Forum:Awgh! These topics are gouge-your-eyes-out-ugly!

From Uncyclopedia, the content-free encyclopedia
Jump to navigation Jump to search
Forums: Index > Village Dump > Awgh! These topics are gouge-your-eyes-out-ugly! (talk)
Note: This topic has been unedited for 5681 days. It is considered archived - the discussion is over. Do not add to unless it really needs a response.

Ok, ok, so I know I don't really use these forums, in-fact this is my first topic thingy, BUT... These topics are so messy and ugly and stuff what with the huge amount of indentation and things...Wouldn't it be so much better if we separated each user-comment-thing by a line (----) and your sig is on a seperate line to everything else before this line...? Just so that you can read nicely what the hell is going on... So like if this is the end of my post...
- 06:09 5 AprilSir FSt. (QotF BFF NotM) YTTETalk!Read!Sign!Whore!CMC!Pee!


And now the next post...That demonstration was for anyone who didn't get what I'd just being saying, cause I know I'm crap when I come to explaining things... Anyway, what do you think? Won't it make things neater and prettier??? (I'm a big fan of neatness and prettiness (in the virtual world anyway...)
- 06:09 5 AprilSir FSt. (QotF BFF NotM) YTTETalk!Read!Sign!Whore!CMC!Pee!

Indentification works fine. Sir Modusoperandi Boinc! 19:32, 5 April 2008 (UTC)
See? Sir Modusoperandi Boinc! 19:32, 5 April 2008 (UTC)
It only doesn't work... Sir Modusoperandi Boinc! 19:32, 5 April 2008 (UTC)
...when people reply wrong. Sir Modusoperandi Boinc! 19:32, 5 April 2008 (UTC)

Add this magic code to your CSS to make the forums less ugly

.ns-110 #content, .ns-111 #p-cactions li, .ns-111 #p-cactions li a {background: #F8FCFF;}
.ns-110 dd { margin: 0; padding: 0; }
.ns-110 dl { border-top: solid 1px #70E0E0; border-left: solid 1px #70E0E0; padding-top: 0.5em; padding-left: 0.5em; margin-left: 1em; }
.ns-110 dl { background-color: #EEF6FF; }
.ns-110 dl dl { background-color: #F8FCFF; }
.ns-110 dl dl dl { background-color: #EEF6FF; }
.ns-110 dl dl dl dl { background-color: #F8FCFF; }
.ns-110 dl dl dl dl dl { background-color: #EEF6FF; }
.ns-110 dl dl dl dl dl dl { background-color: #F8FCFF; }
.ns-110 dl dl dl dl dl dl dl { background-color: #EEF6FF; }
.ns-110 dl dl dl dl dl dl dl dl { background-color: #F8FCFF; }
.ns-110 dl dl dl dl dl dl dl dl dl { background-color: #EEF6FF; }
.ns-110 dl dl dl dl dl dl dl dl dl dl { background-color: #F8FCFF; }
.ns-110 dl dl dl dl dl dl dl dl dl dl dl { background-color: #EEF6FF; }
.ns-110 dl dl dl dl dl dl dl dl dl dl dl dl { background-color: #F8FCFF; }
.ns-110 dl dl dl dl dl dl dl dl dl dl dl dl dl { background-color: #EEF6FF; }
.ns-110 dl dl dl dl dl dl dl dl dl dl dl dl dl dl { background-color: #F8FCFF; }

Then, clear your cache and give a complex-looking forum a gander.  Sir Skullthumper, MD (criticize  writings  critchat) 19:36 Apr 05, 2008

Oh, very pretty Skullthumper! How come this code isn't in the general uncyc css file...or is it, I'm pretty sure I saw it there...- 09:28 5 AprilSir FSt. (QotF BFF NotM) YTTETalk!Read!Sign!Whore!CMC!Pee!
For no apparent reason, it's on the Forum_talk: namespace instead of the Forum:. And considering almost no one uses Forum_talk: because it's kinda redundant... I have no idea why it's there.  Sir Skullthumper, MD (criticize  writings  critchat) 20:37 Apr 05, 2008
Well a sysop needs to change that, cause that css is much better, much clearer (still not as good as my before-mentioned idea, :-D ) but good! - 09:44 5 AprilSir FSt. (QotF BFF NotM) YTTETalk!Read!Sign!Whore!CMC!Pee!
The sysops are too lazy, and your idea wouldn't work in practice. According to your theory, all conversations happen linearly. A really involved discussion doesn't, and it'd be impossible to see who's replying to who, or where the original post they were replying to is... and so on.  Sir Skullthumper, MD (criticize  writings  critchat) 20:49 Apr 05, 2008
This is just not a priority issue. There's huffing to be done, people to ban, and pages to feature. Only "enthusiastic" new sysops would try and do this low-priority work. Tophatsig.png 5/04/2008 @ 21:09
...nah, they're just lazy.  Sir Skullthumper, MD (criticize  writings  critchat) 21:11 Apr 05, 2008
/me lazily look at my ban hammer ~Jewriken.GIF 21:48, 5 April 2008 (UTC)
See? Too lazy to even make "look" into a proper verb. Sig pic.PNG Unsolicited conversation Extravagant beauty PEEING 21:52, 5 April 2008 (UTC)
tu! Lazy sysops it doesn't require that much effort! Pah! Also my idea is based on the most popular forum software: phpBB (mainly there are other software that uses the same technique) where you have a linear conversation. It is much clearer! I was just thinking we could try and replicate the clarity of that a bit, but... - 12:10 5 AprilSir FSt. (QotF BFF NotM) YTTETalk!Read!Sign!Whore!CMC!Pee!
I think nobody's done that because it's hella ugly. Spang talk 22:43, 06 Apr 2008