User talk:Cajek/Archive14

My Pee of "Moving the goal posts"

Uncyclopedia:Pee Review/Moving the goal posts
Yew told me before that my review wasn't very good (well, not quite that but yew get what I mean) so I've tried to make it better, make suggestions, and unfortunately I've lowered the score as well (second thoughts). What do yew think? Maybe yew could review my review? haha xD ~Fag x FS

Yeah, thank you for not only going back and redoing it, but for coming me to review yer review! Take a look at what I said: basically it's "long enough" but you could easily say more. Keep it REAL fagatron!   Le Cejak • <-> (Dec 11 / 15:29)

Dam! You and your poison pee!

LoL. This is going to be a lot more trouble than it's worth I expect! Will see what happens I guess... Did you settle on an image? MrN 18:54, Dec 11

Is nothing Secert these days?... Taking a good look at the VFH process I see... I think the main way to win at VFH is to be the right person. Helps a little if the article is good, but a lot of people vote because of the person rather than the article... MrN 18:58, Dec 11

yes, you can never take the 'friend' out of the equation.

That's what I discovered after looking at it. You really have to be the right type of person to get VFH. I'm starting to become one of those people I hope. Or maybe not, I don't know. Nah, I guess not. People vote on VFH based on how much they like the author 80% of the time unless they've never heard of you.   Le Cejak • <-> (Dec 11 / 19:03)

I managed it with The Color Problem but I put a hell of a lot of effort into that one... Not bad for a N00b of 20 days eh? To get one on the front page... :) I'm not sure I want to be one of those people, whoever they are... Did I tell you about my childhood? Ohh! It was soo tough. All the boys picked on me... It was horrible, all the teasing and name calling, they were so nasty to me... I cried and cried. My mother did not help, she just said I should stand up for my self, but none of the other boys like me. It was so horrible... I cried and cried. BANG... I'm fine now thank you Susan... Did you check Uncyclopedian's latest mod to the guide? I can't get though to that kid. Apparently we recommend one paragraph... I thought he agreed that there was no problem with the guide, then seamed to change his mind. WHAT THE BALLS? MrN 19:17, Dec 11

You did a good job on that one! That's basically how it happened with me. I was just like "fuck it, I don't care anymore" and I sat down and wrote J'accuse. One of my reviewers liked it and BANG, there it was. However, VFH is a game of friends, not articles.   Le Cejak • <-> (Dec 11 / 19:21)

Hmm... Are you suggesting that's your best effort? I might actually wither to one of your whores and read it. And have a look at the mod in the guide please, maybe have a word? MrN 19:23, Dec 11

Go to uncyclopedian's talk page. I already said it was okay. Also, I guess I'm whoring so subconsciously now that I'm not realizing it!   Le Cejak • <-> (Dec 11 / 19:25)

RE your previous whore, I'm on 1024*768 resolution and the alignment is a bit messed up in places. It can be fixed with <br clear="all"/> I think... MrN 19:59, Dec 11

idea

i started a page banned users...and i have to ask...is it funny enough to continue...i think its sublime, but...continue or scrap? I have lots of pics of 'freaks of nature' and was going to go thru about 8-9 different offenses...original idea was to link the user to different REAL BANNED users..but ..still deciding on that one

That was, uh, weird. Yeah, needs work but that's what a lot of articles need. I wouldn't talk about real users in an article, that's a big no-no. AT LEAST YOU'RE WRITING! Also, how is this like finnigan's wake?   Le Cejak • <-> (Dec 11 / 19:41)

obviously its not finished, im just hoping people would get the jokes like 'hands' 'juggling' etc..(seems obvious to me at any rate) and obviously the guy IS A SOCK in his own right..oh i was going to do links to PERMABANNED users..like nintendorulz and jason hallameya...people like that...

as for joycean stuff..that will have to be worked on later...i have some bits written down..but most is in my head..and that stuff really takes CAREFUL crafting...an exercise in meticulous 'wordsmithing'

Oh, okay that sounds fine. As for the article, the best I can say is keep going. Are you going to do uncyclopedia in-jokes? Because that only works if you're one of those famous writers I talked about earlier. Instead of letting those articles sit in your head, just write them out.   Le Cejak • <-> (Dec 11 / 19:51)

wasnt planning on it, figured the word jokes and link jokes (53 sockpuppets links to sysoplist) would be good enuff..without relying on cliches' from bygone days...

