Uncyclopedia:FFS: Difference between revisions

From Uncyclopedia, the content-free encyclopedia
Jump to navigation Jump to search
imported>Col.swordman
imported>Col.swordman
Line 115: Line 115:
   
 
==[[User:Col.swordman|Col.swordman]]==
 
==[[User:Col.swordman|Col.swordman]]==
{{s|+8}}
+
{{s|+9}}
 
*'''Nom and for''' - for:
 
*'''Nom and for''' - for:
 
**being an arrogant jerk.
 
**being an arrogant jerk.

Revision as of 06:23, 9 October 2006

Vote to ban users

  • Sign below a user you find abhorrent. Please add new nominations on the top.
    • Initial nominations do not count as a vote For. Please use "Nomination and For" or some iteration thereof if you wish to vote for your nomination.
    • IP votes carry half the weight of registered votes.
    • Unsigned votes and votes without timestamps will be struck out, so make sure you sign your votes with ~~~~ or press the "your signature with timestamp" button (Button sig.png) above the edit box.
    • You may nominate and vote for yourself if you so choose, but to do so would be absurdist and attention-seeking.
    • When nominating a user, the template Template:FFS should be added to the userpage of the user you are nominating to be banned {{FFS}}. Anything you add {{FFS}} to also shows up in Category:ban_nomination.
  • Failed FFS nominations should only be archived/removed by the sysops who pay attention to this sort of thing.
  • Previous bans can be found on the archive pages.
THIS IS A DISCUSSION PAGE.

If you feel the need to whine or start flamewars please do it HERE. Violators of this policy will be BUMMED.

Survivors will be GIVEN INTRAVENOUS KETAMINE.
Then we bum them again.

Current Nominations (new stuff at top, prefix votes with * )

SELF-NOMINATION REGULATION: self-nominated users (i.e. you hate yourself and your writings and have decided to prostrate yourself amongst your unhinged peers) must be at least a week old before nomination. Any user under one week old who can type may not self-nominate. Users nominated by people other than themselves can still be nominated at any time.

ADMIN LOOPHOLE: Admins may not be nominated for banning. BECAUSE THEY CAN JUST UNBAN THEMSELVES, and because THIS IS A FASCIST OLIGARCHICAL SECT NOT A SOCIALIST MERITOCTRACY.

Ghelæ

Score: +7
  • Nom ænd For deserves every second of banning hæ gets. Doesn't know what "FFS" stands for. ~ Ghelæ talkcontribs 17:43, 14 August 2006 (UTC)
  • For Whines as much as a Democratic Liberal & shats himself.--User:Tom mayfair/Sig 03:59, 17 August 2006 (UTC)
  • Frop. Hæy, you wænt mæ bænnæd?.. I'm tæking you with mæ. -- Imrælizæd æææææ! 00:59, 18 August 2006 (UTC)
  • For-- infinite ban for abuse of mod powers, intolerance, and lack of humor or insight--Countjulian 21:54, 27 August 2006 (UTC)
  • For. Hasn't made it easy enough for people to steal his sig.--Wit (tawk) 07:11, 18 September 2006 (UTC)
  • For Because he wants it!-- Sir Severian Severian1.jpg CUN.png (Sprich mit mir!) Kraut.png 19:54, 28 September 2006 (UTC)
  • For per Severian. Mr. Predictable 14:10, 30 September 2006 (UTC)

Tom mayfair

Score: +4
  • Agree He's a Communist and he's not funny but his mother thinks he is.! User:Tom mayfair/Sig 07:20, 12 August 2006 (UTC)
  • For can't even make the first letter of his surname a capital. Tut, tut, tut. ~ Ghelæ talkcontribs 17:53, 14 August 2006 (UTC)
  • For Infinite Ban.--Jtaylor1Small Egg.png 09:41, 16 August 2006 (UTC)
  • BAN. That's what FFS is all about. -- The Colonel (talk) 13:51, 4 September 2006 (UTC)

