From Uncyclopedia, the content-free encyclopedia
Jump to navigation
Jump to search
| Article: Russian reversal (phenomenon)
|
Score: 17 embarrassingly reversed Russians
|
| Nominated by:
|
nom P.M., WotM, & GUN, Sir Led Balloon  (Tick Tock) (Contribs) 22:20, 10 August 2007 (UTC)
|
For: 20
|
- N+F Ljlego showed this to me on the IRC. Needless to say, I was quite amused. For P.M., WotM, & GUN, Sir Led Balloon (Tick Tock) (Contribs) 22:20, 10 August 2007 (UTC)
- For Another good one from Ljlego --THE 15:07, 11 August 2007 (UTC)
- For - Roro
  (talk) (Contribs) 15:31, 11 August 2007 (UTC)
- Self For Because I hate the article. Hey, why am I facing this way now?-Sir Ljlego, GUN VFH FIYC WotM SG WHotM PWotM AotM EGAEDM ANotM + (Talk) 20:24, 11 August 2007 (UTC)
- In Soviet Russia, article votes for YOU!! -- Kip the Egg
 Talk Works
- For - In Soviet Russia, page rewrites YOU!! --AAA! (AAAA) 02:30, 12 August 2007 (UTC)
- Mmm k -- Phlegm Leoispotter * (garble! jank!) 15:50, 12 August 2007 (UTC)
- For...but it would benefit from some work, as set out in 'comments' below. RabbiTechno 17:35, 12 August 2007 (UTC)
- For --~
 Jacques Pirat, Esq. Converse : Benefactions : U.w.p. 17:25, 13 August 2007 (UTC)
- For. I would do a gag but it's been done. Twice. SRXT. {{{td}}} 19:36, 14 August 2007 (UTC)
- In Soviet Russia, I'd be voting strongly against! Nevertheless, this is America, so I'm voting weakly for --
 TKFU UUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUCK  19:39, 14 August 2007 (UTC)
- FORE, gets my approval! -
 Admiral Enzo Aquarius-Dial the Gate  01:17, 16 August 2007 (UTC)
- F☭R,
    
- For --Sir Starnestommy
 (Talk • Contribs • CUN • Capt.) 17:58, August 19, 2007
- In Soviet Russia, article votes YOU!! --Jack Phoenix (Contact) 18:11, 19 August 2007 (UTC)
- For --”' PrincessCaitlai ”' (”'T”') 01:11, 20 August 2007 (UTC)
- For. -- Mitch
 01:12, 20 August 2007 (UTC)
- In Soviet Russia, Article votes for YOU!!! EugeneKay wuz here (whine thank) 02:44, 20 August 2007 (UTC)
- The best vote is an uninformed vote. FOR!!! --Roger The Bum Full sig! CLICK HERE!!!!!!!! 03:12, 20 August 2007 (UTC)
- FOR-- That's some good stuff right there. An in-joke brought to feature quality. --Lord Fluffy who rains fire from the heavens 14:48, 20 August 2007 (UTC)
|
Against: 3
|
- Against. While I agree with some of the comments that it needs more work, basically I just didn't find this funny, and I can't put my finger on why. I generally like Ljlego's stuff, so I'm surprised to be voting this way. --Sir Under User (Hi, How Are You?) VFH KUN 08:52, 13 August 2007 (UTC)
- Weak Against. The same as with Under User. I generally like Lj's work, but this was an exception. • • • Necropaxx (T) {~} 19:13, 15 August 2007 (UTC)
- Against I don't find it funny. Just my opinion. Ethereal 14:06, 20 August 2007 (UTC)
|
| Comments
|
DISCUSSION MOVED HERE
- Abs nothing special. And why must everything on Uncyclopedia have unknown origins? Surely we can be somewhat more creative (or could at least have a good joke that works with not knowing the origins of a subject you're supposed to be writing an article about). --THINKER 18:13, 11 August 2007 (UTC)
- I do not feel strongly enough to vote, but I do feel that the prose could use work. For instance, "When the inexplicable 'why?' is, however, not as ably explained by campfire stories, and is still shrouded in mystery as a result" is a sentence that could use some clarity. ----OEJ 17:49, 11 August 2007 (UTC)
- Abstain - I very muchly agree with both OEJ and The Thinker.
 Sir Cs1987 UOTM. t. c 03:29, 12 August 2007 (UTC)
- Abstain I can't understand a word of it. PULL YOUR PROSE TOGETHER LJ! -RAHB 07:59, 12 August 2007 (UTC)
|
VFH
← Back to summary VFH
← Back to full VFH
Always check the feature queue first.
Note: the queue slot won't be properly filled until the {{FA}} code (with correct date) is on the article.Just follow the instructions if you're unsure.
(Tick Tock) (Contribs) 22:20, 10 August 2007 (UTC)
