From Uncyclopedia, the content-free encyclopedia
Jump to navigation
Jump to search
| Article: UnPoetia:Your "Eau aip Ods"
|
Score: -1
|
| Nominated by:
|
~~ Sir Ljlego, GUN [talk] 21:37, 23 April 2008 (UTC)
|
For: 3
|
- SNF Rather like UnBooks:Fischer Price, this was meant to be an allusion to Uncyclopedia's other favorite disaster, but mostly to mock the ever-so-serious poetry which pervades literature classes.~~ Sir Ljlego, GUN [talk] 21:37, 23 April 2008 (UTC)
- F♥r. Absolutely. While I usually contend that articles based on in-jokes shouldn't be featured, I just found this to be a fantastic exception. ~Minitrue Sir SysRq! Talk! Sex! =/ GUN • WotM • RotM • AotM • VFH • SK • PEEING • HP • BFF @ 22:43 Apr 23
- I stand by my previous for vote, and all future for votes as well. - P.M., WotM, & GUN, Sir Led Balloon
 (Tick Tock) (Contribs) 04:32, Apr 24
|
Against: 4
|
- Against. Sorry Lj, I have to stand by my previous vote as well. Cleverly written (as usual) and so forth, but it just doesn't hit any of my funny buttons. --SirU.U.Esq. VFH | GUN | Natter | Uh oh | Pee 09:13, Apr 24
- Against We really need a new controversy; this one is far past it's prime. --Cap'n Sir Ben GUN WotM VFH VFP 01:36, 25 April 2008 (UTC)
- No laugh Just didn't make me laugh --Sir DJ ~ Irreverent
     07:08, 25 April 2008 (UTC)
- No woman, no cry. Really a "context" article and without it just doesn't do anything. Against. -- Sir Mhaille
 (talk to me)
|
| Comments
|
- @ Ben: I don't think this was about controversy. This was, in my opinion, just a great article and I think voting should be as such. In fact, this could be the best time to feature this now that no one really cares about Euroipods anymore and there is no more controversy. ~Minitrue Sir SysRq! Talk! Sex! =/ GUN • WotM • RotM • AotM • VFH • SK • PEEING • HP • BFF @ 01:52 Apr 25
- Oh, dash it all! Most of you people don't seem to be getting the point. Maybe I listen to too much prog rock and therefore am pretentious, but this doesn't need Euroipods to understand it! Yes, I make a point to include enough references to it in the poem as an easter egg. See the talk page if you want to find them and don't see them. Like I said in my nomination reason, this is like UnBooks:Fischer Price. That one took the name of a much more controversial controversy. Look at this as something of a retrospective if you can't see past it in any other way. However, I make it a point to say again that this is a poem mocking love poems. It's supposed to show darkness in the human stalker spirit. It's supposed to mock the conventions of poets to fit the correct amount of syllables on a line, and yet not care at some other junctures. Were I to change the name, not only would it probably receive half of the against votes that it received, but it wouldn't change the underlying "point" of it. If it didn't make you laugh, then fine. That's perfectly fine. But I urge you to try to see past the title and recognize its merits, rather than looking at me as an attention whore doing this to shake things up.~~ Sir Ljlego, GUN [talk] 21:50, 25 April 2008 (UTC)
- Yes. And as I said last time, which I stood by this time, I get it. I understand the point and the subtexty bit, I think it's clever and well written, but it doesn't make me laugh. Still, I'm sure that, you being you, you'll be back here before long with something else that does. Such is life, my friend! --SirU.U.Esq. VFH | GUN | Natter | Uh oh | Pee 08:56, Apr 26
- Should have realised it was one of yours, LJ. Funnily enough I actually liked it more as a piece of poetry than an Uncyclopedia article. It is very good, just not very funny, hence my vote. -- Sir Mhaille (talk to me)
|
VFH
← Back to summary VFH
← Back to full VFH
