Forum:Fat Sandy was deletd
why was my article dleated was isnt it good? i thought it was good --Apples 21:15, 10 June 2006 (UTC)
- It was vanity, and it was bad. See HTBFANJS and our Vanity Policies.
t o m p k i n s blah. ﺞوﻦ וףה ՃՄ ண்ஸ ފއހ วอฏม +տ trade websites 21:18, 10 June 2006 (UTC)
Essentially it was deleted as it wasn't encyclopedic enough, and seemed to be made up of random comments about a non-notable individual. The content was:-
"Did you every see a 6 years old 100 pound well thats my cousen Sandy she is 100 pouds I only weigh 93.0 pouns she weigh more then you thinck. About it 100 pouns for a six years old I have this frend and she is 3 years old she ran into Sandy and fell! SHe is FFFFFFFFFFFFFFFFFAAAAAAAAAAAAAAATTTTTTTTTTTTTTTTTTTT."
Quality Control basically shot it for its own good. -- Sir Mhaille 
(talk to me)
then whats good to you i thought it was funny its about my evil cousen sandy and shes rallly fat hahahahah --Apples 21:21, 10 June 2006 (UTC)
- You said it yourself. It is about your cousin Sandy who none of us know. Encyclopedias only contain notable people. --Uncyclon - Do we still link to BENSON? 00:23, 11 June 2006 (UTC)
- Wait another 10 years or so, apples. Study hard and become a lawyer. 'evil cousen sandy' will probably be struggling to find work as a road sweeper at that stage, so that's a good time for revenge. Then you can look back on this little incident with all the light of experience and wonder - WTF was I thinking? In the mean time, keep contributing. --Sir Hardwick Fundlebuggy (Bleat) 03:49, 11 June 2006 (UTC)
Being from New Jersey myself, I think perhaps I should take it upon myself to interpret what Apples is trying to illustrate. Ninety percent of current New Jerseyans have fled from Philadelphia, one of America's fattest cities, in an effort to escape the shame of a losing football team. When they reach New Jersey they realize that, because of excessive corruption emanating from Trenton, New Jersey has no football team of its own and thus they have moved for nothing, causing them to eat more. Pretty soon they're all filled up on cheesesteaks, Tastycakes and scrapple and they somehow manage to reproduce, spawning some of the fattest babies in the world. Apples' "cousen" Sandy is one of these critters and Apples, to further illustrate this point, overlaps the words "think" and "thick" in a juxtaposition that would make Joyce proud. Through his unique poetic vision (rockin' the blank verse style, of course) Apples is seeking to comment on the brain-damaging fumes that New Jersey is infamous for, a fact that the state's EPA chooses to deny to this day. His three year old "frend" obviously represents the future of America, illiterate and destined to run headfirst into a wall of fat. Finally, there are seventeen F's, fifteen A's and twenty T's. Clearly these are the winning numbers for New Jersey's Lottery tomorrow evening, where F is six, A is one and T is twenty, making the winning numbers: 1,6,15,17,20,20. But since there are twenty T's and T represents twenty, we know that these are the numbers for the Cash 5, and not the Pick 6: 1,6,15,17,20. In this way Apples is confessing to a heightened perception and possibly clairvoyance, placing even greater importance on this message. And making us all rich. Thank you, Apples! --Immy I will never wash my talk page again 08:17, 12 June 2006 (UTC)
- Well Apples, ya got one out of five right. Thanks a lot. That dollar was gonna go toward charm school. Oh well, there'll be more windshields for me to scrub with my newspaper tomorrow. --Immy I will never wash my talk page again 04:17, 13 June 2006 (UTC)
NOTE TO ALL N00BS:
NOBODY CARES ABOUT YOUR STUPID, DELETED PAGES! SHUT THE HELL UP AND WRITE BETTER!
Any questions? ~
CaputosistheHorrible16:12, 16 June 2006 (UTC)
- A side note: My first article was NRV'd. Everyone's first articles suck. That's part of the game. If your article is deleted, NRV'd, stubbed, VFD'd, or whatever, it means try harder. ~ Simulacrum Caputosis 16:12, 16 June 2006 (UTC)
- Mine did, not. --
15:54, 17 June 2006 (UTC)
- Yeah!. at last you hit it right off with that account... Finally ( WARFARE!!!!!!!!!!! ) . -- Vosnul 22:23, 17 June 2006 (UTC)
- Shutup, stm. We all know you're better than us. You don't have to rub it in... ;)--<<
>> 03:37, 18 June 2006 (UTC)
- Well I did have the sense to rewrite it. In fact, it still exists. That's because 1: it wasn't vanity, and 2: I completely rewrote it after it was tagged. That's why the tag is there. ~ Simulacrum Caputosis 16:19, 19 June 2006 (UTC)
- OK, so where is the article? -- Colonel Swordman 18:28, 19 June 2006 (UTC)
- OK, so where is the article? -- Colonel Swordman 18:28, 19 June 2006 (UTC)
- Well I did have the sense to rewrite it. In fact, it still exists. That's because 1: it wasn't vanity, and 2: I completely rewrote it after it was tagged. That's why the tag is there. ~ Simulacrum Caputosis 16:19, 19 June 2006 (UTC)
- uncyclopedia is pretty darn good at rooting out so-called "contributions" by people convicted of felonious aggravated douchebaggery...tard. Cigaro Cubano 15:00, 20 June 2006 (UTC)
- Mine did, not. --
- A side note: My first article was NRV'd. Everyone's first articles suck. That's part of the game. If your article is deleted, NRV'd, stubbed, VFD'd, or whatever, it means try harder. ~ Simulacrum Caputosis 16:12, 16 June 2006 (UTC)
you guys will think its very funy if you look at my paige and you will laff and go hahahahaah and then i can put it back --Apples 01:28, 8 July 2006 (UTC)
- *Hahahahaha* Yes, I am laughing at you. -- Colonel Swordman 16:26, 8 July 2006 (UTC)
- Strong Against. Why? Move it to the Ministry of Love, it qualifies doesn't it?--Wit (tawk) 04:09, 8 July 2006 (UTC)
- Fanatically against. That one deserves a quickie. -- Colonel Swordman 16:26, 8 July 2006 (UTC)
It's clear your article sucks on a scale not yet seen in Uncyclopedia, nonetheless, you COULD write an article about a notable fat person, like Oprah. Oh, I'm sorry - she's already been done. Dudewheresmypizz4 04:54, 8 July 2006 (UTC)