Forum:Benson: A referendum

Forums: Index > Village Dump > Benson: A referendum (talk)

Note: This topic has been unedited for 6329 days. It is considered archived - the discussion is over. Do not add to unless it really needs a response.

Okay, I think we finally need to tackle the whole Benson issue head on. Without further comment on his actions, or those of his followers, we need to vote on the problem.

And um, one vote only please!

For your information, the section on "Vote to ban Benson, remove BHOP, etc. (Complete and utter destruction)" has been archivedto the bottom of this page, because there was a resounding keep consensus. Please feel free to add your vote to the other sections, and discuss alternatives.

UnBan, Probation, Move BHOP & All of His Content To His User Space (Tighten the Reins)

Score: +3

• For, 23:02, 18 January 2007 (UTC)
• For. Unban, but place special rules on him and his followers. --» >UF|TLK|▋» 23:01, 18 January 2007 (UTC)
• For. -- Mitch 07:37, 19 January 2007 (UTC)

Leave things as they are

Score: +10

• See above. --Anyone 23:09, 18 January 2007 (UTC)
• BHOP is just fine with me. I check it for laffs when there's nothing interesting on the real forum. Why mess with it? Shit, as long as the "BENSON is the Titty-Nipple of Brahma" nonsense stays off the real forum I don't care if it infests BHOP. But to be quite frank I am drunk as hell right now and am not inclined to make sense.----OEJ 03:38, 19 January 2007 (UTC)
• Jefferson once said, "But it does me no injury for my neighbor to say there are twenty Bensons or no Benson. It neither picks my pocket nor breaks my leg.". I read it on teh internets.--Sir Modusoperandi ^Boinc! 03:43, 19 January 2007 (UTC)
• As irritating as I sometimes find Benson, et al., For per Modus et al.  Sir Tooltroll, Esq. CUN • Eh? • Oh! • UnTunes! •• I my cat! 07:18, 19 January 2007 (UTC)
• For, per Modus. If it ain't broke...--<<>> 14:11, 19 January 2007 (UTC)
• Who the fuck is Benson?---Rev. Isra (talk) 15:23, 19 January 2007 (UTC)
• I won't cut 'n paste what I wrote before, but will proceed with it accordingly. Keep it reasonably contained and follow the 2 "rules" and no hall passes will be issued. --Sir Todd GUN WotM MI UotM NotM MDA VFH AotM Bur. AlBur. CM NS PC (talk) 20:41, 19 January 2007 (UTC)
• Yup -- 20:50, 19 January 2007 (UTC)
• This is my vote. There are many like it, but this one is mine. --The Zombiebaron 21:06, 19 January 2007 (UTC)
• For --Composure1 04:49, 20 January 2007 (UTC)

