From Uncyclopedia, the content-free encyclopedia
Jump to navigation
Jump to search
| Article: Formula Floor
|
Score: -1 tantrums over who gets to be Lewis Hamilton
|
| Nominated by:
|
Hindleyite Converse • ?pedia 13:22, 17 November 2008 (UTC)
|
For: 2
|
- This is the typical excellent Uncyclopedian article - to me, it's what the wiki's all about. It has been voted down before, at the end of last year but had a score of +7. Vote for it now, lest it be eaten by the dog or get lost at the back of the toybox. -- Hindleyite Converse • ?pedia 13:22, 17 November 2008 (UTC)
- Voted for this last time. • • • Necropaxx (T) {~} 16:29, Nov 17
|
Against: 3
|
- Against. Largely for the reasons in Nachlader's abstain: it needs a little more work - needs at least one more pic, and it looks like the author intended to add stuff to the history section then forgot it. The concept is good, and there's good stuff there - I would like to see it featured, but would also like it to be in a better state than this when it is. --UU - natter
 15:04, Nov 17
- Weak Against per above, it looks like its a work in progress.--Mnbvcxz 22:24, 17 November 2008 (UTC)
- Against. It just doesn't look like it's worthy of a feature. I would suggest sending this to Pee Review to get a better grip of what needs to be updated, Sir Starnestommy
 (Talk • Contribs • CUN) 02:32, Nov. 19, 2008
|
| Comments
|
Abstain. I like it, but I think the child's perspective (or at least I saw it) writing style should be improved. An expansion wouldn't hurt too, such as the "History" section, of which consists of "- Improve -". I want to vote for it, as I know it can be better, but after a few tweaks. If it gets featured in this state, then that's cool (hence why I'm not voting against it). --Nachlader 14:54, 17 November 2008 (UTC)
- It's got a great base but is clearly a work in progress, some sentences stop mid way in parts. First I'll speak to Moneke and then I'll have a stab at improving it. --Sir DJ ~ Irreverent
     11:57, 18 November 2008 (UTC)
- Comment. A few typos and such, and of course history section missing - I like it otherwise. Style
 Guide 06:47, 19 November 2008 (UTC)
|
VFH
← Back to summary VFH
← Back to full VFH
