From Uncyclopedia, the content-free encyclopedia
Jump to navigation
Jump to search
| Article: Top hat
|
Score: 16 superior headresses
|
| Nominated by:
|
• • • Necropaxx (T) {~} 22:43, 5 November 2007 (UTC)
|
For: 16
|
- Self nom and For. This article's been reviewed five times, the last review earning a score of 49/50 from emc himself. So I thought I'd give it a go. • • • Necropaxx (T) {~} 22:43, 5 November 2007 (UTC)
- indubitably! this hasn't been featured yet? preposterous! --SirGerrycheeversGunTalk 23:06, 5 November 2007 (UTC)
- 4 - P.M., WotM, & GUN, Sir Led Balloon
 (Tick Tock) (Contribs) 23:58, Nov 5
- For, wot? Sir Groovester | Contributions | Talk Page 02:27, 6 November 2007 (UTC)
- For. Top hole, what? --Sir Under User (Hi, How Are You?) VFH KUN 09:32, 6 November 2007 (UTC)
- For EugeneKay wuz here (whine thank) 12:06, 6 November 2007 (UTC)
- For. Wonderful article.--
 Sir Claudius CUN VFH (carpe diem) 14:35, 6 November 2007 (UTC)
- For! I can't believe it's not crass! (cause it isn't!) Very good indeed! --CopperCore(Talk)(Contribs) 18:15, 6 November 2007 (UTC)
- Cheerio good lair! --EMC [TALK] 22:55, 7 November 2007 (UTC)
- For. /me tips cap Sir Modusoperandi Boinc! 00:41, 8 November 2007 (UTC)
- Fot I would of course wear such a hat with a smile and a spoon. mAttlobster. (hello) 16:03, 10 November 2007 (UTC)
- Obligatory for ~
 Jacques Pirat, Esq. Converse : Benefactions : U.w.p. 11/11/2007 @ 16:34
- For I find it funny. It seem British to me. ----Pleb- Sawblade5 [coolest link ever] ( yell | FAQ | I did this ) 07:57, 15 November 2007 (UTC)
- For --PET
 17:52, 16 November 2007 (UTC)
- For. -- Mitch
 11:20, 17 November 2007 (UTC)
- Excellent - jack mort | cunt | talk
 - 13:08, 19 November 2007 (UTC)
|
Against: 0
|
No against votes
|
| Comments
|
- Comment. Wow! I left this for one day and already seven other users professed their love for my article! That's never happened before. I feel like I should make a speech or something. Thanks, all. • • • Necropaxx (T) {~} 20:20, 6 November 2007 (UTC)
- Abstain Can't bring myself to vote against, because there is some good stuff. But a lot of it just seems to be unfunny rambling. Not random rambling. Quite the contrary, it's structured and historic and what not. It's not interesting though. -RAHB 00:49, 22 November 2007 (UTC)
|
VFH
← Back to summary VFH
← Back to full VFH
Always check the feature queue first.
Note: the queue slot won't be properly filled until the {{FA}} code (with correct date) is on the article.Just follow the instructions if you're unsure.