Vote on what we want to get for dinner tonight

• I say we get Chinese. —Hinoa talk.kun 23:51, 18 January 2007 (UTC)
• No! Italian! Italian! --Crazyswordsman...With SAVINGS!!!! (T/C) 23:52, 18 January 2007 (UTC)
• Liver with some fava beans and a nice chianti, 00:01, 19 January 2007 (UTC)
• I want lasagna! --General Insineratehymn 00:04, 19 January 2007 (UTC)
• Chicken curry, chana masala, and naan. --Sir Todd GUN WotM MI UotM NotM MDA VFH AotM Bur. AlBur. CM NS PC (talk) 00:10, 19 January 2007 (UTC)
• Pizza! --» >UF|TLK|▋» 00:11, 19 January 2007 (UTC)
• Beef.   t o m p k i n s  blah. ﺞوﻦ וףה ՃՄ ண்ஸ ފއހ วอฏม +տ trade websites 00:26, 19 January 2007 (UTC)
• Mexican or I'm leaving the wiki foreverandeverandeverandever you bastards -- Sir Codeine K·H·P·B·M·N·C·U·Bu. · (Harangue) 01:33, 19 January 2007 (UTC)
  • Will you be satisfied with Taco Bell? --General Insineratehymn 01:50, 19 January 2007 (UTC)
• Ice Cream -- §. | WotM | PLS | T | C | A 01:58, 19 January 2007 (UTC)
• Pancakes From Benson's 3D House of Pancakes --Composure1 01:59, 19 January 2007 (UTC)
• Not that Goddamned Vegan place again. I've had quite enough of bony miserable people with transparent skin, thank you very much. And why the hell do all of them smoke?--Sir Modusoperandi ^Boinc! 03:31, 19 January 2007 (UTC)
• BRAINS. Don't act like you didn't expect that. --The Zombiebaron 03:43, 19 January 2007 (UTC)
• I have been listening obsessively to Tom Waits' Mule Variations CD and I vote we cook up a Filipino Boxspring Hog. My second choice is rattlesnake frittata with mincemeat filigree. Just think what kind of Uncyc articles Tom Waits would write. It shrivels the mind.----OEJ 03:44, 19 January 2007 (UTC)
• Ham Hickory smoked.--Witt, of UNion Entertain me* 05:07, 19 January 2007 (UTC)
• I think we should compromise between Zombie and OEJ, and have Tom Waits' Brains! . . . or sushi.  Sir Tooltroll, Esq. CUN • Eh? • Oh! • UnTunes! •• I my cat! 07:16, 19 January 2007 (UTC)
• Surf and Turf special, with fresh lobster and fillet mignon with Béarnaise sauce, a helping of steamed clams, and SPAM without the SPAM, if you insist. --»The Acceptable Cainad (Fnord) 19:14, 19 January 2007 (UTC)
• Well... actually no, let's just go to the chippy again. -- Hindleyite Converse • ?pedia 19:15, 19 January 2007 (UTC)
• For for the fish and chip shop! -Kjhf!- (feeling chatty?) 20:10, 19 January 2007 (UTC)
• Eisbein, sauerkraut, potato salad, some wursts and lots of beer! Prost! -- herr doktor needsAshuttle  [scream!] 20:16, 19 January 2007 (UTC)
• How about all of them?? -Kjhf!- (feeling chatty?) 20:26, 19 January 2007 (UTC)
• Kjhf, the doorbell's ringing. You paying? -- 20:51, 19 January 2007 (UTC)
• Meh, If it makes you all happy... *hands over £100 to deliverer + tip.* -Kjhf!- (feeling chatty?) 20:53, 19 January 2007 (UTC)
• EXCUSE ME! Did anyone remember to bring some beer?! Brigadier Sir Mordillo GUN UotY WotM FP UotM AotM MI³ AnotM VFH +S 11:15, 20 January 2007 (UTC)

• This is a Viking Party, bucko. None of that beer nonsense here, we've got mead! --»The Acceptable Cainad (Fnord) 20:03, 20 January 2007 (UTC)

I wondered why the beer was so viscous...don't worry, I keep a pony keg in the trunk, just in case.--Sir Modusoperandi ^Boinc! 20:05, 20 January 2007 (UTC)

Vote on wheather kjhf was/is generous.

Yes -Kjhf!- (feeling chatty?) 20:55, 19 January 2007 (UTC)

• /rest of us come out from hiding in the bathroom. Wha? Someone has already paid. /rest of us pats pockets. All we've got it hundreds, can you break them?--Sir Modusoperandi ^Boinc! 02:21, 20 January 2007 (UTC)
• Let's just say, all expences paid. -Kjhf!- (feeling chatty?) 10:52, 20 January 2007 (UTC)

Let's work on a policy here.

Like I said, there should be a restriction on all Benson related activity to this forum. This means no more Benson stuff in the off topic forum. However, I would like a link from the off topic forum to the new Benson forum so people know where to go. Any posting about Benson or in caps in any other forum warrants a warning the first time (because people might not know about that policy), and a one day ban for every subsequent time. But no one ever gets permabanned for doing this unless they are a constant disruption, which it seems to not be. --Crazyswordsman...With SAVINGS!!!! (T/C) 22:36, 19 January 2007 (UTC) See talk page...

Archive

Vote to ban Benson, remove BHOP, etc. (Complete and utter destruction)

