Forum:The dump reads like

From Uncyclopedia, the content-free encyclopedia
Jump to navigation Jump to search
Forums: Index > Village Dump > The dump reads like
Note: This topic has been unedited for 6284 days. It is considered archived - the discussion is over. Do not add to unless it really needs a response.

old alt.slack archives. - David Gerard 11:25, 28 September 2006 (UTC)

LOLZ --Gay2.gifIMBJRGay2.gif 13:37, 29 September 2006 (UTC)
I BLAME YOU. - David Gerard 12:59, 2 October 2006 (UTC)
I, personally, now this is just me talking here, like the random subject matter, rants and varying amounts of incoherence provided by reading these forums. With them I can not only not learn something new, but forget important things that I'm not supposed to remember. We've got a ways to go before we reach Subgenius level, though that's just a guess as the closest I've been to Bob was that track in the first Need-for-speed (Road&Track) game with the Bob signs everyway. But I digress...--Sir Modusoperandi Boinc! 15:11, 28 September 2006 (UTC)
I, use the Forum to vent my rage and built up nonhumor through stupid comments like this one. Oh, and it also helps linkwhores get their fix. --The Zombiebaron 00:20, 29 September 2006 (UTC)
How do we know it isn't the old alt.slack archives that have been altered to look just like the Village Dump, and your memory of them cleverly manipulated by modern brainwave-regression technology in order to make you remember them the way they look now, as opposed to back then?  c • > • cunwapquc? 00:29, 29 September 2006 (UTC)
Is that the plot of Total Recall?--Witt, Union leader.gif of Union member.gif UNion Entertain me* 02:02, 29 September 2006 (UTC)
Don't know, I've completely forgotten...  c • > • cunwapquc? 05:03, 29 September 2006 (UTC)
This is an excellent thread. Totally top-notch. Who made that delicious template? It's also top-notch. Why aren't you writing when you have all this bottled-up talent spewing forth in this forum thread? Dawg.gif » Brig Sir Dawg | t | v | c » 03:46, 2 October 2006 (UTC)
Don't know, I've completely forgotten that too...  c • > • cunwapquc? 04:58, 2 October 2006 (UTC)