I did this ) 18:33, 8 February 2009 (UTC)
Delete

Symbol delete vote.svg Delete.. This template serves no purpose that Rewrite/soft cannot fulfil, and does not automatically add an article to a category for articles to be attended to. It is a confusing and pointless alternative to the rewrite tag that actually serves to prevent needy pages from getting help. There are seventy pages with this tag that might need our help, but no convenient way of accessing the list. I say let the rewrite template do the work. IronLung 08:23, 8 February 2009 (UTC)

Comments
  • I want to further add that many of these articles, where short, could be reclassified as stubs. IronLung 08:36, 8 February 2009 (UTC)
    • Also, {{expand}}. IronLung 09:03, 8 February 2009 (UTC)
  • Speedy Kept --Littleboyonly.jpg TKFUJewriken.GIFUJewriken.GIFUJewriken.GIFUJewriken.GIFUJewriken.GIFUJewriken.GIFUJewriken.GIFUJewriken.GIFUJewriken.GIFUJewriken.GIFUJewriken.GIFUJewriken.GIFUJewriken.GIFUJewriken.GIFUJewriken.GIFUJewriken.GIFUJewriken.GIFUJewriken.GIFUJewriken.GIFUJewriken.GIFUUJewriken.GIFUJewriken.GIFUJewriken.GIFUJewriken.GIFUJewriken.GIFUJewriken.GIFUJewriken.GIFUJewriken.GIFUJewriken.GIFUJewriken.GIFUJewriken.GIFUJewriken.GIFUJewriken.GIFUJewriken.GIFUJewriken.GIFUJewriken.GIFUJewriken.GIFUJewriken.GIFUJewriken.GIFUJewriken.GIFUJewriken.GIFCK Oldmanonly.jpg 18:49, 8 February 2009 (UTC)
  • This is exactly what {tl|expand}} should be, btw. Spang talk 21:24, 08 Feb 2009
  • I do think this might need some auto-categorization though. I generally believe if an article is bad enough to have a "fix this" template on it, it should also go in some category so people can find it to fix. --Mnb'z 22:16, 8 February 2009 (UTC)
    • How about "Category:Little Articles"? -Sockpuppet of an unregistered user 22:19, 8 February 2009 (UTC)
      • Or... Category:Stuck_articles_needing_a_push, which is linked from here. Like I said, we have to draw the line somewhere. There is no point listing everything in a category. People don't even bother with Uncyclopedia:Ideas right now... MrN MrN9000SouthParksmall.jpg 22:22, Feb 8
        • Why not categorize it though? If those articles were in in one more category, would it hurt anything? --Mnb'z 22:30, 8 February 2009 (UTC)
          • There is only so much editing effort to go around. Some articles need the extra attention more than others. We advertise some key categories in prominent places, and that's why they get the attention they do. When a user goes to say Category:rewrite they see a huge list of articles needing work. If we included say all the {{stub}} class of templates in a category (there are lots of different stub templates) then we would have a list with thousands of articles in it. A list with so many articles in it is less useful, as the attention is spread over a wider area. The point is to have a layered system which focus the editing effort we have where it is most needed. We use {{idea}} for the really good stubs, as we think that they have a good chance of becoming featured articles one day. This template works fine as a simple "edit me!" template for people who happen to find the page. We have to draw a line somewhere... I thought about this one myself a while back, and agreed with you for a while, but now I think things are best as they are. Also, we have Special:ShortPages. ;) MrN MrN9000SouthParksmall.jpg 23:05, Feb 8

Template:Pokemonwarning

Keep
  • I changed the text of the template to your vote. Revert if you want, but I think it makes it so much better. Tinymasaru.gifpillow talk 17:49, 31 January 2009 (UTC)
  • I think your version is better, I updated the formatting some to get rid of the dead space. --Mnbvcxz 17:52, 31 January 2009 (UTC)
  • No, my grammar obtains to the good and strong, and your indictment of my usages of the grammar is insult and bad. Please enjoy at once, by all means. Tinymasaru.gifpillow talk 18:25, 3 February 2009 (UTC)
  • Seriously though, we are not voting if this is funny in and off itself. (And an admin reverted it back to its original form) We are voting on whether is should be on several articles. I would agree its funny once, but its not funny 50 times. No "comment" template is. --Mnb'z 05:53, 7 February 2009 (UTC)

