Forum:Chron interview in this month's .net Magazine
Just for those that haven't noticed yet, an interview with Chron is a feature in this month's .net Magazine. It can be read online here:
http://www.netmag.co.uk/zine/discover-interview/the-brains-behind-uncyclopedia
I haven't bought a copy of the mag yet but I assume it's in there as well. Uncyc in the mainstream media, yeah. -- Hindleyite Converse • ?pedia 16:29, 17 March 2007 (UTC)
- Woo! Nice. —Braydie 16:40, 17 March 2007 (UTC)
- You just had to mention the doody, didn't you? t o m p k i n s blah. ﺞوﻦ וףה ՃՄ ண்ஸ ފއހ วอฏม +տ trade websites 18:36, 17 March 2007 (UTC)
- Haha, that was one of my contributions! It's important that people know about the yuky doody. —rc (t) 18:38, 17 March 2007 (UTC)
- Wow, the preschool teacher in you is really coming out these days, Rc. t o m p k i n s blah. ﺞوﻦ וףה ՃՄ ண்ஸ ފއހ วอฏม +տ trade websites 18:41, 17 March 2007 (UTC)
- Brains? Behind? -- Sir Mhaille (talk to me)
- I was going to contribute to the responses on the mailing list, but I'm too lazy to log out of my e-mail and into the one I use for the mailing list. Otherwise there would have been a lot more direct mention of Savethemooses. -- 04:05, 18 March 2007 (UTC)
- I too am disappointed at the lack of Savethemooses in the interview. --Sir ENeGMA (talk) GUN WotM PLS 14:05, 18 March 2007 (UTC)
- We should let the public decide how much STM is an adequate amount. --Sir Modusoperandi Boinc! 19:59, 18 March 2007 (UTC)...
- A lot. STM should basically become Bureaucrat. I don't know why he isn't. --Crazyswordsman...With SAVINGS!!!! (T/C) 02:54, 19 March 2007 (UTC)
- We should let the public decide how much STM is an adequate amount. --Sir Modusoperandi Boinc! 19:59, 18 March 2007 (UTC)...
- I too am disappointed at the lack of Savethemooses in the interview. --Sir ENeGMA (talk) GUN WotM PLS 14:05, 18 March 2007 (UTC)
- I was going to contribute to the responses on the mailing list, but I'm too lazy to log out of my e-mail and into the one I use for the mailing list. Otherwise there would have been a lot more direct mention of Savethemooses. -- 04:05, 18 March 2007 (UTC)
- Brains? Behind? -- Sir Mhaille (talk to me)
- Wow, the preschool teacher in you is really coming out these days, Rc. t o m p k i n s blah. ﺞوﻦ וףה ՃՄ ண்ஸ ފއހ วอฏม +տ trade websites 18:41, 17 March 2007 (UTC)
- Haha, that was one of my contributions! It's important that people know about the yuky doody. —rc (t) 18:38, 17 March 2007 (UTC)
- You just had to mention the doody, didn't you? t o m p k i n s blah. ﺞوﻦ וףה ՃՄ ண்ஸ ފއހ วอฏม +տ trade websites 18:36, 17 March 2007 (UTC)
Heh heh. I'm sad I was out of town for all this. 16:10, 22 March 2007 (UTC)
Hey, look! This topic is a day old, and it's already got it's first poll. Soon it'll take it's first step. Aww...
You are not entitled to view results of this poll before you have voted.
- That poll isn't asking the right question. Use this one. t o m p k i n s blah. ﺞوﻦ וףה ՃՄ ண்ஸ ފއހ วอฏม +տ trade websites 22:16, 18 March 2007 (UTC)
You are not entitled to view results of this poll before you have voted.
- Silly Tompkins - you need options! Like these. --Whhhy?Whut?How? *Back from the dead* 00:39, 19 March 2007 (UTC)
You are not entitled to view results of this poll before you have voted.
You are not entitled to view results of this poll before you have voted.
I'm thinking Motolovnight first. Lt. High Gen. Grue The Few The Proud, The Marines
You are not entitled to view results of this poll before you have voted.
totally... --Olipro Anchor KUN (Harass) 19:38, 22 March 2007 (UTC)
You are not entitled to view results of this poll before you have voted.
I think we're straying from the point rather. This poll, however, is entirely on-topic.
You are not entitled to view results of this poll before you have voted.
--Whhhy?Whut?How? *Back from the dead* 19:44, 22 March 2007 (UTC)