Consensus: Keep --BarryC

Score: -16

• Ban. --The Rt. Hon. BarryC MUN (Symposium!) Sigh. Double Sigh. 23:00, 18 January 2007 (UTC)
• Ban, remove, and prohibit the mention of his name anywhere. Benson is worthless to uncyclopedia, which gains nothing from him, while he and his followers generate notable amounts of trouble while distracting others from making this site better. They are nothing but a drain on uncyclopedia and do not deserve protection. Being a UGotM means you have held as close to the banstick as you could without getting hit with it, and that's what he and his followers, who emulate him, do constantly. It is a clear and present danger to the future of the site. » Brig Sir Dawg | t | v | c » 2007.01.18.23:02
• Keep him unbanned, he doesn't deserve a permaban, and the warning page should created enough of a separation from the real world. And I agree with UNKNOWNFILE about having rules. -- » Sir Savethemooses Grand Commanding Officer ... holla atcha boy» 23:03, 18 January 2007 (UTC)
• Keep -- Sir Mhaille  (talk to me) 23:09, 18 January 2007 (UTC)
• Keep --General Insineratehymn 23:13, 18 January 2007 (UTC)
• Keep. Has done nothing wrong.   t o m p k i n s  blah. ﺞوﻦ וףה ՃՄ ண்ஸ ފއހ วอฏม +տ trade websites 23:13, 18 January 2007 (UTC)
• Keep per STM. --Crazyswordsman...With SAVINGS!!!! (T/C) 23:50, 18 January 2007 (UTC)
• Keep. Just because something is irritating to you, it doesn't mean it should be banned. A judgement was made some time ago about the forumcruft, and it was dealt with by moving it to BHOP. The only offence I've seen Benson himself be guilty of was the sockpuppeting, which he has received his punishment for. Articles about him and his "cult" are vanity though, and should be either huffed or relegated to BHOP, as I want this wiki to be as inclusive as possible for new users, and not just another internet community plagued by in-jokes. Making a big issue out of it is, quite frankly, embarrasing though. -- Sir Codeine K·H·P·B·M·N·C·U·Bu. · (Harangue) 23:55, 18 January 2007 (UTC)
• Keep. The problem is not with Benson, nor BHOP, but his obsessive fanboys. We need comic relief and a forum for pure silliness. If we're going to ban anyone (and I'm not), it should be the users who treat him like the second coming of J.C. and expect the rest of us to climb onboard like it's serious. If this continues, the guilty will be issued a hall pass down to Flammable's Office. --Sir Todd GUN WotM MI UotM NotM MDA VFH AotM Bur. AlBur. CM NS PC (talk) 00:08, 19 January 2007 (UTC)
• Keep Cody and Todd said it all. —rc (t) 01:47, 19 January 2007 (UTC)
• Keep - As per my comments in BHOP --KWild 01:53, 19 January 2007 (UTC)
• Keep and also unban Nin. goshzillacorrespondence 01:56, 19 January 2007 (UTC)
• Keep Uncyclopedia needs a place where one can relax and feel free to post whatever they want and be silly, and BHOP serves that purpose. --Composure1 01:58, 19 January 2007 (UTC)
• Keep per Todd. -- §. | WotM | PLS | T | C | A 01:59, 19 January 2007 (UTC)
• Comment. I should probably let you guys know that we (or at least I) stopped with the "Hallowed Halls" nonsense a long time ago. --Crazyswordsman...With SAVINGS!!!! (T/C) 02:33, 19 January 2007 (UTC)
• Keep. --Uncyclon - Do we still link to BENSON? 03:05, 19 January 2007 (UTC)
• Keep, but satirize him. What is the difference between BENSON and Ronson? A Ronson stops flaming on command, but BENSON just goes on and on. What is the difference between a moth falling into a candle flame and a BENSON follower falling into a BENSON flame? None -- they both get fried. (For that matter, I'm fried right now on a rather pathetic merlot.) How many actual articles has BENSON written? I don't know, but I've written five times as many. [After a quick drunken check: make that 20 times as many. Roughly.] BENSON ain't the Swiss cheese, he's the holes. If Uncyc is a cheeseburger, BENSON is a fleck of pigeon poo six miles away. Come on, we are supposed to be the Kings of Funny. And here we are taking a joke user seriously. Fuck that. ----OEJ 03:34, 19 January 2007 (UTC)
• Keep. All that needs to be said has been said on irc last night, and above. • Spang • ☃ • talk • 03:59, 19 Jan 2007
• Keep, per OEJ. Essentially a more concise version of what I said in the BHOP. --»The Acceptable Cainad (Fnord) 19:22, 19 January 2007 (UTC)
• Keep To kill him would be like drowning all his followers. (Say, that gave me an idea...) -Kjhf!- (feeling chatty?) 20:10, 19 January 2007 (UTC)
• Keep. He doesn't actually do any real harm, in terms of Drama and users leaving, etc. Certain followers can be a bit of a pain but it's always been under the surface till now, and with the main problem gone I think there should only be a problem with the users who have... well, always disliked him. So long as Bensonites keep Benson in his church, and don't deliberately seek trouble, it should be fine - he's useful against twattery and doesn't, in himself, do any harm. -- 20:28, 19 January 2007 (UTC)