Talk:A bunch of aristocrats fucking. Awesome vid
No favorites? I expected there to be more favs. Genital Sniper 00:50, 3 January 2008 (UTC)
(Wipes tear) Beautiful! NumberJunkie 01:25, 10 December 2007 (UTC)
- Agreed! I laughed. I cried. A piddled a little. And I thought the original Aristocrats page was funny. Muzak 05:17, 4 January 2008 (UTC)
Stupid question: Have you considered PNG or GIF to get rid of the artifacts? – Sir Skullthumper, MD (criticize • writings • critchat) 21:24 Jan 01, 2008
- That's not a stupid question at all. I have no idea what you're talking about. What are artefacts? I thought it was quite good now. All that's really needed is to change the grey header bits to white, but I have no idea how to do that without starting all over again. -- 15Mickey20 (talk to Mickey) 22:01, 1 January 2008 (UTC)
- Artifacts are those little mess ups in the image that don't make it look like a horseshit image instead of real HTML page. ~
Jacques Pirat, Esq. Converse : Benefactions : U.w.p.
1/01/2008 @ 23:25- Done, Remade images to a somewhat higher quality. Well the top images of course, you should see a dramatic increase in quality and realism. --NXWave 13:22, 4 January 2008 (UTC)
- Artifacts are those little mess ups in the image that don't make it look like a horseshit image instead of real HTML page. ~
Spam's missing :(, but it's great though --FeTzu 13:59, 3 January 2008 (UTC)
ROFL! I thought this was another aristocrats joke, but it was more than that :D You really can't unsee this!
- how'd it get featured twice? Iateyourgranny 20:46, 21 February 2009 (UTC)
- Every year, a vote is held for the top ten articles of the past 12 months. These ten then get refeatured at the start of February. This article came third. Go here for the full list. -- 15Mickey20 (talk to Mickey) 16:24, 22 February 2009 (UTC)
Additionally[edit source]
I sincerely hope that this isn't an actual video. --SPY 13:44, 3 January 2008 (UTC)
- Must...hold...back..urge..to....RICK ROLL. -- Thankful Kippy Share blessings Bountiful harvest 14:06, Jan. 3, 2008
- Youtube used to look like this?!! -- random person
The images don't line up[edit source]
On my 1600x1200 resolution, it doesn't look like a YouTube page. The video/comments image is shifted to the right.
My appreciation[edit source]
I know this is an old page, but I still wanted to say that I have never laughed harder on an uncyclopedia page, even after second reading.--EveryOtherUsernameWasTaken(get dtf) 17:55, 3 September 2014 (UTC)