Forum:Censure

Forums: Index > Village Dump > Censure

Note: This topic has been unedited for 6289 days. It is considered archived - the discussion is over. Do not add to unless it really needs a response.

I have created four articles that have been deleted. Strangely enough, it included all three of my anti-American articles. Is this the Ameriscumcyclopedia? I would wish to get back the articles Devolution, William Kristol and Ecclesiastes if that is ok. Probably not, i should probably have to bend to the will of the empire with the greatest morale on earth (quoted from mr. Kristol).--Daanschr 20:46, 29 November 2006 (UTC)

I recommed talking directly to the admins who deleted these. Glancing at the logs I found:

15:31, 29 November 2006 Hinoa4 huffed "Devolution" (Uncyc Deletion Protocol 1.2: Fails quality control. FIRE IN THE HOLE!)
12:06, 18 November 2006 Todd Lyons huffed "Devolution" (2.6 Ceremonially burnt at Forest Fire Week celebrations)
17:49, 14 November 2006 Hindleyite huffed "William Kristol" (2.3 NRV expired)
17:50, 14 November 2006 Hindleyite huffed "Ecclesiastes" (2.3 NRV expired)
They can probably restore the pages to subpages of your userpage. --Sir Zombiebaron 20:58, 29 November 2006 (UTC)

Also, I think a lot of people here would take issue with 'Ameriscumcyclopedia'. Look at the articles on George Bush, Republicans, Conservatives, Right-wing, Daily Mail, etc - search any topic you like, it's more likely you'll find a liberal slant on it than anything else.
We aren't Republicanopedia - it's more likely that your articles were deleted because they were, well, crap. Forest Fire Week is a week in which admins have leave to fire at will, and expiry of an NRV tag without an article being improved since the tag was put on is a perfectly legitimate reason anytime. Nothing to do with the subject matter of your articles, or the slant - just the content. -- 21:19, 29 November 2006 (UTC)

While most articles have a liberal slant on them, I have worked hard writing for articles that make fun of Liberalism. Non-God-Fearing Democrats, I can't believe it's not Liberalism!, Holy Bible: Revised Liberal Edition, HowTo:Be a liberal and many others. Some I adopted the article and wrote in the same style as the person who started it, others I started from scratch and others added to it. Weri Long Wang has American liberals and worked on the Liberals articles. So yes, Uncyclopedia while being mostly Liberal slanted, does also have articles that make fun of Liberals. In fact, Uncyclopedia tries to cover almost every possible political view, and if not we can create articles in those views. --Lt. Sir Orion Blastar (talk) 23:30, 30 November 2006 (UTC)

Censure? You mean Censor(ship)? Or are you trying to make a pun? -- §. | WotM | PLS | T | C | A 04:40, 30 November 2006 (UTC)

Methinks he was joking about how most American highschool students wouldn't know the difference between the two. --The Acceptable  Cainad  (Fnord) 00:56, 5 December 2006 (UTC)

I present the above as evidence that Squiggle is not 13, and lied about his age to make his writing seem that much more amazing. -- » Sir Savethemooses Grand Commanding Officer ... holla atcha boy» 02:00, 5 December 2006 (UTC)

I present the above as evidence that STM is (emotionally) 13, and lied about his maturity to buy beer. Or, to be more precise, sucker me into "booting" beer for him. Then he egged my car. Or, if it wasn't STM, it was some other guy. Or not. Also, sometimes it hurts when my tongue is in my cheek. Like now.--Sir Modusoperandi ^Boinc! 03:17, 5 December 2006 (UTC)

I would like to submit the above comment to VFH. All votes below. -- » Sir Savethemooses Grand Commanding Officer ... holla atcha boy» 05:25, 5 December 2006 (UTC)

That one thing Modus said

Score: -2

• Nom and STRONG AGAINST Total crap. -- » Sir Savethemooses Grand Commanding Officer ... holla atcha boy» 05:25, 5 December 2006 (UTC)
• Against, I, for one, agree with whatever it was that I said.--Sir Modusoperandi ^Boinc! 05:50, 5 December 2006 (UTC)