From Uncyclopedia, the content-free encyclopedia
Jump to navigation
Jump to search
Score: +5
|
Good |
- Good If it comes even remotely close to ripping-off Suddenly, Raccoons properly, I shall be able to rest in peace. --Scofield 12:06, February 16, 2011 (UTC)
- Then rest in peace you shall! I kept seeing this as it was created, and can't get the sight out of my eyes. AGH, MY EYES! Aleister 12:10 16-2-'11
- Good It plays well. The comment on the froggy delete line could be slightly more acidic. mAttlobster. (hello) 11:32, February 19, 2011 (UTC)
- Dildo I agree with whatever the majority says. Baa. Baa. I think that you could probably use a little more wit on the deletion reasons though. Also would like to see an admin hack up the article and then huff it again, based upon the premise that it was so bad it should have been deleted twice. Pup 11:58 19 Feb '11
- Good. —Sir Socky (talk) (stalk) GUN SotM UotM PMotM UotY PotM WotM 09:45, 22 February 2011
|
Not Good |
|
Comments |
- I actually took that comment out of what he'd actually said while huffing an article. I have my sources, you know... --Scofield 11:34, February 19, 2011 (UTC)
- I thought my new entry to VFG would have successfully revived it. Alas, the fifth vote that shall get this into the list is yet to come! ;-( --Scofield 09:40, February 22, 2011 (UTC)
- Promoted! Yay! --Scofield 06:59, February 23, 2011 (UTC)
|
Score: +5
|
Good |
- Good?
- There's no way in hell this is making VFH, thought I'd try my luck here. Che } 05:34,30May,2010
- I lol'd once, so that makes it a good, unfeaturable article. Nominally Humane! some time Tuesday, 02:35, Jun 1 2010 UTC
- Good When I did the extensive in-depth pee review, I helped it along to its present unfeaturable form. Makes me proud to see it do well here. Al des chains 2:46 1 6 MMX
- Sure It actually makes good use of the
fucking gayass strikethrough, which is good. —Pelozurian (talk) 08:08, 5 June 2010 (UTC)
- This is brilliant! --Scofield 11:18, February 19, 2011 (UTC)
|
Not Good |
|
Comments |
- Promoted --Scofield 11:20, February 19, 2011 (UTC)
|
Score: +5
|
Good |
- Good I was expecting a poorly written fanboy mess, but i'm surprised at how much I laughed at it. Too cliched to be VFH worthy, but definitely funny. Saberwolf116 22:35, June 24, 2010 (UTC)
- Good This was a delicious article. --Deliciously Whipped~(Kremé) 20:08, September 8, 2010 (UTC)
- Really quite good, especially the part about the "Knights of Negro" also having an unspeakable word. pillow talk 22:25, September 8, 2010 (UTC)
- good per above. --Mn-z 00:55, September 9, 2010 (UTC)
- Good A few touch-ups and everybody'll love....let's not say that word. --Scofield 11:00, February 6, 2011 (UTC)
|
Not Good |
|
Comments |
- promoted --Scofield 11:10, February 6, 2011 (UTC)
|
Score: +5
|
Good |
|
Not Good |
|
Comments |
- This article has only three categories, and needs at least 49 more. Having three categories is negative-spam. Al de'chain 3:14 19 3 mmx
|