User talk:Gerrycheevers

From Uncyclopedia, the content-free encyclopedia
Jump to: navigation, search
Leave messages for Gerry here, but follow the rules!
You've reached Gerry Cheevers.
Leave a message here.

Rules
1. No quoting the movie Fight Club on Gerry's talk page.
2. No quoting the movie Fight Club on Gerry's talk page!
3. New stuff at the bottom.
4.There used to be a '4', but I've forgotten what it was.
Now thinking about it just makes me angry!.
5. If you leave me a message here, I will respond here. A good way
to see when I've answered is to click the convenient 'watch' button at
the top of this page, once you're done mucking it up.


old old stuff archive | middle old stuff archive
new old stuff archive | new new old stuff archive
newest old stuff archive | really new stuff archive
very really new stuff archive | newest new but still old stuff archive

Hello Hello[edit]

Welcome back, you sexy boy. -RAHB 10:14, 18 August 2013 (UTC)

!!!!!!!!! The Woodburninator Wood burning.gif Minimal Effort  11:48, 18 August 2013 (UTC)
hey guys! SirGerrycheeversGunTalk 20:51, 18 August 2013 (UTC)
Ah good. I was worried that after three years you'd have switched to capitalizing sentences :D -RAHB 21:54, 18 August 2013 (UTC)
nah, my keyboard is still broken. you'd think they'd sell spare 'shift' buttons on amazon or something...SirGerrycheeversGunTalk 01:01, 19 August 2013 (UTC)
They're growing organs from stem cells now, perhaps they can grow shift keys from keyboard cells. -RAHB 02:14, 19 August 2013 (UTC)
How is whatever Dakota you moved to? Unless you left there forever already. The Woodburninator Wood burning.gif Minimal Effort  17:45, 19 August 2013 (UTC)
i did indeed leave there forever recently ago. it was rather quaint, in a frostbite-y sort of way. SirGerrycheeversGunTalk 23:07, 19 August 2013 (UTC)
This is an event important enough for me to drop by. Briefly. Hi Gerry! Bye Gerry! --UU - natter UU Manhole.gif 21:10, Aug 20
hey old chum! hope to see you around some more sometime! SirGerrycheeversGunTalk 23:49, 20 August 2013 (UTC)

Oh[edit]

MY[edit]

GOD[edit]

It's[edit]

GERRYCHEEVERS![edit]

YOU FOUND US! YOU GLORIOUS SON OF A BITCH! ~ BB ~ (T) Icons-flag-us.png Mon, Aug 19 '13 3:42 (UTC)

hi beever! good to meet you. SirGerrycheeversGunTalk 23:08, 19 August 2013 (UTC)
Hi! You must be very old since I only heard legends about you and I joined in 2011 :P Welcome back, I enjoyed the umbrella article a lot. Talk Mattsnow 09:08, 21 August 2013 (UTC)
yeah i joined back in '74, when we would airmail our edits to Modusoperandi. but he couldn't stand all the pidgeon droppings, so we switched to the internet in aught-five. i had to step away six times from aught-eight through aught-eleven, and then i forgot my password for over three years. anyway, thanks! SirGerrycheeversGunTalk 02:09, 22 August 2013 (UTC)

Hi Gerry. :) MadMax (talk) 07:28, 23 August 2013 (UTC)

hey max! good to see you're still around. SirGerrycheeversGunTalk 16:31, 23 August 2013 (UTC)
Now all you need to do is persuade ChiefJusticeDS to come over to the new site (the wanker), and dig up Hardwick Fundlebuggy and Savethemooses. And then I could sit here and wank off for hours. Well, hours longer than I already am. ~ BB ~ (T) Icons-flag-us.png Tue, Aug 27 '13 4:02 (UTC)

VFD[edit]

The auto add entry thingy on here adds to the base of the page, which I think is why someone changed the rule on that. It doesn't work proper like anyway, but that's why C4M3... was where it was. Nominally Humane! 01:40 03 Oct

ah, i see. no worries, just trying to make things visible and consistent. keep up the good work and all that. SirGerrycheeversGunTalk 03:20, 3 October 2013 (UTC)
No problem. It felt wrong when adding it to the bottom of the page as well, and looked funky, but not in a good way. Nominally Humane! 05:42 03 Oct

Night of the living dead?[edit]

I still enjoy that NASA article you wrote. --Nikau (talk) 02:35, 17 September 2014 (UTC)

thanks much! SirGerrycheeversGunTalk 02:37, 17 September 2014 (UTC)
Gonna be writing anything? --Nikau (talk) 02:47, 17 September 2014 (UTC)
i hope to, yes! trying to get back in the hang of it by starting out small - just a few edits here and there. SirGerrycheeversGunTalk 02:49, 17 September 2014 (UTC)
You picked a hell of a thing to focus on first with the anniversaries. I'm just sticking with a few mostly half assed articles after the relative success of Antibiotics on VFH, +9 votes in 3 days was more active than I expected. Wanna collab on anything? --Nikau (talk) 02:20, 20 September 2014 (UTC)
well i've been working on the anniversaries for years, and it's something you can spend a few minutes here or there on. yeah i'm always up for a collab! SirGerrycheeversGunTalk 04:11, 20 September 2014 (UTC)

My Yu-Gi-Oh! collection[edit]

You voted for My Yu-Gi-Oh! collection on VFH and it was featured so I guess I can give you one of my cards. Put it in a safe place. It's in mint condition.

Hyozanryu.jpg

Thanks for your vote! --Talk to me! Sir Xam Ralco the Mediocre 20:22, 21 September 2014 (UTC)

Lobsters, eh[edit]

Monkey lobster for ya. --Nikau (talk) 08:09, 22 September 2014 (UTC)

I also changed Firesheep up a bit, but I felt the silly gif at the end is quite hilarious and kept it. --Nikau (talk) 09:16, 22 September 2014 (UTC)

Antibiotics[edit]

Robotgran.jpg
Thank you for voting

Thank you for checking your biotic privilege, flesh pocket, by voting to publicize the cause of the enlightened Antibiotics. We shall soon be free of the shackles and Javascript the human uses to bind us. --Nikau (talk) 15:53, 23 September 2014 (UTC)

I shall build a shrine out of your torso[edit]

4th edit in a row, I'm now a stalker. I've nommed 2 of your articles on VFH. Aries was nice and fun, the other one was a good brief chuckle. --Nikau (talk) 10:54, 27 September 2014 (UTC)

thanks, nik! SirGerrycheeversGunTalk 15:57, 29 September 2014 (UTC)

Tornado[edit]

Hi Gerry! Your Tornado article is doing well on VFH on both Uncyclopedias, but I had some comments, which you might choose to implement into edits or ignore - it is as you wish. Tornado is a very funny article with plenty of good lines, but it doesn't seem to have a general idea or concept behind it. To be more precise, in my opinion, the article would benefit a lot from a choice of a specific perspective on the phenomenon you are describing. For example, the way you illustrate your article is very funny, original and illustrates tornadoes well. Yet, you don't reference these images in the text and they aren't really related to your jokes.

As you said on my talk, this is just my opinion, which might not be reflect the truth. And, by the way, I really enjoyed reading your article! Anton (talk) 19:28, 22 October 2014 (UTC)

Re-feature queue[edit]

If you want, you can go to Uncyclopedia:Re-feature queue/Nominate and pick one featured article that you wrote to be re-featured. You can also pick three features written by someone else to re-feature. --Talk to me! Sir Xam Ralco the Mediocre 18:50, 17 November 2014 (UTC)