Forum:Too many games

From Uncyclopedia, the content-free encyclopedia
Jump to navigation Jump to search
Forums: Index > Village Dump > Too many games
Note: This topic has been unedited for 6098 days. It is considered archived - the discussion is over. Do not add to unless it really needs a response.

Game, or The Game, may refer to:

Pretzel disambig.svg

This is a disambiguation page.
Of course, nobody cares.

Now, this may sound controversial, but I think we should delete a couple of these. Or just move them to Uncyclopedia:Departure of Fun. --L 05:56, 8 April 2007 (UTC)
Sure. If we are going to delete, maybe we could set up a gameVFD just for this one time? I say let's see what users think first. —Braydie 06:02, 8 April 2007 (UTC)
Why would we need a gameVFD? Doesn't VFD work just fine? --EMC [TALK] 08:16, 8 April 2007 (UTC)
I mean just below here. Adding games to VFD as well as the flow of articles that we get now means flooding (which now comes with a free 1 day ban). —Braydie 11:27, 8 April 2007 (UTC)

I think we should vote them out based on quality, not because we have too many of those, it's like voting out main namespace articles for the reason of being too many. ~Jewriken.GIF 09:10, 8 April 2007 (UTC)

I guess I see your point - some of these are rather rubbish things by a single user that never got finished - and an equivalent article would get ICUed or VFDed. Couldn't we just have some votes here (where they'll get seen) rather than setting up a new page nobody can find? (The trouble with regular VFD is it's geared to single pages - if you're not careful we'll just end up with a bunch of title-pageless games.) Having said all that, I do agree with Mordillo, and I can't say I'll be voting delete on very many of these games - most of them are either suitably bizarre offshoots of one of the main games, or they have something different enough to amuse. --Strange.PNG (but) Untrue  Whhhy?Whut?How? *Back from the dead* 11:24, 8 April 2007 (UTC)

I was just thinking out loud....while typing. I'd say just below here. —Braydie 11:27, 8 April 2007 (UTC)

Why not just make a separate disambiguation page for the less-liked games? It would make more sense then moving them to a different article. Lord Gneo 15:48, 11 April 2007 (UTC)

Because deleting them all would be faster and far more appropriate. Because by and large they all suck ass. Bone F clear.png Sir Famine, Gun Petition » 04/11 21:53

The IP that created The adventures of a Grue has registered as User:Naughty Budgie. —Another Pongo Flame Sandbox 11:30, 16 April 2007 (UTC)

Ahhhh...well, how about being like a normal American and ignoring the problem? Or perhaps, if it REALLY does bug you THAT much, it would be a whole lot quicker to delete them, I suppose. Lord Gneo 15:54, 16 April 2007 (UTC)

It's a good thing that no-one wants to delete Grueslayer, because it is not deletion material. User:Trar/sig2

I second that. —Another Pongo Flame Sandbox 10:00, 21 April 2007 (UTC)
We have less than enough games. Marshal Uncyclopedian! Talk to me!

Votes

Note: Old Discussions are at Forum:Too many games/Archive

Vote for deletion: Game:MMORPG

Keep
  • Keep Played this the other day. Admittedly it doesn't finish, but it's a nice concept and deserves to live on current content alone. --Strange.PNG (but) Untrue  Whhhy?Whut?How? *Back from the dead* 18:47, 7 May 2007 (UTC)
Delete
  • Self-nom and delete I'm never going to finish it, and what has been expanded on by others is of fairly low quality. However, if any experienced implementor wishes to adopt it, I'd be grateful. A. N. Otherpongo (Parp!/SB/Grueslayer/VFD//»AAAAAAAAA!) 15:42, 7 May 2007 (UTC)
Comments

Vote for deletion: Uncyclopedia:Departure of Fun/Auto-Novel

Keep
Delete
  1. L 10:49, 4 May 2007 (UTC)
Comments