Uncyclopedia:VFP

• Nominate an image you find excellent. Use {{vfp|image=Imagename.jpg|size=123px|name=The Nominated Image|caption=Blabla '''[[link]]''' |credit=ImageCreator|score (optional)}}. Make sure you sign your votes with ~~~~ or the "your signature with timestamp" button on the edit screen.
  • You may nominate up to two of your own images per week. No more. You can nominate as many images by other people as you want.
  • Voting: use "For" or "Against" (or some clear iteration) in bold type to specify your vote. Comments are allowed, but excessive discussion/argument is not. Use the image's talk page for that.
  • Please submit only ORIGINAL IMAGES to VFP. Images from elsewhere on the Internet can be used on articles, but will not be featured.
  • Unmanipulated as well as photoshopped images are allowed as long as they are original.
  • When nominating an image, you may place {{VFP}} on the image page.
• Do not remove or archive nominations. Loser admins will see to that.
• You can see all previously featured images here, or on the archived voting pages: 1, 2, 3, 4.
• To vote on previously featured images, use Uncyclopedia:PFP.
• Please read HowTo:Get Your Image Featured before nominating your own image. You are also encouraged to submit your image to Image Review for peer opinions before you list it on VFP.
• Also, please remember we are trying to feature images, not tell everyone how much they suck. Take it elsewhere, and instead of pissing and moaning, nominate a picture you like.

Hitlerbear reminds you to focus on quality.

Current nominations

• New nominations on top, votes start with *, add --~~~~ after your vote, please.

The Aspie War in the News

Score:0 Web Slinging Freelance Photographers Featured picture candidate
Much of the press rallied behind the Uncyclopedian defenders in The Great Aspie War of Ought Six Image credit: Procopius Archive - Discuss this image

• For Good image, great time for it.--The One and Only Czar Yah 17:48, 29 October 2006 (UTC)
• For It will never be funny again, if it's going to get featured, now's the time. --Hrodulf 17:53, 29 October 2006 (UTC)
• For! I was going to nominate this, but I thought that two VFP nominations from myself in a row would be too much. - Sikon 17:55, 29 October 2006 (UTC)
• Weak For Hmmm...we all know that this won't last long, cause in a year people will be like "Why the fuck was this featured?", because this is a current in joke. Oh, and for the record I don't think this will last a year. All that aside, its funny now. --Sir Zombiebaron 17:58, 29 October 2006 (UTC)
• Against Because things seldom drop off through PFP. I wouldn't want another in-joke image like the Euroipods one to remain for over a year after it happened. » Brig Sir Dawg | t | v | c » 17:59, 29 October 2006 (UTC)
• Against Too injokey. We need a "Hall of Stuff, Things and Whatnot" for things like this. --Sir Modusoperandi ^Boinc! 18:10, 29 October 2006 (UTC)
• For 18:33, 29 October 2006 (UTC)
• Against, in-jokes are so 2005. --Uncyclon - Do we still link to BENSON? 22:26, 29 October 2006 (UTC)
• For, though this joke is SO 2006.--<<>> 23:46, 29 October 2006 (UTC)
• Against, funny only to insiders (and not all of them) -- sannse (talk)
• No. -- Sir C  Holla | CUN 00:54, 30 October 2006 (UTC)
• Thanks for the nod, Czar Yah. But I couldn't sleep at night if I supported an image in an article I voted against on VFH. So, sadly, against.--Procopius 00:59, 30 October 2006 (UTC)
• For. Because my new purpose in life is to cancel out Cornbreads vote. --Vosnul 07:05, 30 October 2006 (UTC)

Wikistitution

Score:+4 US Founding Fathers Featured picture candidate
The constitution that anyone can edit, before it was converted into the digital form. Image credit: Zombiebaron Archive - Discuss this image

