| Comments
|
I changed my 1/4 for to a 1/2 for, its a high quality article. However, there are certaintly improvements, and I kinda wish we had a different process to nominate featured articles. Gale5050 complain about me! 20:40, 4 January 2021 (UTC)
 Comment. I'll offer 3/4 support if an admin promises not to fully protect it should it be successful....but it won't get a full vote until there is some severe improvement.Good luck! Gale5050 complain about me! 00:16, 5 January 2021 (UTC)
- Gale the articles are protected while the article is actually featured. That protection comes down once the article is not featured on the main page. Please don't make your votes contingent on administrators actions but on how much you enjoy the article. Also, please try to be specific with your constructive criticism. It needs "severe improvement" doesn't really tell me anything. Note your actual criticism on the talk page of the article (and please try to be specific. When you do this the author can decide if they want to change their creation based on it. ShabiDOO 00:25, 5 January 2021 (UTC)
- Well, for one, it is a bit too redundant. The problem is though, is that if its protected we can't improve it. Gale5050 complain about me! 01:05, 5 January 2021 (UTC)
- There has been some improvement. Gale5050 complain about me! 18:24, 5 January 2021 (UTC)
- Gale this level of holding back your vote by fractions until it satisfies every one of your demands is border-line rude. If you have specific suggestions then please write them on the talk page of the article. I'm not going to keep editing this article until it meets your absolute final satisfaction like a school boy begging for an A+ from their teacher. However I would certainly appreciate clear, specific and constructive criticism which you can leave on the article's talk page any time. ShabiDOO 03:24, 8 January 2021 (UTC)
- The prose/formatting could use a little work, and the humor is not easy to understand. Remember, we are presenting to people who are most likely unfamiliar with this type of humor, not people who can easily understand it. —-Gale5050 complain about me! And see my Wikipedia contributions! 13:34, 8 January 2021 (UTC)
- I've also reduced to a 3/4 vote, per Shabidoo's comment above. Gale5050 complain about me! And see my Wikipedia contributions! 00:09, 9 January 2021 (UTC)
- Gale that is the nastiest voting game I've ever seen in the history of this site. You can withdraw your entire vote for all I care. Please be civil to other users and show good faith. ShabiDOO 01:18, 9 January 2021 (UTC)
- For one, the image here, in my opinion, makes it slightly less funny, and should be removed. The humour is not easy to understand for someone not involved with Uncyclopedia. Gale5050 complain about me! And see my Wikipedia contributions! 14:00, 9 January 2021 (UTC)
- I'm sorry, but since my concerns were ignored, I had to remove my 3/4 support. I am now abstaining until my concerns are met. Gale5050 complain about me! And see my Wikipedia contributions! 01:14, 11 January 2021 (UTC)
- Gale it is super fucking obnoxious to withdraw support because someone didn't make changes you wanted (or any changes at all). Stop it please. I don't want your vote AT ALL if you are going to act like this. ShabiDOO 08:14, 11 January 2021 (UTC)
- It’s not obnoxious. It’s called rushing through an article and mining it when it’s shy of my standards. I’ll admit it; I have extremely high standards for VFH. Not meeting those standards, can, in fact, be not meeting a simple concern. This article, I am afraid, in shy of my VFH standards. The image makes it slightly less funny in two ways: by depriving him our image and depriving normal humor, as our eyes catch on to an image first. That’s why I am trying to start a forum on this. I will stay off this VFH page. Gale5050 complain about me! And see my Wikipedia contributions! 12:52, 11 January 2021 (UTC)
- I would appreciate it Gale if you would listen to what other users here are trying to tell you and not react defensively but learn from other people. It is the only way you will be able to function on this site. Please try to do that. ShabiDOO 19:18, 11 January 2021 (UTC)
- Ok. However, I voiced a concern on that image(it's the one with 3 oranges, one is grey, for further clarification). That wasn't removed. It makes it slightly less funny. Tbh, that paragraph makes the whole thing less VFHworthy.Not every article goes to VFH, and IMHO, this still needs work. Gale5050 complain about me! And see my Wikipedia contributions! 20:21, 11 January 2021 (UTC)
- Take it to the talk page of the article Gale. This is a voting page, not an extended critique page or a place to make demands. Please don't edit this page again. ShabiDOO 22:30, 11 January 2021 (UTC)
|
For. God is not amused, but I am! 
Comment. I'll offer 3/4 support if an admin promises not to fully protect it should it be successful....but it won't get a full vote until there is some severe improvement.Good luck! 