User talk:Cajek/Archive18

15 Topics!!!! Now you've gotta make another archive!!!!

NOT ANYMORE IT ISN'T, BIATCH!   Le Cejak • <-> (Dec 22 / 02:33)

HAHAHAHAHHAHHAHAHAHAHHHAHHAHA!!!!!!! --THE 00:42, 21 December 2007 (UTC)

...you little bitch. I'll get you for this... I'LL GET YOU. ...WITH A PITCHFORK, AND A GROUP OF ANGRY VILLAGERS.   Le Cejak • <-> (Dec 21 / 00:45)

Let me just reiterate that this is annoying to the 11th level of annoyingness!!!!1   Le Cejak • <-> (Dec 21 / 00:45)

Sorry. You can give me a totally ridiculous topic to write on when we do the "contest" if you want to punish me. --THE 00:52, 21 December 2007 (UTC)

Hmmm... maybe an article on TOENAIL CLIPPINGS AND HOW EXCITING THEY ARE will change your mind on whatever it is that you were doing earlier... actually, that sounds too funny for you. ...damn! I'm gonna need to think of the perfectly terrible article topic for you! HAHAHA! ...HAHA!   Le Cejak • <-> (Dec 21 / 00:55)

16 Tons of Bananas

milf hunnies

Here is my thought on the concept: Basically the joke was in the title. I was going to originally make the story very bland and boring. But then I thought 'well the perverts here would appreciate a bit of innuendo'..so i threw it in...was really just something to toss off in BHOP....but it got reviewed, dam it. Hmm..Unbooks would require more paragraphs for sure...dont they do 'short story' here'?

I really liked your article. Many lols, my friend.   Le Cejak • <-> (Dec 21 / 03:52)

You have an interesting theme going: make articles that you hate and add crap in there that you think the bozos around here will like. Do you know the story of the Fire Hydrant? Go see So So's userpage.   Le Cejak • <-> (Dec 21 / 03:55)

i was going to 'do' those suggestions..this is the first time i have looked at it since the review..and yes you have already mentioned the hydrant. It was a bhop piece..that alone should have explained it. As for banned users, well when im done ill put it up for review... It will be considered weird, guaranteed. Bet?

Can I...

Come into your vandalisim group you have with Dr. Skullthumper?--Æ 21:40, 21 December 2007 (UTC)

Vandals are an ancient group of barbarians from the north of europe. I and Dr. Skullthumper are weirdos who spend all day on the compu-pu hoping to talk to chicks.   Le Cejak • <-> (Dec 21 / 23:14)

hawt chix wit bewbs.   Le Cejak • <-> (Dec 21 / 23:17)

Can I become a weirdo than?--Æ 23:23, 21 December 2007 (UTC)

You can either be (A) a weirdo, which is cool, or (B) a chick. A chick wit hawt bewbs.   Le Cejak • <-> (Dec 21 / 23:25)

I'm a weirdo. Now can I vandalise your userpage?--Æ 23:26, 21 December 2007 (UTC)

Not today, kiddo. I gots thingz tah do.   Le Cejak • <-> (Dec 21 / 23:27)

Anyway! You can't ask! It would then not be vanalisation, and you would be thrown out of the vandals society. They don't let just any old wierdo in you know. Oh, apparently they do... and you don't want to be hanging around with the likes of these nutters AE anyway. You have important business to attend to regarding the N00b of the month... ;) MrN 23:36, Dec 21

Mr. N! Did you see this???   Le Cejak • <-> (Dec 21 / 23:38)

Sound's interesting. Could be fun to try! Would you be allowed to upload different pictures? I can see a lot of people getting interested in this. You could do it in teams also. Have two people working against two others, that would be cool, you would have to manage the edit conflicts well. Might piss the people monitoring recent changes off though, cos it would spam the hell out of the page. It's a great idea. I will judge it if you want? MrN 23:49, Dec 21

Oh, it's not official really, but I would like anyone at all to say how it went, and if it was a success. Teams? Holy crap that's an awesome idea...   Le Cejak • <-> (Dec 21 / 23:50)

Seriously. This could really catch on. Has nothing like this been done before? There's the turkey thing, but I'm not sure there is anything like this with a short time period like 1 hour. You could call it the "Can you keep it up for an hour challange". Seriously, I think a lot of the other guys might like to try this, but hea, that would mean posting in the dump, and I know your scared of that! MrN 23:58, Dec 21

Wow! I think you're right... Maybe, like 5 separate groups could do it and then get judged at the end of, like, a week? I'll go to village dump if this trial run I'm having with THE goes well. It might actually turn out to be utter shit!   Le Cejak • <-> (Dec 22 / 00:00)