Jack mort

Score: +0
  • For creating this, redundant to Uncyclopedia:Ban Patrol. For copying {{VFH}} to {{FFS}} without removing the stupid bits. For being Jack mort. --Splaka 22:12, 7 June 2006 (UTC)
  • Agree. --~ sin($) tan() 22:14, 7 June 2006 (UTC)
  • Against. Jack is a cornerstone of the uncyc world. - jack mort | cunt | talkKodamaIcon.jpg - 22:33, 7 June 2006 (UTC)
  • Against. I don't believe he's done enough to deserve this yet. Must try harder. -- Sir Mhaille Icons-flag-gb.png (talk to me) 13:32, 10 June 2006 (UTC)
  • Hamster The world will end if JackMort is banned. Do it! Sliferjam 23:43, 17 June 2006 (UTC)
  • For He recently did something to one of my articles, can't remember what though. --Mr Gridenko 11:59, 23 June 2006 (UTC)
  • No, that was me. And I NRV'd it. At least I think it was yours. Anyway, PWN INDEFINATELY. ~ Ghelæ talkcontribs 15:56, 23 June 2006 (UTC)
  • Nay Seems like an OK dude, on IRC at least. Tux.png DaBlade Kmenu.png (Click here to bitch. :)) 20:47, 24 June 2006 (UTC)
  • Against, cause he's cool.--TKF 22:20, 7 July 2006 (UTC)
  • Nay seems to be a good enough bloke. --§ǚρωξλ£μĦΦφƏΣßÐÆØΞΩųTalk%C2%A7.gifMini%C2%A7.gif 04:26, 24 July 2006 (UTC)

Mhaille

Score: -3
  • For BAN BAN BAN, SHAME HE'S AN ADMIN! --

This user has been promoted to the rank of Queen's Reader.
Due to their site-topping talents in reading, all other chores formerly assigned to them have been rescinded. Unlike other ranks, this one is for life, and they will not be returning to their former tasks anytime soon. If you were hoping they would reply to a message, sorry to disappoint, but such a menial task is currently outside their job description.



Sockpuppeteer of the Month Award Sockpuppeteer of the Month May 2007

12:24 1 october 2006 (UTC)

  • For banning him before he became an admin. --KATIE!! 19:51, 7 June 2006 (UTC)
  • For. much too northern and a golfer - jack mort | cunt | talkKodamaIcon.jpg - 22:33, 7 June 2006 (UTC)
  • Against. Banning Mhaille? No way. It would be like... turning over a stone and not finding a centipede there. --Suresh simple.png Swami A. Suresh 12:17, 10 June 2006 (UTC)
  • Strong Against. That is Bat Fuck Insane. Banning Mhaille is like banning homosexuality from construction. It just can't be done.--Emmzee 02:18, 13 June 2006 (UTC)
  • Strong For. - Unless this actually is for real, in which case I'm actually Against --Olipro Icons-flag-gb.png Anchor CUN (Harass) 00:53, 18 June 2006 (UTC)
  • It's Peanut butter jelly time! Talk to the burrito. Sliferjam - #1UN - You got something to say? - JAM! - I'm special. 14:47, 27 June 2006 (UTC)
  • Nay See my comment on JackMort ^. Tux.png DaBlade Kmenu.png (Click here to bitch. :)) 20:47, 24 June 2006 (UTC)
  • BLOCK INDEFINATELY. ~ Ghelæ talkcontribs 15:58, 23 June 2006 (UTC)
  • Against. He gave me my first award. --Sbluen 01:31, 29 June 2006 (UTC)
  • Against He's done quite a lot for the good of Uncyc, at least more than I. Also, he's part of my inner circle; I cannot bear to see a Brother banned. What did he do that's so bad in the first place? --Señor DiZtheGreat Honor me! CUN AOTM ( Worship me!) (Praise me!) (Join me!) AMEN! 18:25, 5 July 2006 (UTC)
  • Ban Him but only cause he can unban himself, making banning him a useless joke. --The Zombiebaron 01:44, 7 July 2006 (UTC)
  • Against He's been nothing but funny! --PiOfFive 20:20, 11 September 2006 (UTC)
  • Strong Against - He's a helpful person. I like him. I don't see why he should be banned --Micoolio101 03:16, 28 September 2006 (UTC)Micoolio101

Sliferjam

Score: +1
  • You want to do what to my ass?!?
  • For How dare he! If I was him, I would kill myself! Ban him! Oh, wait. That's me! AGAINST, AGAINST! Sliferjam 14:32, 20 June 2006 (UTC)
  • For - he made a kitten cry. - jack mort | cunt | talkKodamaIcon.jpg - 23:27, 21 June 2006 (UTC)
  • BAN INDEFINATELY. Ok, maybe that was a bit excessive. ~ Ghelæ talkcontribs 15:55, 23 June 2006 (UTC)
  • Against. He's not so bad once you get to know him... --Icons-flag-us.png SonicChao Babbel!Contribs 20:33, 24 June 2006 (UTC)
  • Nay - What SonicChao said. Tux.png DaBlade Kmenu.png (Click here to bitch. :)) 20:44, 24 June 2006 (UTC)
  • Against I thought the impersonation votes were actually kinda funny... --SubPOP talk F@H 13:30, 27 June 2006 (UTC)
  • What?! No way!! He's nice, if mad. Mind you, I can't talk. Anyway, the fake votes were funny.
    ﺹﺻﺽﻂ
  • For Ban the boy--TKF 18:07, 28 June 2006 (UTC)
    • Actually, I withdraw my vote for a more ban-able candidate--TKF 18:05, 26 August 2006 (UTC)
  • For He's like poison to the machine. Making fake votes isn't funny, just disruptive and undemocratic. --Señor DiZtheGreat Honor me! CUN AOTM ( Worship me!) (Praise me!) (Join me!) AMEN! 18:31, 5 July 2006 (UTC)
  • For cause he's whoring himself out to win UGotM. --The Zombiebaron 01:45, 7 July 2006 (UTC)