• N+F. - Sikon 14:34, 29 October 2006 (UTC)
• For. ~ Ghelæ ^talk_contribs 14:37, 29 October 2006 (UTC)
• Whore --Sir Zombiebaron 14:46, 29 October 2006 (UTC)
• For score and twenty years ago? Is that how it goes? -- Brigadier Sir Mordillo GUN UotY WotM FP UotM AotM MI³ AnotM VFH +S 14:54, 29 October 2006 (UTC)
• For, damned activist founding fathers... they obviously weren't thinking about what the founding fathers wanted when they made this.--<<>> 15:23, 29 October 2006 (UTC)
• For 16:02, 29 October 2006 (UTC)
• For, though I'm trying to decide if some of the shopping quirks could use touchup or are charming. It looks really good in thumbnail. :) --monika 17:53, 29 October 2006 (UTC)
• Weak against. Neat idea, but on closer inspection it is poorly done and not worthy of feature. » Brig Sir Dawg | t | v | c » 18:02, 29 October 2006 (UTC)
• Against As Dawg, but with a big bouquet of daisies. Plus, as a wiki parody, in addition to the blackouts, shouldn't there be paragraphs taped/stapled onto the page?--Sir Modusoperandi ^Boinc! 18:07, 29 October 2006 (UTC)

Its not a wiki parady, or at it wasn't made as such. It was made because Wikistitution had no images, and because Wikistitution has a lot striked text. And Wikistitution has no overtly added sections. But, whatever. --Sir Zombiebaron 18:14, 29 October 2006 (UTC)

Comment, it works on the page for which it was made. As a featured pic, however, it would work better with added text. --Sir Modusoperandi ^Boinc! 18:42, 29 October 2006 (UTC)

• Week Against* I love the Isea, but it dosn't look anything like the legit. Declaration....--Private First Class Nappoleon V ^{Talk Decorations}19:28, 29 October 2006 (UTC)
• FOR!I love the Isea, and it dosn't look anything like the legit Declaration....--Unistyle 22:30, 29 October 2006 (UTC)
• Against. -- Sir C  Holla | CUN 00:56, 30 October 2006 (UTC)

Chickenbox

Score:+11 Foul tasting fowl Featured picture candidate
And they said it couldn't be done. Image credit: Tom mayfair Archive - Discuss this image

• N&F - Fingerlickin' good..... -- Sir Mhaille  (talk to me) 20:31, 28 October 2006 (UTC)
• For. I know someone who worked in KFC and they said this sort of thing actually happened... maybe. -- Hindleyite 20:39, 28 October 2006 (UTC)
• Against. Wasnt this nommed before...? -- Sir C  Holla | CUN 23:23, 28 October 2006 (UTC)

Comment It was but it was a different version. Similar but not the same at all. 23:26, 28 October 2006 (UTC)

Corn, Please. How is that a reason for voting against? Maybe if you had said "It was nommed before, and it was crap then and it is crap now" but basing you're vote off something that once happened has nothing to do with the image it self, which ulimately is what we are voting upon. --Sir Zombiebaron 13:54, 29 October 2006 (UTC)

• For. that's frickin' hilarious... also, what has a different version being nommed got to do with your voting against it you miserable hater? :P --Olipro Anchor KUN (Harass) 23:35, 28 October 2006 (UTC)

Comment -I didnt know it was a different version, but I voted against the concept last time. Hey, dont hate the player hate the game... -- Sir C  Holla | CUN 23:38, 28 October 2006 (UTC)

• Against. However, the "Foul tasting fowl" is really great. I often work off those words, since I hate fowl. » Brig Sir Dawg | t | v | c » 23:41, 28 October 2006 (UTC)
• For fried boxes.--<<>> 00:40, 29 October 2006 (UTC)
• for Heh, heh.--The One and Only Czar Yah 05:23, 29 October 2006 (UTC)
• For. ~ Ghelæ ^talk_contribs 07:55, 29 October 2006 (UTC)
• For. Even though VFP logic would suggest that I flame it into the fiery pits of fchking hell for all the wrong reasons, since that logic is the most inconsequent form of reason I have have ever come across, I vote For. - Vosnul 08:54, 29 October 2006 (UTC)
• For - jack mort | cunt | talk - 13:28, 29 October 2006 (UTC)
• For Much imporved over the crap version I remember. Good job, --Sir Zombiebaron 13:54, 29 October 2006 (UTC)
• Four Teh cl3v3r. --206.82.88.226 16:30, 29 October 2006 (UTC)
  • Above vote was by me. --Señor DiZtheGreat  CUN AOTM ( Worship me!) (Praise me!) (Join me!) AMEN! 16:33, 29 October 2006 (UTC)
• KForC Nothing like a live chicken to eat, keeps the instincts near the surface NeoZidane CUNT Headbutt extraordinaire

