| Article: Raka
|
Score: -3
|
| Nominated by:
|
Ruffel 11:59, 20 August 2009 (UTC)
|
For: 3
|
- For. Ruffel 11:59, 20 August 2009 (UTC)
- For. 59.94.119.41 12:01, 20 August 2009 (UTC)
- For. Tukkoo 12:02, 20 August 2009 (UTC)
- For. 78.57.61.89 13:37, 20 August 2009 (UTC)
|
Against: 6
|
- Against. WTF ? I am being polite. Also these look to be very dodgy votes (including the admitted double voting).
 RomArtus*Imperator ® (Orate). 13:50, 20 August 2009 (UTC)
- Against+Invalid nomination+Obvious sockpuppetry. —Sir Socky
   (talk) (stalk)  GUN SotM UotM PMotM UotY PotM WotM 08:48, 21 August 2009 (UTC)
- Down with this sort of thing!. -- El Sid, the lazy one • parlez-vous franglais? 16:24, 21 August 2009 (UTC)
- Against. Huh? -- transparent Ape (plagiarise) (Riot Porn) 17:20, 22 August 2009 (UTC)
 Abso-frigging-lutely not 1 bad writing style 2 bad grammar 3 no laughs 4 no concept 5 three votes in three minutes, including one IP vote 6 self-Nom with no PEE 7 significant edits during VFH 8 Absolute loathing 9 Just plain NO Pup t 19:23, 23/08/2009- Against as per POTR's excellent reasons. • • • Necropaxx (T) {~} 19:30, Aug 23
|
| Comments
|
- Comment. Accidentally clicked for 'FOR' 2 times :( Tukkoo 12:18, 20 August 2009 (UTC)
- Go, little nomination, go! I BELIEVE in you!!! --S0.S0S.0S.0S0 23:52, 20 August 2009 (UTC)
|
VFH
← Back to summary VFH
← Back to full VFH
Abso-frigging-lutely not 1 bad writing style 2 bad grammar 3 no laughs 4 no concept 5 three votes in three minutes, including one IP vote 6 self-Nom with no PEE 7 significant edits during VFH 8 Absolute loathing 9 Just plain NO 
