Uncyclopedia:VFH/UnBooks:Ex Box

Article: UnBooks:Ex_Box	Score: -5
Nominated by:	This article is somewhat wrong, but I laughed harder than I have at most highlighted articles, so you should go read it and enjoy. Myocardialinfarction 23:43, October 6, 2010 (UTC)
For: 0	No for votes
Against: 5	Against. I don't see this as a feature. Might appeal to those who are still in the spot squeezing phase in life. *RomArtusImperator ® (Orate) 08:36, October 7, 2010 (UTC) Against. I'm just not seeing it. The pics are enough to turn me away from it. --Wilytank 15:04, October 7, 2010 (UTC) Against. per above. Mn-z 17:02, October 7, 2010 (UTC) Nah. There's some good stuff in here, but not enough to make it a feature. —Sir Socky** (talk) (stalk) GUN SotM UotM PMotM UotY PotM WotM 02:20, 8 October 2010 Against. Because I'm that one user who always votes against this kind of thing. ~ shifty eyes (talk) (stalk) -- 20101008 - 02:46 (UTC)
Comments	Life will never be the same for you once you read a few of Maniac1075's pages. Enter at your own risk. If you do not come out in two hours, we will come in looking for you. Aleister 1:08 7 10 "Nauseated" means sickened. "Nauseous" means sickening. This is a mistake that's too far gone to prevent from becoming an accepted usage, so I have no idea why I'm bringing it up. I remember one of those old English Teacher in Japan blog guys going on about students having trouble with "getting sick" and "sickening", and would state they were sickening, and that he'd have trouble not laughing. It's like that only with everyone including people who really should know better, not just non-native speakers. It's worst when medical doctors do it; it's almost like Carter, a nuclear engineer and a southerner, saying newkular - do you give him a pass or hold him to a higher standard? --monika 03:02, October 7, 2010 (UTC) Abstain. Amusing in parts, I just found a bit too gross for me. I think it also strays into ED territory a bit. Sycamore (Talk) 11:29, October 7, 2010 (UTC)