______соединяйтесь!

• for passes the chuckle test.-- sannse (talk) 00:35, 30 October 2006 (UTC)
• For because Tom needs to be upgraded to a Commander of the Order. 1337ness! -- §. | WotM | PLS | T | C | A 05:29, 30 October 2006 (UTC)

Uncyclopedian N00b Policy

Score:+5 whining users Featured picture candidate
Trying to write a page, eh? Feel my wrath, n00b! Image credit: FreeMorpheme Archive - Discuss this image

• Self nom. I made this in response to Wikipedia's awful pictures here. As we are an infinitely better site I think we need an infinitely better picture to go with our policies, even if they are joke ones. Then everyone knows where they are: Uncyclopedia=1; N00bs=0; Wikipedia=-10. 07:55, 9 October 2006 (UTC)
• Yikes....and oh...For. You forgot to vote for yourself so I did that for you... -- Brigadier Sir Mordillo GUN UotY WotM FP UotM AotM MI³ AnotM VFH +S 08:03, 9 October 2006 (UTC)
• For - describes our policies perfectly. And a good pic. ~ Ghelæ ^talk_contribs 15:06, 9 October 2006 (UTC)
• For---Asteroid B612 (aka Rataube) - Ñ 23:29, 9 October 2006 (UTC)
• Against. --Uncyclon - Do we still link to BENSON? 23:37, 9 October 2006 (UTC)
• For, although it could be brighter/more contrasted. Drat, I shoulda said that at Reefer. Ah, well. -- §. | WotM | PLS | T | C | A 23:49, 9 October 2006 (UTC)
• Against --Micoolio101 01:13, 10 October 2006 (UTC)
• For per Micoolio101. - Sikon 01:56, 10 October 2006 (UTC)
• Conditional Against This Vote Is To Be Counted As A For If: There are bubbles; The "water" looks like water; It becomes less of an inside joke which is likely to scare away first time users. Zombiebaron reserves the right to determine if these conditions are met. --The Zombiebaron 02:13, 10 October 2006 (UTC)

I spent ages on those bubbles, ZB, damn ya. 07:23, 10 October 2006 (UTC)

What bubbles! --The Zombiebaron 11:41, 10 October 2006 (UTC)

How dare you! Can I please ask everyone to click on the image to see it in its full glory, bubbles and all, before they vote. Honestly, just because they're not round... 17:21, 10 October 2006 (UTC)

The fact that I had to click the image "to see it in its full glory", and to tell the the "bubbles" weren't dirt on my screen, is yet anouther reason why it shoudln't be featured. Featured images should be funny at Main Page Size (M/S) not at Click On Size (COS). --The Zombiebaron 23:57, 10 October 2006 (UTC)

