Forum:I LIKE PIE is dead
The great and wonderful I LIKE PIE!!! has been smitten by Roman Dog Bird, so I think we should have some kind of funeral for his infinite ban, and a article based on him because he was so awesome. I'm going to miss that kid. Sniff :(
P.S. I sure do love sarcasm--DirectorWILLYOU 333 03:39, February 8, 2010 (UTC)
“ | I WILL NOT GET BANNED AGAIN "clapping hands"!!!--I LIKE PIE!!! 21:21, February 7, 2010 (UTC) | ” |
“ | Who? --Roman Dog Bird 03:45, February 8, 2010 (UTC) | ” |
I fully support having him mentioned on the Worst 100 Reflections on 2010. Someone write an entry for him. -- Roman Dog Bird 03:46, February 8, 2010 (UTC)
He put one of his last missives on my talk page, and when I turned around he was gone. So sudden. 4 and 20 blackbirds. Aleister in Chains 3:48 8 Feb. MMX
- Alas poor ILP-- I knew him well. This brings sorrow to my heart for he was BRILLIANT! ...for a ten-year-old... He picked Legos over Nerf, and Politics over Sitcoms! *sniff* I thnik I may have gottens some sick. Or dust in my eyes... Meh. ~ Avast Matey!!! Happytimes are here!* ~ ~ 08 Feb 2010 ~ 04:37 (UTC)
- I LIKE PIE!!! is gone, now like my innocence. --Pleb SYNDROME CUN medicate (butt poop!!!!) 08:11, February 9, 2010 (UTC)
- Alas poor ILP-- I knew him well. This brings sorrow to my heart for he was BRILLIANT! ...for a ten-year-old... He picked Legos over Nerf, and Politics over Sitcoms! *sniff* I thnik I may have gottens some sick. Or dust in my eyes... Meh. ~ Avast Matey!!! Happytimes are here!* ~ ~ 08 Feb 2010 ~ 04:37 (UTC)
You guys...
I LIKE PIE!!! —Paizuri MUN ♦ Talkpage ♦ My Contributions ♦ 10:09, 9 February 2010 (UTC)
- How did I not know this guy? He's like me when I was 10. And 12. And 15. And 17. += 23:09,9February,2010
VFH
Uncyclopedia:VFH/User talk:I LIKE PIE!!!
Figured this would be a nice tribute to him. += 23:15,9February,2010
Poop throwing monkeys
And here's a tribute page, an article which Zana Happytimes suggested that he start and write. If he's not here to do it, we must carry on in his memory. Aleister in Chains 00:31 10 Feb. MMX
Who?
-OptyC Sucks! CUN00:37, 10 Feb
- Uhhhhhhhh.....I don't know, uh huh huh huh huh --Butt-head 20:12, February 10, 2010 (UTC)
About his new ban...
I think I'll tackle everything:
- "Well, he can use the e-mail user function"
- Do you really think he'll figure it out? Or be able to write a huge case in e-mail, for that matter? He's 10. It just won't happen.
- "If he can't use the e-mail user function even, then how valuable is he to the site?"
- A valid point for sure, but he was asking to be adopted, and he even had "Articles I Created" in his space. He was trying to be a good member, and caused no trouble on that account. Had he been allowed to stay, he probably would have created an article (Admittedly a bad one) and it would've been deleted and his adopter would have helped him, and a good article would probably result. Maybe then he would have been a productive member.
- "All sockpuppets banned users are banned!"
- Oh, really? What about The Crack Vandal? [| You even held a trial for NXWave] (Even though he lost) after he created five. And how do I know all of this? This is what happens when you have no life.
- "Your username is not I LIKE PIE!!! so stay out of it"
- Another valid point, I just don't like seeing people banned when they could be good users.
- In the end, I know the site isn't a democracy, but I just think his case should be heard.
- I think I'll tackle everything by saying:
- "The ban message shows very clearly how to use it."
- I'll be happy to ban you to show you exactly how it looks like.
- "He's only ten years old".
- Granted, and as soon as a certain staff member find that out, he'll be banned anyway. Minimal age is 13.
- Also, surprise! This is not a members club or a social media website. If the only thing you can contribute is annoying everyone, then you don't belong here and you can do very well as a reader. Placing "YO MAN!" all over talk pages and continuing with the exact hassle you got banned for, is not showing promise.
- "NXWave blah blah blah."
- You are referring to a case that I will, politely note, don't have the context or the background to use. Catch me one day when I'm in the right mood and I might give you the whole story. Also - an admin blocks him indefinitely. He comes back a couple of days under a new username and starts harassing people all over again? Sure! Let's just welcome him with opened arms! Indefinite obviously means just a couple of days.
- "Your username isn't I LIKE PIE!
- Correct, stay out of this. The admins here have been dealing with idiot, vandals and an endless array of useless trolls for a long time, we don't need lawyers helping "the innocent" and "the weak". Non of the currently active admins are banning for the heck of it or because it makes us feel big and important. We do that to limit disruptions to writing good solid humor. He annoyed people, he was warned, he ignored, he's gone. Case closed.
- "This is yet another dramatic shit mountain that grew way beyond proportions and everyone already forgot what the original issue was all about".
- Correct. ~ 21:54, February 10, 2010 (UTC)
- I know the ban was for a reason. And I had no idea there was a minimal age, seriously. Sorry for that. :| I just don't think he was harassing. But I'll back down and not be an annoyance about it...
21:14, February 10, 2010 (UTC)
And I've seen the ban message before, I asked to be banned and I did see it...
22:05, February 10, 2010 (UTC)