Forum:We should have UnCycloLeaks

Forums: Index > Village Dump > We should have UnCycloLeaks

Note: This topic has been unedited for 4837 days. It is considered archived - the discussion is over. Do not add to unless it really needs a response.

How about we have a website that is a parody of WikiLeaks? Parody any confidential information? It would be good. |Si Plebius Dato' Joe ang Aussie CUN|IC Kill | 06:02, July 24, 2010 (UTC)

We already have a NSFW category. Let's just rename it.--<<>> 11:59, July 24, 2010 (UTC)

But Wikileaks isn't actually a sub-website of Wikipedia, its a stand-alone wiki. If we're gonna parody them, why not parody every wiki on the internet? ^{Pirate Lord}__Sonic80 (Yell  •  Latest literary excretion) __ 16:15, July 24, 2010 (UTC)

Well, I see no problem with parodying WikiLeaks. We haven't been a parody of just Wikipedia for a long time. MegaPleb • Dexter111344 • Complain here 16:20, July 24, 2010 (UTC)

To be fair, we were never a good parody. Sir Modusoperandi ^Boinc! 20:27, July 24, 2010 (UTC)

WikiLeaks may be a stand-alone wiki, but we can have a section called "UncycloLeaks". |Si Plebius Dato' Joe ang Aussie CUN|IC Kill | 09:31, July 25, 2010 (UTC)

DOO IT YORUSFLE. Aside namespaces. Use the NOLOGO template as a plot device, wink wink. --Sir General Minister G5 FIYC UPotM [Y] #21 F@H KUN 15:25, July 25, 2010 (UTC)

Why not simply UnLeaks? NaturalBornKieler (talk) 14:13, July 28, 2010 (UTC)

UnNews:UnWikiLeaks and the media was written in this vein, and I was thinking of incorporating the whole WikiLeaks thing into the UnNews columns section. Rev. Zim_ulator (Talk) I am the dirt under your rollers 00:45, July 29, 2010 (UTC)

If I do it myself, then the result will look shit. That's why I'm thinking of a collaboration. |Si Plebius Dato' Joe ang Aussie CUN|IC Kill | 07:44, July 29, 2010 (UTC)