• For But I reckon it would be better as an animated .gif. Baby swims - jaws slam down - head flies off - blood everywhere. It'll have 'em on their feet all over Doncaster. --Sir Hardwick Fundlebuggy (Bleat) 07:46, 10 October 2006 (UTC)
  • No. Animated GIFs are EXTREMELY annoying. - Sikon 09:50, 10 October 2006 (UTC)
• For. Meh, I have grown to like it. -- Hindleyite 16:48, 11 October 2006 (UTC)
• For, works for me -- sannse (talk) 20:07, 11 October 2006 (UTC)
• For. So true!! Love it. -- 21:39, 11 October 2006 (UTC)
• за. For 00:59, 12 October 2006 (UTC)
  • D'oh. An automated translation. Stop playing a Russian, one would never say that. - Sikon 11:43, 12 October 2006 (UTC)
• Against. -- Sir C  Holla | CUN 03:25, 12 October 2006 (UTC)
• Against: Oh great, we don't like new users, let's eat babies, that's so funny but not really. On top of that, the image is too big and the quality is meh. --Sir gwax (talk) 15:48, 13 October 2006 (UTC)
• Weak Against I kinda like the idea, but its almost impossible to see the baby, and I sorta agree with Gwax that the whole eating babies thing aint very funny. -- Kaizer the Bjorn takkun (nya nya) (1961 model!) Check out T61! 18:24, 14 October 2006 (UTC)
• Weak yay. Not particularly funny in itself, but in the context of the acutal Wikipedia images, quite clever. - NewMess1ah 22:21, 14 October 2006 (UTC)
• Against, it's only funny in the context of the Wikipedia images. As such it would go better on a page, vice standalone.--Sir Modusoperandi ^Boinc! 02:51, 15 October 2006 (UTC)
• For. I can't explain, but the caption next to the huge jaw makes me laugh. Go figure.--Procopius 02:36, 17 October 2006 (UTC)
• ForThat looks like a fossil too.--Witt, of UNion Entertain me* 04:52, 17 October 2006 (UTC)
• For. - Simple but good, stylish and damp. - Jack Mort | TALK | MUN | F@H - 13:13, 19 October 2006 (UTC)
• For biting n00bs. --User:Nintendorulez 16:35, 22 October 2006 (UTC)
• Against No reason required nor given. » Brig Sir Dawg | t | v | c » 08:11, 27 October 2006 (UTC)
• Against. While this picture is funny, the thought of having this on the front page, potentially telling n00bs who don't know any better to stay away, terrifies me.--<<>> 15:45, 28 October 2006 (UTC)

• Comment: If the n00bs are so stupid that they wouldn't get/be offended at a joke like this, than that's not the kind of n00b we want. -- §. | WotM | PLS | T | C | A 19:19, 28 October 2006 (UTC)

• Comment. Dude, All n00bs are stupid. It's, like, rule #1 of dealing with n00bs. "Forgive their incredible stupidity."--<<>> 02:45, 29 October 2006 (UTC)

Previously Featured Pictures

These images have already been featured.

Do not put any further votes on this page.

Use PFP instead.

Mohammed Cartoon (?)

Score:+15 Danish cities nuked Featured picture candidate
Islamic extremists are unsure how to react to this sketch of what may or may not be the back of Mohammad's head. Image credit: Modusoperandi Archive - Discuss this image

Featured For simplicity's sake and since I was linking his name, I used "Mohammad" (the most common spelling I've seen) and removed the choose tags. —rc (t) 05:47, 30 October 2006 (UTC)

• Nom and for. I laughed so hard at this... --User:Nintendorulez 21:29, 26 October 2006 (UTC)
• For: Best image on the page at the moment. ---Rev. Isra (talk) 21:39, 26 October 2006 (UTC)
• For Hehe, he's wearing a silly hat thing. *Notices everyone staring menacingly*... Erm, I mean "that's a funny picure".--Kenmcfa 21:49, 26 October 2006 (UTC)
• For, it was one of the first original pics that I put on Uncyc (for Freedom of speech, natch)...and a friend stumbled across it recently and asked what the thing on his head was; it's a Danish, obviously. Lemon, if memory serves.--Sir Modusoperandi ^Boinc! 22:24, 26 October 2006 (UTC)
• Weak Against. This joke deserves a better picture. If it was anyone else, I'd vote for, but Modus' PS skills are well-proven so the bar should be a bit higher. 23:29, 26 October 2006 (UTC)

  discussion moved to talkpage

• For. Oh my God, that IS a Danish on his head!--<<>> 00:10, 27 October 2006 (UTC)
• For. Its hilarious. -- Sir C  Holla | CUN 03:45, 27 October 2006 (UTC)
• For It's a riot. Get it? -- » Sir Savethemooses Grand Commanding Officer ... holla atcha boy» 04:07, 27 October 2006 (UTC)
• For. But since it may or may not be the back of the head of Mohammed, Does this state of being rely on the possible decay of a nucleus of an atom ? - Vosnul 06:11, 27 October 2006 (UTC)
• For Most original and funniest picture I have seen on this page in quite some time, aside from those crazy bears in the header (Hitler, Stalin, and Yaltabear Conference - funny stuff!). » Brig Sir Dawg | t | v | c » 08:15, 27 October 2006 (UTC)
• For. ~ Ghelæ ^talk_contribs 10:05, 27 October 2006 (UTC)
• For, about time something hand-drawn made it to Uncyc and subsequently VFP. --220.240.146.137 10:36, 27 October 2006 (UTC) Oops. --Uncyclon - Do we still link to BENSON? 10:39, 27 October 2006 (UTC)
• For per OsirisX. -- §. | WotM | PLS | T | C | A 14:57, 27 October 2006 (UTC)
• For. Oh noes! --EMC ^[TALK] 07:15, 28 October 2006 (UTC)
• Weak For Image contains vanity. The signature is not needed regardless if it seems appropriate for the joke. It's just like signing an article. 16:00, 28 October 2006 (UTC)

