Uncyclopedia talk:VFH/User:Orian57/UnProvise/UPR/Historical Drama

Comment. whoops! I don't think you can nominate stuff that's in userspace or stuff that hasn't been reviewed! Other than that, I think it's featureable in the near future.   Le Cejak • <16:28, 02 Jun 2008>

Oh really...me apologies then. However, submitting it to Pee may be a little pointless, because according to UnProvise rules you're not really allowed to go back and make any changes, unless they're spelling/wording/grammar changes. Also I think UnProvise will probably stay in userspace, because it'll be quite a job moving it into mainspace, especially since the number of UnProvise pages is slowly growing (and there area already quite a few and lots of things would mess up when moving pages)... - [16:35 2 June] Sir FSt. Don Pleb Yettie (talk) QotF BFF NotM RotM UNPotM UGotM CUN PEE SR UnProvise

But mainspace is probablly good. I can help you move those pages. --¿Qua? es mi página de discusión, es lo que mi contribuiría 16:36, 2 June 2008 (UTC)

Yes, but it's not only moving pages (which could be quite problematic because a lot of double-redirects would be created) but also categories and various links that could be broken. I mean it's not impossible, just quite a bit of work. And first we need permission from the powers that be and the community... But maybe somewhere like Uncyclopedia:UnProvise (like pee review) or even UnProvise:Blah blah? I guess this isn't the place to discuss it. - [16:39 2 June] Sir FSt. Don Pleb Yettie (talk) QotF BFF NotM RotM UNPotM UGotM CUN PEE SR UnProvise

Viva la forums! Just hit it up the dump and post a topic about wether or not it should be namespaced. I'd probably be no more than a days worth of work for me, and maybe about 10 minutes for a good bot. Lieutenant THEDUDEMAN Dude ... Totally UOTM KUN GotA F@H 16:45, 2 June 2008 (UTC)

According to Uncyclopedia:VFH/rules "Any article from any namespace is eligible for nomination." so it's a valid nom from that point of view. As this is a collaboration with no 1 main author I also don't think it needs a Pee Review, although I may be wrong on this second point. MrN 17:09, Jun 2

THEDUDEMAN: I will start a dump topic, right now. I know it would only be about a day's work but I'm meant to be quite busy now, what with exams and stuff... And also that's what I thought, MrN! This is turning out to be quite a big comment section. Thanks for advice/input or whatever they call it nowadays! - [17:15 2 June] Sir FSt. Don Pleb Yettie (talk) QotF BFF NotM RotM UNPotM UGotM CUN PEE SR UnProvise

I'd say that UnProvise needs some time to mature as a new form of article writing before it's featurable. I thought this was a great UnProvise, especially because it was one of the first good ones. (And I participated in it!) But the other UnProvisers need to learn the rules about keeping things out of script format and staying a little more uniform with the idea before this gets to be featurable stuff. ~Minitrue Sir SysRq! Talk! Sex! =/ GUN • WotM • RotM • AotM • VFH • SK • PEEING • HP • BFF @ 17:57 Jun 2

Script formatting was getting a little annoying yesterday, but it seems to be under control now... - [17:59 2 June] Sir FSt. Don Pleb Yettie (talk) QotF BFF NotM RotM UNPotM UGotM CUN PEE SR UnProvise

Like I said, people just need time to get used to it. It's such an innovative concept that people aren't sure what to make of it yet. ~Minitrue Sir SysRq! Talk! Sex! =/ GUN • WotM • RotM • AotM • VFH • SK • PEEING • HP • BFF @ 18:04 Jun 2

Like when you find a revolutionary on your doorstep... - [18:09 2 June] Sir FSt. Don Pleb Yettie (talk) QotF BFF NotM RotM UNPotM UGotM CUN PEE SR UnProvise

Or an M&M in your bellybutton. I've got no problem with Unprovises(?) being featured, but I do agree this needs a bit more time to get comfortable. I couldn't care less if it stays in your user space, but if this takes off (and I hope it does) it will need to eventually be mainspaced. So for now, against. This is great though. -OptyC Sucks! CUN18:26, 2 Jun