Uncyclopedia:VFH/G-Rex (post pee=42)

Article: G-Rex	Score: -1
Nominated by:	Funnybony 04:21, January 24, 2010 (UTC)
For: 2	For Funnybony 04:23, January 24, 2010 (UTC) For There is an example of wrongly attempted Polish in the first line. I like it! Sir Ptok-Bentoniczny^{Pisz tutaj} • KUN 21:18, January 25, 2010 (UTC)
Against: 3	Against. Namedropping, randomness, redundancy, and a poorly-defined concept are all holding this one back. • • • Necropaxx (T) {~} Sunday, 06:09, Jan 24 2010 Against. I actually like the idea of a cartooonishly huge dinosaur, and I think this is your best yet, Funnybony, but it still needs work. It's a bit random, namedroppy, self-referential, angry for no reason in places (other dolts?) and never really settles on an idea for long enough. You're heading in the right direction, but you're not there yet dude. --UU - natter 12:08, Jan 25 Against. I say 'lose the gee-whizz' kid tone and you will have got my vote for this. *RomArtusImperator ®** (Orate) 08:08, January 26, 2010 (UTC)
Comments	Done been peed on=42, and corrected. Nothing to lose so I'll give it a VFH micro-chance. The worst thing that can happen is the material existence explodes. Because then the G-Rex will re-emerge.--Funnybony 04:21, January 24, 2010 (UTC) Abstain. I like the article, but I'm not sure it'd make for a good featured article, yet. Also per the against votes. —Sir Socky (talk) (stalk) GUN SotM UotM PMotM UotY PotM WotM 17:31, 25 January 2010