  discussion moved to talkpage

• For --Sir Zombiebaron 16:04, 28 October 2006 (UTC)
• For. Original drawings on VFP?!? I like it. And yes, it's gotta be a Danish on his head. -- Hindleyite 20:43, 28 October 2006 (UTC)

Dead Funny

Score:+8.5 Forgotten Sons Featured picture candidate
The Tomb of the Unknown Uncyclopedian. Image credit: Mhaille Archive - Discuss this image

Featured —rc (t) 04:34, 27 October 2006 (UTC)

Because EMC voted For twice, the Noob image above should have been featured instead of this one. Sorry I missed that until it was too late. —rc (t) 04:46, 27 October 2006 (UTC)

• Don't often Self Nom and For but I'd really like to see this on the front page. :) -- Sir Mhaille  (talk to me) 15:15, 4 October 2006 (UTC)
• Fer He linked me. ooooohhohohh Sliferjam ~ This is my new signature. Cool huh? 16:10, 4 October 2006 (UTC)
• For, though you misspelled humor, Mhaille.--<<>> 17:42, 4 October 2006 (UTC)

  For. British spelling is more cultured and, therefore, superior to American. Obviously. That's why it was the Oscar Wilde meme and not the Walt Whitman meme.--Sir Modusoperandi ^Boinc! 17:52, 4 October 2006 (UTC) Abstain. That it's not two gravestones and lacks a pithy comment on the stone (as was suggested in Reefer Desk) is souring my vote. But I reserve the right to change my mind, again, later on. I do that sometimes.--Sir Modusoperandi ^Boinc! 20:17, 5 October 2006 (UTC)

• For Not too shabby.. --Kenmcfa 21:39, 4 October 2006 (UTC)
• For. --Uncyclon - Do we still link to BENSON? 00:33, 5 October 2006 (UTC)
• For --EMC ^[TALK] 01:22, 5 October 2006 (UTC)
• For WAHOO CANADIAN SPELLINGS! --The Zombiebaron 01:30, 5 October 2006 (UTC)
• Against--Spin 01:58, 5 October 2006 (UTC)
• Against I'm quickly losing all hope for VFP's future. —rc (t) 02:02, 5 October 2006 (UTC)

  Is nothing we do good enough for you? Whaaa! <flees page, crying> --Sir Modusoperandi ^Boinc! 02:19, 5 October 2006 (UTC)

• Against, Agree with RC. Some of the notions of image quality and such attributes people have are diverse at least and utterly strange at most. -Vosnul 08:55, 5 October 2006 (UTC)
• For. Strange is what we like about Mhaille. -- Brigadier Sir Mordillo GUN UotY WotM FP UotM AotM MI³ AnotM VFH +S 11:21, 5 October 2006 (UTC)
• For..... 12:54, 5 October 2006 (UTC)

  I would bet a hundred dollars that if I made an self-nominated an image like this, it would be off of the VFP page in a matter of minutes. --Sir Tripod2282 cun vfp talk Active ~19:48, 5 October 2006 (UTC)

Well duh. That's because it would suck if you did it. 13:06, 12 October 2006 (UTC)

