User:Cajek/Archive8
Jump to navigation
Jump to search
![]() | This page is an archive. The contents have been moved from another page for reference purposes only, and should be preserved in their current form. Discussion or voting on this page is not current. Any additions you make will probably not be read. The current version of this page can be found at User:Cajek/Pee. |
Uncyclopedia:Pee Review/Game:Death Row (Scene B: Take 2) by UU.Checking own, blah blah. --UU - natter18:09, Nov 30
Uncyclopedia:Pee Review/My visit with Aunt Myfanwy by Vader1941.Not really. No advice to speak of. Close, but... Nah. --UU - natter18:09, Nov 30
Uncyclopedia:Pee Review/Cleveland Steamers by Mnbvcxz.Thereabouts. --UU - natter09:14, Nov 29
Uncyclopedia:Pee Review/Terminator: The Sarah Connor Chronicles by A.Z?123.No. --UU - natter09:14, Nov 29
Uncyclopedia:Pee Review/HowTo:Fail an Exam by Nachlader.Yup. --UU - natter09:14, Nov 29
Uncyclopedia:Pee Review/Cloud V.S. Sephiroth by IronLung.Thereabouts. --UU - natter09:14, Nov 29
Uncyclopedia:Pee Review/UnNews:Researchers make breakthrough in UFO research by Necropaxx.Checking my own. You disagree, you change. :) • • • Necropaxx (T) {~} 00:35, Nov 26Uncyclopedia:Pee Review/Heat Magazine by Nachlader.Very very in-depth. • • • Necropaxx (T) {~} 00:35, Nov 26Uncyclopedia:Pee Review/Helaba by UU.Checking own etc. Yes. --UU - natter21:57, Nov 24
Uncyclopedia:Pee Review/vortex by Necropaxx.A fine job. --UU - natter21:57, Nov 24
Uncyclopedia:Pee Review/Middler Bowling by UU.Yes, checking own, disagree = change, etc etc. --UU - natter21:57, Nov 24
Uncyclopedia:Pee Review/Latios and Latias by JamesM123.Tough call. I'm going to say no, although for a first review it does at least try to say more than just "make it funnier". Really don't agree with it, but that's an opinion thing. Borderline. --UU - natter12:27, Nov 22
Uncyclopedia:Pee Review/Vanilla Ice by UU.Checked my own again. You disagree, you change. --UU - natter12:27, Nov 22
Uncyclopedia:Pee Review/China's Retard Extermination Policy (a little (quick)ly, if you would please.) by Joe9320.No. --UU - natter09:45, Nov 22
Uncyclopedia:Pee Review/Double Butter Theory by Asahatter.Yup. --UU - natter09:45, Nov 22
Uncyclopedia:Pee Review/Ned Flan-Diddily Flanders by Nachlader.Can't argue that it's not in-depth, so yes, and I agree with the score and the points raised. But it's a little brutal, could be more friendly. --UU - natter09:45, Nov 22
Uncyclopedia:Pee Review/Wikipedia Chase! (resubmit) by Mnbvcxz.Yes, a more encouraging effort than Epitheton too. --UU - natter09:18, Nov 22
Uncyclopedia:Pee Review/Spore Numero Due by Mnbvcxz.Thereabouts. --UU - natter09:18, Nov 22
Uncyclopedia:Pee Review/Fred Reich by Mnbvcxz.Yup. --UU - natter09:18, Nov 22
Uncyclopedia:Pee Review/black metal (re-submission) by Fag.Yep. Good to see you back, Fag! --UU - natter13:33, Nov 21
Uncyclopedia:Pee Review/Epitheton epitheta by Mnbvcxz.Can't really give it - the only constructive help was for formatting, while the humour and concept were one liners about being random. Needs moar encouragement. --UU - natter09:18, Nov 22
Uncyclopedia:Pee Review/slow motion by MrN.Let me thi... sure. --UU - natter13:33, Nov 21
Uncyclopedia:Pee Review/Movie Of Lady Whose Ankle Is Showing by Harsh Noise.Can't give it - the bulk of the advice consisted of "add more humour". Would have been fine for a quick, but it's not a quick. --UU - natter13:24, Nov 21
Uncyclopedia:Pee Review/The Racial Draft by Mnbvcxz.Also yep. --UU - natter10:11, Nov 19
Uncyclopedia:Pee Review/Limp Dick by Mnbvcxz.Yep. --UU - natter10:11, Nov 19
Uncyclopedia:Pee Review/ Why?:Do I Like Tango and Cash? by Necropaxx.As the reviewee, I'd say so. --UU - natter10:11, Nov 19
Uncyclopedia:Pee Review/YourKidDies.net by Guybles.First instinct is to say no, but on viewing the article in question, I'm not sure what else there is to say about it, so yes. --UU - natter11:43, Nov 18
Uncyclopedia:Pee Review/HowTo:Be Emo by Nachlader.Yup. --UU - natter11:43, Nov 18
Uncyclopedia:Pee Review/Tom DeLonge (Cyberman) by MrN9000.Yep. --UU - natter10:56, Nov 16
