| Article: Sickipedia
|
Score: -3 sick uncyclopedians
|
| Nominated by:
|
Mimo&maxus 09:41, May 27, 2011 (UTC)
|
For: 2
|
 For&nom(lol)It's very nice. That's it. Find your own reason. --Mimo&maxus 09:41, May 27, 2011 (UTC)- For. —Sir Socky
   (talk) (stalk)  GUN SotM UotM PMotM UotY PotM WotM 14:49, 27 May 2011
|
Against: 5
|
 Against. Before checking out the site (I didn't know it before), I thought "this isn't remotely funny, what is this about?". After checking out the site, this article looks more like a possible snapshot rather than a parody, with the only difference that on the original site I understood most of the jokes and found a handful of them a bit funny (=for half a second), while here, I understood a handful of them and found none of them funny. Or is this the parody concept? That the jokes all suck? Well, I'm afraid that's not enough for a feature. Schamschi, 12:19, May 27, 2011 (UTC)- Against. An in joke about another site?
 RomArtus*Imperator ® (Orate) 13:00, May 27, 2011 (UTC)
- Against. "Why couldn't Helen Keller drive? So I raped her?" I seriously think stuff like this should be removed from Uncyc articles unless it serves a purpose. I don't even know about Sickipedia, but whatever it is, a feature on Uncyc cannot just talk about it unless it's a parody of or..uh..atleast funny. Sorry.
  -> That's Poop Man Poop 14:55, May 27, 2011 (UTC)
- Against Per PoopManPoop.
 Mattsnow 14:57, May 27, 2011 (UTC)
- Against Its concept isn't very good, so everything suffers because of it. It's hard to parody a site that deals in jokes, because then your parody has to be comprised of not-jokes that still have to be funny. But anti-humor is only funny in very small doses.~~ Sir Ljlego, GUN [talk] 16:23, May 27, 2011 (UTC)
|
VFH
← Back to summary VFH
← Back to full VFH
For&nom(lol)It's very nice. That's it. Find your own reason. --
Against. Before checking out the site (I didn't know it before), I thought "this isn't remotely funny, what is this about?". After checking out the site, this article looks more like a possible snapshot rather than a parody, with the only difference that on the original site I understood most of the jokes and found a handful of them a bit funny (=for half a second), while here, I understood a handful of them and found none of them funny. Or is this the parody concept? That the jokes all suck? Well, I'm afraid that's not enough for a feature. 