• Against. Ummm, what the fark? --ANIDN MENOSCWICZ 15:50, 6 October 2006 (UTC)
• Against... Gee wiz... ~ sin($) ^tan(€) 18:42, 6 October 2006 (UTC)
• Against. Mhaille, I hate you now. — Major Sir Hinoa (Plead) (KUN) (18:59, 6 October 2006 (UTC))
• For. It's brilliant, 'Nuff said, Although it would be cooler if it was actually like a grave in the ground. The Freed Mind Sutoth the Black Mage [FACEHOLE HERE] [MUN] [YvJP]I am not a Hitler. 23:31, 6 October 2006 (UTC)
• No. I will not allow it. -- Kaizer the Bjorn takkun (nya nya) (1961 model!) Check out T61! 17:31, 7 October 2006 (UTC)
• Against. Sorry Mhaille...Dont really find this one funny. -- Sir C  Holla | CUN 19:18, 7 October 2006 (UTC)
• For In requiem --Roger The Bum Full sig!
  <a href="http://rdoger6424.jaywebdesigns.com/recipient.php">psychotomimetic</a>
  CLICK HERE!!!!!!!! 04:55, 8 October 2006 (UTC)
• For. I really need a script that automatically votes "for" any of Mhaille's images. Save time and all that. -- Sir Codeine K·H·P·B·M·N·C·U·Bu. · (Harangue) 12:18, 10 October 2006 (UTC)
• I suppose I have to vote for. ~ Ghelæ ^talk_contribs 14:52, 10 October 2006 (UTC)
• I love this image. But maybe a transparent background instead of white would look better in the box. --Keitei, in mourning for the loss of our dear Humour 14:58, 10 October 2006 (UTC)

I already uploaded Image:Deadfunnytomb.png, which has transparent background, but Mhaille wanted his to be featured. So Mhaille, now two people want the .png. :D --The Zombiebaron 00:00, 11 October 2006 (UTC)

• F-F-For Oh rapier, why did you leave me?--Witt, of UNion Entertain me* 04:57, 11 October 2006 (UTC)
• Against The humour's in the text, not the image --Jamtrousers 20:48, 11 October 2006 (UTC)
• For Mhaille threatened to cut me if I didn't. --Sir ENeGMA (talk) GUN WotM PLS 22:48, 11 October 2006 (UTC)
• Against *sporks his eyeballs out* Good text, though. » Brig Sir Dawg | t | v | c » 08:56, 12 October 2006 (UTC)
• For Mhaille told me to vote. --  Skiddles (talk)
• FOR see previous commment from above user, beaten into voting, the way it should be--Weedwacker 13:47, 12 October 2006 (UTC)
• Against: As Jamtrousers points out, the humor is in the text; ask yourselves, could we change the text and have a better image or could we remove the text and have a viable image. --Sir gwax (talk) 15:58, 13 October 2006 (UTC)
• Against: Because the image itself doesn't look like a photo. Where's the grass? the other tombs in the background? the fancy symbol on the grave to show someone almost cared? ---Rev. Isra (talk) 18:32, 13 October 2006 (UTC)
• For --EMC ^[TALK] 18:33, 14 October 2006 (UTC)
  • Comment Voting twice...not cromulent. —rc (t) 04:46, 27 October 2006 (UTC)
• Nay. - Very fitting that the image itself is not funny. - NewMess1ah 22:21, 14 October 2006 (UTC)
• Sympathy For. - Well made image but lazy, not even any grass or mud, just text on grey. not very interesting, or funny either. - Jack Mort | TALK | MUN | F@H - 13:09, 19 October 2006 (UTC)
• For. I think it's simplistic nature is where it's true beauty lies. Can't you feel the emotion? --Anyone 15:23, 20 October 2006 (UTC)
• For 62.0.106.156 21:34, 24 October 2006 (UTC)
• For. Hehee. -- 22:12, 25 October 2006 (UTC)
• Against. Just doesn't make me laugh. --User:Nintendorulez 22:18, 26 October 2006 (UTC)

Field Navigation

Score:+9 confused engineers Featured picture candidate
In the United States of America they use the Imperial System, which employs such units of measure as "football fields". The original British form is of measure is "football pitches"; however, in order not to confuse baseball fans it has been changed to "football fields". Image credit: Zombiebaron Archive - Discuss this image

Featured —rc (t) 06:00, 24 October 2006 (UTC)

• Self Nomination and For I made this and it got a pretty firm ingnoring on PHP. So, I'm nominationing it anyway. --Sir Zombiebaron 22:28, 14 October 2006 (UTC)

