| Article: 01000010 01101001 01101110 01100001 01110010 01111001
|
Score: -3 01110110 01101111 01110100 01100101 01110011
|
| Nominated by:
|
Teh Rote 23:29, 10 April 2008 (UTC)
|
For: 3
|
- Nom & for. I find it rather hypocritical that AAAAAAAAA! was featured but not one. It's brilliant! Come on, who's with me? Teh Rote 23:29, 10 April 2008 (UTC)
- For 000011100 10001110 100010111 --Knucmo2 00:55, 11 April 2008 (UTC)
- For. Parsat, or, A Whole Bunch of Mischief 01:07, 11 April 2008 (UTC)
|
Against: 6
|
- Eh The Morse code article is way better. This just looks like random nonsense --Sir DJ ~ Irreverent
     01:47, 11 April 2008 (UTC)
- Against. Anything that takes that much effort to understand isn't worth it. and most of it's not funny when you do know what it says. And AAA is funnier when you don't. And... Just no. --SirU.U.Esq. VFH | GUN | Natter | Uh oh | Pee 12:45, Apr 11
- No. ~ QUILz ( talk | contrib ) 12:45, 11 April 2008 (UTC)
- Psh please, binary conversion lolz are so 5 years ago.. --THINKER 15:48, 11 April 2008 (UTC)
 Against. and i would have been against featuring AAAAAAAAA! as well Robertodole 21:31, 11 April 2008 (UTC)- Against. AAAAAAAAA! was featured for the concept. This is the same damn concept with nothing new to it, thus: Not a chance. ~ {{{1}}} Skull OMG VOGHT FOR MY ARTIKLES OR NOM SUM CUZ IM A WHORE LOL
|
VFH
← Back to summary VFH
← Back to full VFH
Against. and i would have been against featuring 