Well I'm not sure about the week thing. Surely the point would be that it would all be over very quickly? The people involved would be given their article tittle at random, and then get an hour, then it's judged probably in the next hour? You could have a voting page which anyone could vote on to decide the best one when the hour was up. Leave the vote open for an hour and then that's it I would say. The point is that everyone would have to be writing at exactly the same time so they did not know what they were up against, and there could be no cheating going on? Maybe it could work with the any hour of the week thing cos that might be the only way to actually get enough people to do it. I duno. It's one of your better ideas it must be said! MrN 00:08, Dec 22

People probably have to know who their opponents are, because the opponent is who gives the article title and whatever else. Also, it has to be done over a long period of time (comparatively long) so that everyone can get organized and sit and think, first of all, but most importantly so that there would be enough people to do it.   Le Cejak • <-> (Dec 22 / 00:12)

Your probably right about the time thing. I meant it would be cool if the competitors had not seen the article they were up against, which I think you can only do if they are done at the same time... MrN 00:19, Dec 22

Here's an idea

• Why?:Cajek won't be able to win the contest--Æ 23:52, 21 December 2007 (UTC)

Ooooh, someone's actin' SPICAY!   Le Cejak • <-> (Dec 21 / 23:53)

You?? Æ 23:54, 21 December 2007 (UTC)

Oh... oh my... that was SPICAY!   Le Cejak • <-> (Dec 21 / 23:55)

Tits.

You boob. MrN 02:40, Dec 22

Hey! How come you're so sure it's ME???   Le Cejak • <-> (Dec 22 / 02:42)

Cos you left a picture of your arse on the photocopier... MrN 02:44, Dec 22

AE says ...

PWNT

“I'm more famous than you”

~ AE on Cajek

That's pretty good, actually.   Le Cejak • <-> (Dec 22 / 14:41)

Well most people are: [1] MrN 14:46, Dec 22

Hey! Use your full name!   Le Cejak • <-> (Dec 22 / 14:47)

And add a quote to my userpage!   Le Cejak • <-> (Dec 22 / 14:47)

You won that fight Cajek--Æ 14:48, 22 December 2007 (UTC)

I did! No I didn't!   Le Cejak • <-> (Dec 22 / 14:49)

Wow! I can't believe I actually got 316 hits [2]! MrN 14:50, Dec 22

haha! That was pathetic Mr. N!!!   Le Cejak • <-> (Dec 22 / 14:51)

HA HA HA! Well, did you do the actual search on cajek? [3]. At least I'm the first hit on google for MrN9000. Your not even the "real" cajek. And. Your sockpuppet is number 2! Your sockpuppet is more important than you. Now that is funny. MrN 15:00, Dec 22

haha omg is my name a type of condom or something?   Le Cejak • <-> (Dec 22 / 15:10)

That might be a good reason to nominate--Æ 15:13, 22 December 2007 (UTC)

No AE. I think that means that the sock is the real user and Cajek is the sockpuppet. Maybe we should nom cajek for sock of the month? MrN 15:15, Dec 22

Your puppetmaster has been nominated--Æ 15:24, 22 December 2007 (UTC)

Have a Mary Christmas

And here is Mary!

Remember: Keep the "X" in X-mas Santa checks his list to see who's been naughty and who's been nice. And naughty always makes out better at X-mas

Dame GUN PotY WotM 2xPotM 17xVFH VFP Poo PMS •YAP• 16:06, 22 December 2007 (UTC)

Oh yeah, "minor" edits.

Forgot. We should probably label our pranks as "minor". Which, I see, you've already done. I'll remember next time, I swear. On a different note, you're a dipwad. – Sir Skullthumper, MD (criticize • writings • critchat) 17:29 Dec 22, 2007

A wad made out of dips, or a wad that simply carries dips?   Le Cejak • <-> (Dec 22 / 17:31)

Wad made out of dips. – Sir Skullthumper, MD (criticize • writings • critchat) 17:31 Dec 22, 2007

You'll pay for that one, herr dockter!   Le Cejak • <-> (Dec 22 / 17:32)

On Emperor Palpatine...

Would just like to know why you reverted my addition of quotes.Bimbo Wales 17:37, 22 December 2007 (UTC)

That wasn't me. I didn't do it. It was Dr. Skullthumper.   Le Cejak • <-> (Dec 22 / 17:38)

But your name appears there! -Bimbo Wales 17:39, 22 December 2007 (UTC)

I didn't do it, though. I mean, I would know, wouldn't I? Go ask Dr. Skullthumper about it, he's an admin.   Le Cejak • <-> (Dec 22 / 17:40)

Hey "Cajek" did it again! Care to explain that? You're an admin too!-Bimbo Wales 17:46, 22 December 2007 (UTC)

Dude, I'm not doing it I swear to god. Dr. Skullthumper is the guy who's in charge around here, you should ask him.   Le Cejak • <-> (Dec 22 / 17:50)

Dude, also I can't wait till you get banned--Æ 18:15, 22 December 2007 (UTC)

SHHHH! OR SKULL WILL HEAR US   Le Cejak • <-> (Dec 22 / 18:16)

So!

