Uncyclopedia talk:Forest Fire Week/archive2

With regards to tagging

Talk Archives

• Uncyclopedia talk:Forest Fire Week/archive1
• Uncyclopedia talk:Forest Fire Week/archive2

Please add "+FFW" somewhere in your edit summary so I can distinguish tagging from normal edits in Special:RecentChanges. ｡◕‿◕｡ 01:02, 30 August 2013 (UTC)

Just a reminder

This template exists. Make sure to use it if you find something randomly funny that isn't appropriate for Uncyclopedia but appropriate for Illogicopedia. RedHot (talk) 02:27, 30 August 2013 (UTC)

Pages tagged with {{Fix}}

can be found at [{{#fullurl:Special:WhatLinksHere/Template:Fix|hidelinks=1&hideredirs=1}} this special page]. ｡◕‿◕｡ 13:17, 30 August 2013 (UTC)

I think you mean this. -- The Zombiebaron 17:12, 30 August 2013 (UTC)

Everything is in a subcategory so it's hard to see everything all at once. ｡◕‿◕｡ 17:18, 30 August 2013 (UTC)

There are 10 pages in the category, 4 of which I have tagged in the past 24 hours. What are you talking about? -- The Zombiebaron 17:22, 30 August 2013 (UTC)

Oh I see. If you go here there are a bunch more pages. Looks like some of the fix sub-templates aren't working as proper maintenance templates. -- The Zombiebaron 17:29, 30 August 2013 (UTC)

There's an article I want to tag

I want to tag Pokémon (video games series), but it's protected. (Bumping should be OK for this forum since this is FFW.) ｡◕‿◕｡ 13:31, 30 August 2013 (UTC)

Done. Sir Modusoperandi ^Boinc! 16:12, 30 August 2013 (UTC)

WTF? This is a very good article. Please, can the admins ride this thing well and not let this kind of tagging happen. Eeeeecccchhhhh! Aleister 17:14 30-8-'13]]

Rules changed?????

The horror of Forest Fire Week seems to be here, but I don't recognize some of the rules. I thought that if a page is tagged that anyone can remove that tag. And there was no rule that once a page is tagged it either has to be huffed, moved to main space, or "improved"??? Everyone is the ultimate critic now, and can create havoc on the uncy? This is the worse idea since white bread, and so I'm asking for a clarification of the rules. It used to be that all admins would be vigilant in removing tags on articles which shouldn't be tagged - I remember in the last one some people were tagging six or seven a minute (Seriously, they were doing that and it seemed to be okay. Weird.) Anyway, yeah, the horror, the horror, gut the site ten red links at a time. Aleister 17:10 30-8-'13]]

I copy and pasted the rules from last time. Nothing was changed. -- The Zombiebaron 17:15, 30 August 2013 (UTC)

In every dull rock, there's a ruby

Or there may be. Likewise, try to look for ideas for new articles in the crap articles when you tag them. Keep a notepad nearby so you can jot down every idea that comes to you as you peruse the crap. You're bound to find a tiny gem that could be grown and/or developed into a beautiful article. If everyone tagging articles does this, our content would become so much better overnight.

ZB, please add something like this to the guidelines. ｡◕‿◕｡ 20:08, 30 August 2013 (UTC)

*raises hand*

Will all the articles tagged for burnination be huffed on September 6th, or will they be huffed a week from the point they've been tagged? All rise for Acmed2 (talk) 13:53, 2 September 2013 (UTC)

Pages will get deleted 7 days after they were tagged. -- The Zombiebaron 18:18, 2 September 2013 (UTC)\

Thanks, and fuck you Happymonkey39. All rise for Acmed2 (talk) 21:16, 2 September 2013 (UTC)

Thats what you get for being polite and politically correct! -Happymonkey39 Dah Meme Master 22:03, 2 September 2013 (UTC)

*Yells out a question rudely even though the guy before me raised his hand*

What is this fire danger scale thingy? Every article I put a tag on gets a low warning but I see other ones with a really high one. Is it to show how many I have tagged or what? --Happymonkey39 Dah Meme Master 14:42, 2 September 2013 (UTC)

It indicates how long ago the article was tagged. I think higher danger means it will be huffed sooner. Kindly raise your hand next time. ｡◕‿◕｡ 14:50, 2 September 2013 (UTC)

Screw that! I got answered first! --Happymonkey39 Dah Meme Master 15:04, 2 September 2013 (UTC)

Typical

My internet goes out for 2 days right at the end of FFW. Oh well, I hope I burned enough to end in the top 25 or so :P --Happymonkey39 Dah Meme Master 22:54, 6 September 2013 (UTC)

Wait, there's a score for us? All rise for Acmed2 (talk) 16:38, 7 September 2013 (UTC)

Last time it listed off who got the most burned articles... Idk if they plan on listing them again. I hope so, I take everything as competition :P --Happymonkey39 Dah Meme Master 22:25, 7 September 2013 (UTC)