| Article: Life of Pi
|
Score: -0.5
|
| Nominated by:
|
   22:08, 1 February 2009 (UTC)
|
For: 3.5
|
- Nom&For I haven't read the actual novel but I find this strangely funny anyway-- 22:08, 1 February 2009 (UTC)
- For. I think it's good enough. -Sockpuppet of an unregistered user 11:00, 2 February 2009 (UTC)
- for. i thought it was rather good. SirGerrycheeversGunTalk 22:25, 3 February 2009 (UTC)
- For. 82.21.76.246 16:25, 4 February 2009 (UTC)
|
Against: 4
|
- Against. The grammar really needs to be fixed first.
 Unsolicited conversation Extravagant beauty PEEING 01:19, 2 February 2009 (UTC)
- Ehhh... • • • Necropaxx (T) {~} 17:44, Feb 2
- Against *shrugs* --Guildensternenstein 05:45, 9 February 2009 (UTC)
- Very against. Having read this book myself, (happens to be one of my favorite books) I found this to be disappointing. There is so much room for parody, and this just seems way too passive to me. It's not structured enough. It's not well written. There's no angle. This needs a lot of work before it's featurable. —Sir SysRq (talk) 15:23, 9 February 2009 (UTC)
|
| Comments
|
By Apollo1758 A relatively new writer who's been quietly industrious-- 22:08, 1 February 2009 (UTC)
- Grammar fixed. Sorry about that, I spent a considerable amount of time yesterday searching for VFH material and I must have been in speed-read mode - not noticing a few obvious things.-- 11:10, 2 February 2009 (UTC)
- Abstain I don't get it, but I have the feeling that something is there to get. --S'r Mnbvcxz 05:55, 5 February 2009 (UTC)
|
VFH
← Back to summary VFH
← Back to full VFH