Nobody uses the metric system in the UK. Not willingly, anyway. 19:24, 15 October 2006 (UTC)

• First, For. Second, the caption. Isn't Buffalo in the U.S? Also, the Football field in the background is for American Football, not soccer. I would change the caption to say "In the U.S.A. they use "The Customary System", which employs such units of measure as "football fields" and Bushels." -- §. | WotM | PLS | T | C | A 19:48, 15 October 2006 (UTC)
• Conditional for, if you totally Britain-ize or American-ize it. I don't think there's a 'Buffalo' in Britain (since, y'know, there's not many buffalo there), and proper Brits would never call it a 'field'- it's a pitch. -- cdr. thetoastman tlk ctr cun f@h 21:59, 15 October 2006 (UTC)

Okay you two, I changed it. My original intent was to have an increased "WTF Factor", but I guess this'll do, eh? --Sir Zombiebaron 17:45, 16 October 2006 (UTC)

• For Buffalo is just as dreary in real life.--Witt, of UNion Entertain me* 04:54, 17 October 2006 (UTC)
• For. ~ Ghelæ ^talk_contribs 15:41, 17 October 2006 (UTC)
• For. Because I come from Buffalo and I rather liked the Sabres. --Sir Tripod2282 cun vfp talk Active ~21:45, 18 October 2006 (UTC)
• Against. - quite a simple photoshop and the joke wasn't that... good. - Jack Mort | TALK | MUN | F@H - 13:16, 19 October 2006 (UTC)
• Against. --Uncyclon - Do we still link to BENSON? 08:23, 20 October 2006 (UTC)
• For. The front page needs more random zaniness...... -- Sir Mhaille  (talk to me) 15:22, 20 October 2006 (UTC)
• For. Because, and also Most Assuredly. --Anyone 15:21, 20 October 2006 (UTC)
• For because I'm feeling sympathetic--Shandon 15:35, 20 October 2006 (UTC)

• For meh...not in a good mood... The HRH MuCal. Tayor MUN (Praise!) (CMC!)
• For Because he only needs one more vote... and it's quite amusing --Olipro Anchor KUN (Harass) 15:56, 20 October 2006 (UTC)
• Against. Sorry ZB, but I agree w/Osirisx's well reasoned rational. I've pondered this pic and its predecessor ever since they appeared on Reefer Desk, but the idea is still filling me with meh.--Sir Modusoperandi ^Boinc! 16:47, 20 October 2006 (UTC)
• Against. I just dont find this funny. -- Sir C  Holla | CUN 19:44, 22 October 2006 (UTC)
• Against. Only slightly funny.---Asteroid B612 (aka Rataube) - Ñ 09:33, 23 October 2006 (UTC)
• For. because he said he'll vote back when i want I love measuring in football fields, WOOOOOT NeoZidane CUNT Headbutt extraordinaire

______соединяйтесь!

• For. Ditto Zid. :) -- 22:20, 23 October 2006 (UTC)
• For Please don't hurt me Mhaille! Zombie made me do it! --Sir ENeGMA (talk) GUN WotM PLS 22:46, 23 October 2006 (UTC)

Awards, Decorations and Honours

Ranks:  Admin Rank · Ninjastars · Order of Uncyclopedia · Rate your admins!

Awards:  Awards, Decorations and Honours · Noob of the Moment · Potatochopper of the Month · Uncyclopedian of the Month · Writer of the Month · Comeback of the Year · Potatochopper of the Year · Uncyclopedian of the Year · Writer of the Year

Limelight:  Featured Articles · Hall of Shame · Vote for Highlight · Vote for Pictures

Top Ten:  2023 · 2022 · 2021 · 2020 · 2019 · 2018 · 2017 · 2016 · 2015 · 2014 · 2013 · 2012 · 2011 · 2010 · 2009 · 2008 · 2007 · 2006 · 2005

Special Awards:  FFS · Sandwich of the Month · Useless Gobshite of the Month · Useless Gobshite of the Year

Special Events:  Aristocrat's Turkey Day Ball · Happy Monkey Competition · *Kiss My Ass* Holiday Competition · Poo Lit Surprise · The Article Whisperer · Other competitions

---