Hey Finnius, maybe you could suggest an idea for a collab me and you could work on?   Le Cejak • <-> (Dec 11 / 20:07)

And for my next trick

User:MrN9000/G1 What do you think? Gwax has given me the nod that this needs rewriting, and that I would be a good person to do it... Want to get involved? MrN 20:39, Dec 11

lol holy crap! good luck with that! (Maybe you'd like to be a person of the month some time?)   Le Cejak • <-> (Dec 11 / 20:57)

There's an award like that? I had no idea... AE nominated me for it this month, but I got him to remove it...  ;) I'm going to pull the old guide out of the fire and kick the living shit out of it. There is much wrong around here. I'm just getting started... I would appreciate your help with it from time to time though. You know a second opinion and all. But I have got a lot of work to do in it before it's worth someone else looking at it. Hopefully you will give what I have done a read though if I ask you later? MrN 21:04, Dec 11

question: Is this a rewrite of the 25 page craziness that we have... what's the official name for it?   Le Cejak • <-> (Dec 11 / 21:06)

Uncyclopedia:Beginner's_Guide_to_Being_an_Uncyclopedian it's rubbish. And the main reason why a lot of newcomers who come to uncyc do not stick around. Yep. I'm going to re-write it. Hopefully some people will agree that last months N00b of the month winner is a good person to do this. Gwax does anyway. The Pee Review Guide was the warm up... That looks like it's going to take care itself now, so I'm moving onto the beginners... The old hands will not like me messing with it I'm sure, but I'm doing it in my userspace and if its good they can not object... MrN 21:16, Dec 11

Sure I'll take a look at it some time. Good job on all the things yer doin'. Did you see my revision of HTBFANJS?   Le Cejak • <-> (Dec 11 / 21:44)

Will have a look... MrN 23:01, Dec 11

Oh, that. Er... Hmm... Well.... Ummmm, I had already read it actually... Snoop, Snoop...  :) MrN 23:04, Dec 11

Want me to add some questions to it for you to think about? I will not change the text, just add some stuff... You might be interested. MrN 23:05, Dec 11

YOU SNOOPING BASTARD! Yes, add questions! I would be interested to look into 'em!   Le Cejak • <-> (Dec 11 / 23:33)

Oh, your still here! And like your not lookin at what i'm doing with the new guide! (hope you are) I think it funny actually, people think that uncyc is all free and stuff yet, I'm not sure that in real life you have a history of everything recorded, and anyone can monitor your activity all the time... I digress... Anyway. I will have a look. Will put my stuff in bold or something to make it look different... I have to go to bed soon, so can't take too long doing it, but will have a look. MrN 00:08, Dec 12

another idea

hey cajek, i had a thought last night. i know the pee review queue has been shortened lately, probably mostly due to the improved guidlines. my idea is this: should people who sort through the crap of uncyclopedia take the articles that aren't so bad to be VFD'd, yet not great at all, and place them onto pee review? i know that some users, like gwax, pride themselves on deleting crap in mass quantities. i'm sure that while searching for said crap they encounter articles that need ideas and a helpful adopter. i know there's holes in this, like overwhelming the queue with slightly below average articles, and also, just who would fix these articles? i just think if every article in Category:Rewrite had a good review on its talk page as a starting point for a potential re-writer, more would get done. anyway, if you think it's a mildly good idea, we can further discuss it, or if you think its a terrible idea, we can never speak of it again. --SirGerrycheeversGunTalk 00:27, 12 December 2007 (UTC)

Ahh, my Peemon is suggesting more work! Get back in the Pee-Ball!

oh, come on! i just finished one! now there's only three left, and one of them is mine!--SirGerrycheeversGunTalk 00:33, 12 December 2007 (UTC)

lol, I think that's a good idea if people would take responsibility for what they post on pee review! Like if you put up something that's slightly below average and I review it, it would be your responsibility to clean it up. I think that some people do do that because they want to rewrite said articles. Your idea is something worthy of the guide.   Le Cejak • <-> (Dec 12 / 00:36)

/Me Also thinks this sort of question should be discussed on the talk page at Boomers place. Cajek is the king of reviews, but should this not be discussed at Boomers? MrN 00:57, Dec 12

Dam MAN!!! EDIT FUCKING CONFLICT YOU BASTARD! Grr. I'm just going to cut and paste my shit onto the end of what you changed... Balls. MrN 00:47, Dec 12

=D WOOT! EDIT CONFLICT, MY OLD FRIEND!   Le Cejak • <-> (Dec 12 / 00:49)

Re moving the announcement from the front page

I think that's a mistake. Surely important announcement should be on the main page. Is that not what its for?? Stuff which is general chat on the talk page, but announcements would go on the front and not be signed? Maybe move old announcements to a sub-page? But current announcements should be on the main page? MrN 02:19, Dec 12

I think it'll get way the hell too messy, even with a timer on the announcements.   Le Cejak • <-> (Dec 12 / 02:21)

I agree it could get messy, but should the front page not be for anything which is "decided" and anything which is being discussed on the talk page? I'm not really sure... Have to go to bed soon anyway... MrN 02:35, Dec 12

