| Article: Joseph Ducreux
|
Score: -3
|
| Nominated by:
|
Skinfan13 07:00, January 20, 2010 (UTC)
|
For: 1
|
- For. I know, I wrote this, but I put it up for review and 2 weeks later no bites, so what the hell, hope you all like it. --Sir Skinfan13 Talk {< CUN RotM FBotM VFH ΥΣΣ Maj. SK >} 07:13, January 20, 2010 (UTC)
|
Against: 4
|
- Not yet. There's an good idea here but it's not well executed. -- slimy Ape (pasteurize) (Riot Porn) 06:38, January 21, 2010 (UTC)
- Against. An interesting article but undercooked as regards some ideas and unnecessary crude expressions which don't fit (e.g. last paragraph) its overall style in my view.
 RomArtus*Imperator ® (Orate) 06:58, January 21, 2010 (UTC)
- Needs a bit more work. —Sir Socky
   (talk) (stalk)  GUN SotM UotM PMotM UotY PotM WotM 07:11, 21 January 2010
- Against. As it stands, 'tis not ready, and I'd advise you to be patient and wait for that review. But don't be discouraged - as the others note, there's plenty of potential here, and with a polish up and a little more work, I'd expect to see it back here, doing rather better. --UU - natter
 14:09, Jan 21
|
| Comments
|
- Comment. Are you allowed to put your own templates onto an article in the main space? --RomArtus*Imperator ® (Orate) 22:40, January 20, 2010 (UTC)
|
VFH
← Back to summary VFH
← Back to full VFH
