Forum:Anyone with me?

From Uncyclopedia, the content-free encyclopedia
Jump to navigation Jump to search
Forums: Index > Village Dump > Anyone with me?
Note: This topic has been unedited for 6255 days. It is considered archived - the discussion is over. Do not add to unless it really needs a response.

I created Game:Gueslayer one day, and would like help building it. Emmzee is already helping.

You can also find it at the end of The Abyss, now easier to beat! (if you can't beat the game, try this) Anyone with me? We need a new template, and original Uncyclopedia content.

And YOU. – Preceding unsigned comment added by Trar (talk • contribs)

I'm feeling a little singled out right now. --Anyone 15:27, 31 January 2007 (UTC)

You're not the only one. When I watch a crime drama they're always talking about the criminal's me.--Sir Modusoperandi Boinc! 17:42, 31 January 2007 (UTC)
Look, can everyone stop mentioning my name? --Me
Look, can everyone stop mentioning my name? --The Criminal
For godsakes, what?! --Look
Hey, don't involve me. --God
Oh, shit. Proof of God's existence...there goes my atheism. Can you sign my Bible. I got it from a hotel room...and while I've got you on the line, WTF? Seriously, WTF?--Sir Modusoperandi Boinc! 21:03, 31 January 2007 (UTC)
Shouldn't he vanish in a puff of logic now? --Missingno... 23:57, 31 January 2007 (UTC)

Game:Abyss 2 also claims to be the sequel. They can't both be the sequel, so which is? --Sir OCdt Jedravent CUN UmP VFH PLS ACS WH 19:39, 31 January 2007 (UTC)

Grueslayer is not the sequel, it's a spinoff. A sub-game. --Trar 21:47, 31 January 2007 (UTC)

Too many Zork-styled games around here

Original Trilogy

Fan Fiction

Spinoffs

Horribly Inferior Competition

Best Game of 2006

--L 06:16, 1 February 2007 (UTC)


You missed one, i added it to the horribly inferior competition section for you - jack mort | cunt | talkKodamaIcon.jpg - 20:10, 1 February 2007 (UTC)
Zork 1 and 3 belong in the 'Horribly Inferior Competition' category. And Game Online isn't really competition, as it's a completely different concept from Zork-style games. From what I can see, it looks like there's not supposed to be an ending or any set path through the game. Like an infinite branching thingy. --Missingno... 18:50, 3 February 2007 (UTC)
Except it doesn't branch infinitely, because wiki-entropy sets in and nobody wants to contribute anymore once the incoherence level becomes so great that even edit-happy newbies and IPs no longer desire to add their smelly little storylines into the game because the branches of funny are infinitely regressing, which means you have to go back towards the beginning of the game's storyline to plug into a new vein of humor, and then the process starts all over again, and this sentence is very long and has too many subordinate clauses. --Thinking cap small.png»The Acceptable Cainad (Fnord) 19:03, 3 February 2007 (UTC)
Game Online kicks ass. Don't mess with the greatness that is Game Online! --Crazyswordsman...With SAVINGS!!!! (T/C) 20:28, 3 February 2007 (UTC)
It's still not Zork competition. --Missingno... 18:26, 4 February 2007 (UTC)