Keep. As a result of the VFD process, this one is undergoing a whole slew of edits, and I just don't feel like deleting it at this time is appropriate. It's like, if you're going to put your kid's puppy to sleep, you don't rip it out of his hands. You wait until the kid falls asleep and then tell him his dog ran away. Tinymasaru.gifpillow talk 16:06, 4 February 2009 (UTC)

Delete
  • Delete meaningless warning template. (Unless somebody here is deeply disturbed by seeing Pokemon.) If deleting this is too hard on userspace, how about we exile it from mainspace? --Mnbvcxz 16:51, 31 January 2009 (UTC)
  • Delete This is funny? MrN MrN9000SouthParksmall.jpg 01:10, Feb 1
  • Pokémon. Necropaxx (T) {~} 18:28, Feb 2
  • Delete on the grounds that it encourages people to create more pokemon articles. Seriously, guys, just stop it. - T.L.B. Baloon.gif WotM, UotM, FPrize, AotM, ANotM, PLS, UN:HS, GUN 18:28, Feb 3
  • delete as per TLB, whoever that is. SirGerrycheeversGunTalk 19:52, 5 February 2009 (UTC)
  • Symbol delete vote.svg Ultra-delete. Like, with knives and stuff. IronLung 19:08, 6 February 2009 (UTC)
  • Delete. Okay, Spang apparently doesn't want this edited, and I sure as fuck don't want to edit-war with Spang. So I'm changing my vote to "kill with fire." Tinymasaru.gifpillow talk 23:15, 6 February 2009 (UTC)
  • What. --Aljolson.jpg Hi, hey! I'M A MOTERFUCKING NIGGER BITCH LOVER Aljolson.jpg 05:59, 7 February 2009 (UTC)
  • Neh --Littleboyonly.jpg TKFUJewriken.GIFUJewriken.GIFUJewriken.GIFUJewriken.GIFUJewriken.GIFUJewriken.GIFUJewriken.GIFUJewriken.GIFUJewriken.GIFUJewriken.GIFUJewriken.GIFUJewriken.GIFUJewriken.GIFUJewriken.GIFUJewriken.GIFUJewriken.GIFUJewriken.GIFUJewriken.GIFUJewriken.GIFUJewriken.GIFUUJewriken.GIFUJewriken.GIFUJewriken.GIFUJewriken.GIFUJewriken.GIFUJewriken.GIFUJewriken.GIFUJewriken.GIFUJewriken.GIFUJewriken.GIFUJewriken.GIFUJewriken.GIFUJewriken.GIFUJewriken.GIFUJewriken.GIFUJewriken.GIFUJewriken.GIFUJewriken.GIFUJewriken.GIFUJewriken.GIFUJewriken.GIFCK Oldmanonly.jpg 20:02, 8 February 2009 (UTC)
Comments
  • I really don't think these "this article contains X" quasi-warning templates need to exist. They are just clutter. The purpose of a warning template is to warn the reader that there is a good chance they won't want to read the article. Really, what purpose does this serve? --Mnbvcxz 17:43, 31 January 2009 (UTC)
    • Ok, its funny in a silly way. However, will it still be funny when you see the same new version of the template on the 50th pokemon article? I'd fully support code sub that on a few articles, but I don't think we need the dancing milk on each and every page about pokemon. Futhermore, keeping this will make it harder to delete the next time somebody tries, we don't want it to become immortal like the crap template. --S'r Mnbvcxz 02:16, 5 February 2009 (UTC)
      • As of right now the Delete have Majority Vote, but I have a feeling that it will be restored as an In Joke as it appears that Spang is watching over it. Besides the fact that this is a well used template. --Pleb- Sawblade5 [block me!] ( yell | FAQ | I did this ) 05:59, 8 February 2009 (UTC)

Fraternity

Keep
Delete
  • Delete. Contains equal parts random and suck. Sir Modusoperandi Boinc! 23:43, 7 February 2009 (UTC)
  • Delete --Mnb'z 23:55, 7 February 2009 (UTC)
  • Delete Anything which Modus noms for VFD I refuse to read on principle. MrN MrN9000SouthParksmall.jpg 04:06, Feb 8
  • Delete. It is a pile of shit. If only I could so easily delete the literal piles of shit around here. Tinymasaru.gifpillow talk 04:08, 8 February 2009 (UTC)
  • Fucking Retarded Ass Touchers. --Aljolson.jpg Hi, hey! I'M A MOTERFUCKING NIGGER BITCH LOVER Aljolson.jpg 04:14, 8 February 2009 (UTC)
Comments

Template:Fail

Keep
Delete
Comments

Iraqistan

Keep
Delete
Comments