UnWhoring

Hey Cajek,

Check out my new UnWhoring campaign. I did this to remedy all the whoring templates still waiting to be seen: (probably like 30)

Warning:

You were whored once by an evil man who has gone from the dark side to the side of goodness. He has ended his whoring ways. he has crawled out of his swamp of depression. He has taken up golf and fishing. He has shaved his face. He has taken a shower. He has eaten breakfast. He has put on a white suit. He has gone back to work. He has gotten engaged. He has taken away the hot picture that used to be here. This template replaces the evil whoring he once did. He is sorry. This message was paid for with positive energy and love

Nice, eh? I hope this convinces you to UnDesert me, because my talk page grows lonely... You need to join UNSOC! --Major'GUN' Ggarfield, Le Marquis de Nofu .Complex! 02:35, 12 December 2007 (UTC)

DUDE! You just whored me again! Arg! Annoying!!!   Le Cejak • <-> (Dec 12 / 02:42)

Was that a whore? Oh, it's not very well named that template... MrN 02:59, Dec 12

What the hell is a whore doing on my talk page???!??!   Le Cejak • <-> (Dec 12 / 03:00)

It's not normal. It's only going to colour the issue... See, we needed the "random" inspiration to start making jokes about something new... The stimulus has to come from outside in some way... MrN 03:04, Dec 12

J'accuse!!! Why hunt whores? That's not classy, or normal!!   Le Cejak • <-> (Dec 12 / 03:06)

who else? --THINKER 03:03, 12 December 2007 (UTC)

[[I haven't written a single bloody article. I'm a lazy ass. So sue me. Also, I just made you either click or hover over this redlink just so that you could see where it linked. Therefore, I now take this opportunity to laugh at you. HAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAAAAAAAA!!!! HA!|Me!]] Unsolicited conversation Extravagant beauty PEEING 05:03, 12 December 2007 (UTC) Well, that worked like crap. What the hell?

How did that count as whoring? :(, :'( (WAAAA!)

Major'GUN' Ggarfield, Le Marquis de Nofu .Complex! 05:09, 12 December 2007 (UTC)

Dam! You have added more stuff!

I'm going to have to find a nice picture to do with all that now! MrN 15:22, Dec 12

I hope you actually LIKE it!   Le Cejak • <-> (Dec 12 / 15:23)

I might MrN it a little... But It's basically good stuff... Concept is the most difficult of the categories to described for sure...

And I can tell you really don't like my Shakespeare pic! Ya keeps a removing it! I tried to find a picture of Shakespeare taking a crap, but hea, that's not an easy task, and that was the best I could do... MrN 15:28, Dec 12

I'm looking for a picture right now... glad you like it!   Le Cejak • <-> (Dec 12 / 15:29)

I think it can be made a bit more concise, but it's basically good. I will let you finish messing (adding pictures) (we might need at least two more I think ) with the guide, then see if I can make what you have written a bit more concise... I'm not taking you EDIT CONFLICT BASTARD! on again, that's too much like hard work...

People might start to wine even more that it's getting too big though, so be careful about adding too much new. This is good though. MrN 15:40, Dec 12

Who's wining? Somebody associated with pee review? Otherwise, I don't care that much.   Le Cejak • <-> (Dec 12 / 15:43)

I'm glad that you're going to edit it, because it needs editing for length. However, we basically need those sections, I think.   Le Cejak • <-> (Dec 12 / 15:44)

What do you think of the added pics?   Le Cejak • <-> (Dec 12 / 16:13)

Just a tip if you would?

How do you stop a page having a menu? I can't find how to do it... MrN 16:00, Dec 12

What do you mean by "menu"?   Le Cejak • <-> (Dec 12 / 16:01)

Balls. Contents I meant, sorry. MrN 16:02, Dec 12

__NOTOC__ :D   Le Cejak • <-> (Dec 12 / 16:03)

Just a tip if you would?

How do you stop Uncyclopedia from having a Cajek? I can't find how to do it....~ 16:15, 12 December 2007 (UTC)

You MEGABAN IT for ever and ever without giving a sufficient reason. Then you write an article making fun of it. While it's gone, talk about it behind it's back.   Le Cejak • <-> (Dec 12 / 16:17)

And here I was thinking it's just as simple as: __NOCAJEK__ ~ 16:24, 12 December 2007 (UTC)

I tried it. Doesn't work.   Le Cejak • <-> (Dec 12 / 16:27)

Dam, why does it not work when I click on MEGABAN IT... Maybe you should make me an admin Mordillo? MrN 16:31, Dec 12

There are a few people on my banlist, too, Mordillo!   Le Cejak • <-> (Dec 12 / 16:39)