Uncyclopedia:Pee Review/HowTo:Win a Darwin Award by BlueYonder.Yep. --UU - natter10:56, Nov 16
Uncyclopedia:Pee Review/UnNews:Man Harasses Woman at Drive-Thru by Nachlader.Yep. --UU - natter10:56, Nov 16
Uncyclopedia:Pee Review/Golf War (Rewrite) by AhhDiddums.One line per box. No. --UU - natter12:00, Nov 13
Uncyclopedia:Pee Review/Uncyclopedia Transit Authority by Nachlader.Plenty of advice. --UU - natter12:00, Nov 13
Uncyclopedia:Pee Review/Consett by I like cheese.I'd say. Enough advice given. --UU - natter12:00, Nov 13
Uncyclopedia:Pee Review/How To:Spark a Rebellion by Nachlader.Yes, although a bit insulting. Let's keep this friendly, huh? --UU - natter12:49, Nov 12
Uncyclopedia:Pee Review/Madagascar (film) by Guybles.Yes. Wasn't going to be, but then he added more stuff. --UU - natter12:49, Nov 12
Uncyclopedia:Pee Review/No Country for Old Men (film) by SysRq.Uh huh. --UU - natter22:21, Nov 11
Uncyclopedia:Pee Review/Horton Hears a Who! (film) by UU.Yup. (You disagree etc). --UU - natter22:21, Nov 11
Uncyclopedia:Pee Review/Ray Stevens by UU.Yup. (You disagree, you change). --UU - natter22:21, Nov 11
Uncyclopedia:Pee Review/Pulitzer Prize by Nachlader.Yep. --UU - natter11:17, Nov 10
Uncyclopedia:Pee Review/Tails the Straight by MrN.But of course. --UU - natter11:17, Nov 10
Uncyclopedia:Pee Review/UnNews:Barack Obama accused of being too left-handed by BlueYonder.Yep. --UU - natter11:17, Nov 10
Uncyclopedia:Pee Review/User:Manwithnoname/Naruto by Mnbvcxz.No. Too short, and no advice beyond "don't bother". --UU - natter11:17, Nov 10
Uncyclopedia:Pee Review/Potatohead (second draft) by Mnbvcxz.Just about. --UU - natter11:17, Nov 10
Uncyclopedia:Pee Review/Poo futures by Mnbvcxz.Yeh. --UU - natter11:17, Nov 10
Uncyclopedia:Pee Review/Dirty Harry (quick) by MrN.A MrN review! I'd forgotten what they looked like! (Yup). --UU - natter11:17, Nov 10
Uncyclopedia:Pee Review/Yad by PaddyAtkinson.Wrong side of borderline - as he says himself, not that helpful. --UU - natter08:43, Nov 8
Uncyclopedia:Pee Review/concerned signmakers by Nachlader.Most certainly. --UU - natter08:43, Nov 8
Uncyclopedia:Pee Review/Why?:Did I just read Twilight? (resubmit for SysRq) by SysRq.Aye. --UU - natter08:43, Nov 8
Uncyclopedia:Pee Review/10,000 B.C. by Asahatter.At first, it looked borderline, but for stub with not much more than one line, this is in-depth. --UU - natter08:43, Nov 8
Uncyclopedia:Pee Review/No country for old men by BlueYonder.Yup. --UU - natter08:43, Nov 8
Uncyclopedia:Pee Review/UnNews:Economic Crisis going to plan by Nachlader.Yes. --UU - natter08:43, Nov 8
Uncyclopedia:Pee Review/Buddha Article Revamp by UU.Yup. Though to be honest it looked just like a template... SK Sir Orian57TalkRotM 21:52 5 November 2008
Uncyclopedia:Pee Review/UnBooks: An 82 Year Old Woman Wants My Body! by the returning SysRq!Welcome back bud. --UU - natter16:55, Nov 5
Uncyclopedia:Pee Review/Why?:Is There a Moose On This Plane? by Nachlader.Yepper. --UU - natter16:55, Nov 5
Uncyclopedia:Pee Review/50 Cent by Mnbvcxz.Yep. --UU - natter16:55, Nov 5
Uncyclopedia:Pee Review/UnNews:Paul Freeman's acting career dead at 41 by Mnbvcxz.I'd say so. --UU - natter16:55, Nov 5
Uncyclopedia:Pee Review/A Tinge of Minge (redux) by UU.Checking my own again. Change it if you disagree. --UU - natter16:55, Nov 5
Uncyclopedia:Pee Review/Regulation by Necropaxx.Yep. --UU - natter16:55, Nov 5
Uncyclopedia:Pee Review/UnNews:Those Necrophiliacs Are At It Again! by Mnbvcxz.Yup again. Promising start. --UU - natter09:43, Nov 4
Uncyclopedia:Pee Review/Insurance Policy Fetish by Mnbvcxz.Yup. --UU - natter09:43, Nov 4
Uncyclopedia:Pee Review/(quick)Daron Malakian by UU.Yes, I checked my own again. You disagree, you change, yes? --UU - natter09:43, Nov 4
Uncyclopedia:Pee Review/Loopy de loop by Knucmo2.Yup. --UU - natter22:12, Nov 3
Uncyclopedia:Pee Review/The Wurzels by Nachlader.Yup. --UU - natter22:12, Nov 3
Uncyclopedia:Pee Review/UnNews:Adam Sandler expresses concerns that his next film ‘might not be shitty enough’ by Padddy5.One line per box? Nope. --UU - natter22:12, Nov 3