Cajek as photographed from space by MrN 20:33, Dec 22

What'd you do this time to get TKF that mad?!?! I wasn't around btw... ~ Mordillo where is my PISS OFF? 19:56, 22 December 2007 (UTC)

Well, I have been giving Gay a good pounding. But I'm starting to run out of juice! MrN 00:32, Dec 23

Mordillo: I'm a vandal, and not the good kind!   Le Cejak • <-> (Dec 23 / 00:33)

Mr. N: Check out Why?:Give Up, and see what happens when I run outta juice.   Le Cejak • <-> (Dec 23 / 00:33)

Shameless... Mind if I have a little fiddle with it? I will not do a 'Full MrN' Honest. You can always revert it if you don't like my changes. MrN 00:38, Dec 23

Uh, okay? Go ahead.   Le Cejak • <-> (Dec 23 / 00:38)

Hope you like my changes. Did not do that much really. This is VFH. I would have nommed it, but I guess you're just looking to improve your self nom record. Good luck. This is definatly one of your better ones, although I do think some of the Pee Review scores you got are a little high. MrN 01:15, Dec 23

I actually was going to ask you twice, but I wasn't convinced you wanted it up there.   Le Cejak • <-> (Dec 23 / 01:17)

It's improved a fair bit since I last saw it. It will be featured I think... MrN 01:19, Dec 23

Pee Review

Uncyclopedia:Pee Review/Why?:Use a wooden condom (RESUB) FOR CAJEK! Thanks for doing the follow up! - UnIdiot | | Talk | Contribs - 01:17, Dec 23

Any ideas?

Looks like Gay is not going to make it. User_talk:MrN9000#I'll feed yer back from someone who voted against. Apparently it's needlessly vulgar? Any suggestions?MrN 13:20, Dec 23

I would suggest starting work on other articles and count this as a loss, and then, in about a month, work on gay a little bit more.   Le Cejak • <-> (Dec 23 / 14:37)

That's good advice. 'needlessly vulgar' though? I don't get that. MrN 14:41, Dec 23

He meant "I didn't want to tell you that I just didn't think it was funny" I think. I get that all the time.   Le Cejak • <-> (Dec 23 / 14:44)

Honestly Cajek

You got what, three bans by now for editing other user pages? Even though it's not vandalism, it's out of boundaries. Eventually, TKF or someone else will infiniban you. Let it go. ~ Mordillo where is my PISS OFF? 15:39, 23 December 2007 (UTC)

Ow! I got Mordillo'd! lol, nah, I'm gonna get infinibanned sometime but I always get out of my bans on IRC. I even talked ZB out of a ban. Besides, vandalizing each others' userpages is like when a group of gorillas start grooming. It enhances team spirit. Oh wait, that's football   Le Cejak • <-> (Dec 23 / 15:46)

This is not going to work forever. Eventually someone will get pissed off. Just let it go. ~ Mordillo where is my PISS OFF? 16:05, 23 December 2007 (UTC)

ok Mordillo. Sorry, man.   Le Cejak • <-> (Dec 23 / 16:07)

Got to side with Mordillo on this one, I know what ya mean about the user page thing Cajek, it is fun and all, but it's obviously not looked on well by the 'community' at large. I think that's because it would be rather difficult for all the admins to keep track of who was allowed to mess with whos page and who is not. That's asking a bit too much of the lazy bastards our glorious leaders... It's probably best to keep it to the banter to the talk pages, or perhaps the user sub pages... Know what I mean dude? MrN 17:07, Dec 23

Return? Or glamorous return?

Well, neither, to be truthful. I've been here all along, just doing more readin'/hidin' that writin'/editin'. Why do you ask? --Farley of the Sheep-Filled Meadows Try not to puke...(Please!) 16:58, 23 December 2007 (UTC)

Dude, you're gonna get a feature.   Le Cejak • <-> (Dec 23 / 17:11)

I would blink and put on a surprised expression if my face would let me! :D Farley of the Sheep-Filled Meadows Try not to puke...(Please!) 23:44, 23 December 2007 (UTC)

Ok, you have suckered me in..

So If I use "quick edit" there is less chance of an edit conflict right? I assume you know what quick edit is.... MrN 19:50, Dec 23

Suckered you in to what now? I'm sorry, I'm distracted!   Le Cejak • <-> (Dec 23 / 19:53)