Forum:Votes to op an unskilled and a mostly uninterested editor
Wikipedia's rules state that a candidate for adminship should be a skilled and interested editor. Well, I declare that I've spent ten years on Wikipedia and have single-handedly created, discussed and modified all of Wikipedia's content using my numerous sock accounts, which should show you how interested I am in...
Wait, I have a funny feeling this isn't the right site.
Ok, let's try again. Uncyclopedia rules don't state anything about what an appropriate candidate for sysop should be or look like, so, after rereading the unexistant rules enough times to assure myself I fit all the criteria, I decided to place this request here. To justify myself, here is what I promise:
- Unlike many other administrators, whose interest in being opped is very clear (and it's obvious nothing good can come out of it), I declare that my interest in becoming an administrator is totally
unclearunexistant. I am entirely uninterested in Uncylopedia and/or its past, present or future; I have a life of my own (depends on what you call life) which doesn't allow me to be present on this site as much as I [don't] wish, which in my humble opinion makes me a suitably uninterested candidate. If you still don't believe me, here is the proof:
- If you check my contributions history, you'll see a lot of pointless edits, justified by the claim that I was interested in what Uncyclopedia would become. Well, that simply means that if anyone is more likely to change and spit on his past errors and all that, it would be me.
- I am pretty sure the title of this forum has an error of some kind, but due to my lack of interest in this site in general snd this forum in particular, I am not going to correct it.
- I am pretty sure putting an image of a pair of birds next to my campaign promises would help me greatly to attract attention, but, as I am clearly uninterested in becoming an admin, I am not going to do that.
- I am not going to promote myself on IRC...
- ...And those aren't even proper campaign promises!
- Still not convinced? To add insult to whatever comes before it, I also proclaim my disgraceful lack of wiki-skills, which means that it often takes me more than ten edits to do a small fix, if it requires knowing how to format. Which should make an even more suitable candidate for opping, seeing how skillful some of the self-unproclaimed admins are.
That being said, if anyone were to vote for or against my opping, I wouldn't greatly appreciate or unappreciate (wait, does this even word even exist?) this, being so uninterested in the result of the voting. I'd thank you for your attention, except that I am entirely apathetic about all this. Anton (talk) 13:03, 27 July 2015 (UTC)
- Seriously speaking though, I know exactly what Uncyclopedia needs. It needs to be turned into an underground fight club! And needless to say, I am entirely up-to-the-task (I once fought with someone when I was thirteen). Anton (talk) 13:08, 27 July 2015 (UTC)
Votes
For. Anton has been around a long time, knows his stuff, cares about inspiring other writers. I thought he was an admin already. today, again, there was no featured article when i logged in. one more decent pair of hands would be more than welcome. --Leverage (talk) 19:17, 27 July 2015 (UTC)- No matter how useless and irrelevant this shitty, countryless website gets, the cardinal rule will forever persist that you do not ask to become an op and also maybe if you're feeling in a good mood and you're only interacting with editors you like then somethings you try not to be a dick or at least less dickish, also something about being funny maybe was in there too? I forgot the rules of this place. --Argylesocks (talk) 08:56, 28 July 2015 (UTC)
- For. If this worked for Woodburninator it MIGHT work for Anton. 11:41, 28 July 2015 (UTC)
Against. Changed my mind. 03:33, 31 July 2015 (UTC)- Mine was cooler ;) The Woodburninator
The vote was legitimate! ™ 12:21, 28 July 2015 (UTC)
- Against. The Woodburninator was just asking to be opped. Now, once is enough. We're not going to fall for it again. MUN MyOwnBadSelf, The BFDI Fan (talk - stalk - block) 22:47, 29 July 2015 (UTC)
- In no way was I actually asking to be opped. That outcome was... unexpected. The Woodburninator The vote was legitimate! ™ 12:14, 30 July 2015 (UTC)
- In no way was I actually asking to be opped. That outcome was... unexpected. The Woodburninator
- seriously? Do we even need a vote. Just op Anton. The site is decaying. If making a user an op (and its a user worth being opped) will add energy and ideas...do it. Just op him now. ShabiDOO 22:34, 30 July 2015 (UTC)√
- For This takes auto-fellatio to a whole new level. ~Sir Frosty (Talk to me!)
23:28, 30 July 2015 (UTC) - Undecided Anton would make a great admin. However, he is already a great writer. We need both writers and admins. Most of those who were made admins quit writing once they became admins. True, it was fun for a day to watch more than 10 new admins abuse their powers on each other, but it wore off after a week, and now most of the admins on this site hang out on IRC instead of writing anything for the site. Once you give the prize out, the incentive is gone. 50.135.190.43 (talk) 01:33, 31 July 2015 (UTC)
- For. He's attentive and likely to do shit, etc. ~EveryOtherUsernameWasTaken(dtf?) 12:46, 31 July 2015 (UTC)
For. Anton has been around a long time, knows his stuff, cares about inspiring other writers. I thought he was an admin already. today, again, there was no featured article when i logged in. one more decent pair of hands would be more than welcome. --
Against. Changed my mind. 03:33, 31 July 2015 (UTC)
Thank you
Thank you for voting, everyone, whether it was for or against me! Now, watch Uncyclopedia turn into a fight club. Anton (talk) 21:47, 3 August 2015 (UTC)
