| Article: UnNews:Darwin's egg found in museum
|
Score: -1 Intelligently Designed Darwins
|
| Nominated by:
|
 Rev. Zim_ulator (Talk) I am the dirt under your rollers 12:18, 17 April 2009 (UTC)
|
For: 4
|
- nom and for - An eggselent eggsample of UnNews; so pretty I didn't edit a thing. Rev. Zim_ulator (Talk) I am the dirt under your rollers 12:18, 17 April 2009 (UTC)
- Very For. —Sir Socky
   (talk) (stalk)  GUN SotM UotM PMotM UotY PotM WotM 18:40, 17 April 2009 (UTC)
 For. I like the idea to vote yes. --Romartus 21:47, 17 April 2009 (UTC)- For Rather funny, probably wont get featured but is is quite well thought out and some effort went into it --Sir DJ ~ Irreverent
     01:57, 19 April 2009 (UTC)
|
Against: 5
|
- Against. So, the premise is that the egg they found last weekend that Darwin collected is an egg that hatches miniature Charles Darwins? Hmmmm. I guess that's sort of amusing, but not feature-worthy.
 pillow talk 20:43, 17 April 2009 (UTC)
- against. a good article, worthy of the unnews front page for sure, but not the front front page in my opinion. SirGerrycheeversGunTalk 20:54, 17 April 2009 (UTC)
- Against. Doesn't click. I do like the first person reporting at the end, though. I'm the only one. I'm really quite lonely. Sir Modusoperandi Boinc! 04:24, 18 April 2009 (UTC)
- Against. --Docile hippopotamus 09:34, 18 April 2009 (UTC)
 Against. Sir Starnestommy  (Talk • Contribs • CUN) 10:32, Apr. 18, 2009
|
VFH
← Back to summary VFH
← Back to full VFH
Rev. Zim_ulator (Talk) I am the dirt under your rollers 12:18, 17 April 2009 (UTC)
For. I like the idea to vote yes. --
Against. 
