User talk:TheLedBalloon/Conservapedia

Shall we base this on a spork from the Wikipedia page, or do it from scratch? I think we need to avoid talk like "saps" or anything of a familiar nature in the language. In my view it should be VERY seriously written. If we do this right, we can make our article actually a better and more accurate reference than the Wikipedia page. People will say, "if you want to know the truth about Conservapedia, go to Uncyc, rather than Wikipedia". Now that would be funny. What do you say? SUPER SERIOUS? MrN 04:05, Feb 17

Like I said in the forums, I don't think we should be that serious. I was actually kinda thinking that we make it like a conservapedia article about conservapedia, maybe citing a few bible references and ranting about liberal bias. Still I think the tone should be formal and encyclopedic to a fault, so that it's as mechanical-sounding as conservapedia. - P.M., WotM, & GUN, Sir Led Balloon (Tick Tock) (Contribs) 04:09, Feb 17

Bingo --Sir DJ ~ Irreverent 04:10, 17 February 2008 (UTC)

Fair enough dudes, looks like you guys are going to do most of the work anyways, but I still like the idea of keeping it serious and not using familiar language... If we are doing it in the style of conservapedia, I guess that will keep my "serious" want's in line anyway. I just wanted it to be an accurate reference, which I guess it can be regardless of the writing style. :-) MrN 04:16, Feb 17

I added a bit. I'll add more if anything comes to me. Feel free to revert. Sir Modusoperandi ^Boinc! 17:32, 17 February 2008 (UTC)

Haha, that's great! I'm starting to think that this page could serve as a great satire of not only the website itself, but to extremist conservatives in general. - P.M., WotM, & GUN, Sir Led Balloon (Tick Tock) (Contribs) 17:58, Feb 17

I too did something. I like it. I saw it and saw that it was good.-Sir Ljlego, GUN VFH FIYC WotM SG WHotM PWotM AotM EGAEDM ANotM + (Talk) 04:19, 18 February 2008 (UTC)

Someone made that game already. Ж Kalir, Awesome Author_{(alliteration affords additional awesome)} 16:40, 20 February 2008 (UTC)

Wait, no, that's different. Still good, though. Ж Kalir, Awesome Author_{(alliteration affords additional awesome)} 16:42, 20 February 2008 (UTC)

Into the mainspace?

/me wonders when Led is going to put this into the mainspace. Are you going to overwrite the current mainspace version? In which case is it not better to do this sooner rather than later? Some poor saps are still editing the old version. Maybe they can help with this new version? MrN 00:38, Mar 6

Yes...very soon... perhaps I'll wait to get another image, first, though. I don't really know, yet. - P.M., WotM, & GUN, Sir Led Balloon (Tick Tock) (Contribs) 00:41, Mar 6