Spang

Score: -3
  • Nom and for AGAINST - You are no commander, you are a threat to the mission! Your methods are stupid, your intellegence is stupid, your progress has been STUPID! For the sake of the mission, you must be terminated! (A quick reminder, I am exercising my freedom of speech by doing this on my home computer and thusly can NOT be punished for my opinion. If punished, you WILL be sued.) - Sliferjam - #1UN - You got something to say? - JAM! - I'm special. 23:54, 1 July 2006 (UTC)
Comment: Oh yeah? I'm going to hunt you down and forcibly remove that opinion from you. Freedom of speech my ass! Spang talk 03:05, 5 July 2006 (UTC)
You will pay for your questions! - Jack Mort | TALK | MUN | F@H - 22:00, 7 July 2006 (UTC)
  • For banning, even though he cai  ^n unpwn himself too easily.
  • Against. He's okay for a bastard.--User:Tom mayfair/Sig 06:51, 28 August 2006 (UTC)

Zombiebaron

Score: +1
  • Nom and for, because he's an undead nay-saying ginger-loving canadian. - Jack Mort | TALK | MUN | F@H - 22:03, 7 July 2006 (UTC)
  • Against. He already is a useless gobshite and he was banned by Splaka. He doesn't need another ban or useless award. --Sbluen 00:55, 9 July 2006 (UTC)
Acctually I've been banned more then just that once, sept those times I was banned because of someone else's wrong doing (or cause Money don't like edit collisions). --The Zombiebaron 22:50, 10 July 2006 (UTC)
Hmmm...it seems that someone takes votes a little bit too personally? --The Zombiebaron 23:31, 28 August 2006 (UTC)
Ha! --Spacer.gifSpacer.gifPremierTomMayfairChe.png RedPhone.png Unsoc.png Hammer and sickle.png 15:28, 5 September 2006 (UTC)

Col.swordman

Score: +9
  • Nom and for - for:
    • being an arrogant jerk.
    • starting a nosensical flamewar in a nonsensical forum.
    • making aggressive bullet points like this.
    • vandalising recreated vanity.
    • vandalising Sandbox.
    • hating nerds and geeks. (These people are good-looking, humourous, stylish pVVnin9 13375. Stop hating them n00b! lololololol!!!111111ONE1111ELEVEN11)
-- The Colonel (talk) 22:03, 7 July 2006 (UTC)
  • For Screw sympathy votes! ~ T. (talk) 00:55, 9 July 2006 (UTC)
  • For infinite ban! __ ~ HOMESTAR ME!!! TURTLE ME!!! t o m p k i n s  blah. ﺞوﻦ וףה ՃՄ ண்ஸ ފއހ วอฏม +տ trade websites 22:48, 10 July 2006 (UTC)
  • For. Up yours, punk! ~ Sir Mhaille Icons-flag-gb.png (talk to me) 22:49, 10 July 2006 (UTC)
  • For Go to Hades! - Imrealized 23:06, 10 July 2006 (UTC)
  • FOR KEEP BENSON!! KEEP WORSHIPPING HIS EXCELLENCE FOR AT LEAST ONE WHOLE FRIGGIN' YEAR!!! ~ User:Nintendorulez 08:44, 11 July 2006 (UTC)
  • Stab it with a stealy knife --The Zombiebaron 14:51, 11 July 2006 (UTC)
  • For. Sir C America...Fuck Yeah!!!! Holla | CUN --20:33, 11 July 2006 (UTC)
  • Against. DNFtT. --The King In Yellow (Talk to the Dalek.) 19:52, 14 July 2006 (UTC)
  • Against. I need an archrival, and this guy seems to be the one. Crazyswordsman 17:32, 15 July 2006 (UTC)
  • Against. If my vote counts, and there's not some rule against my voting, I don't see anything that he's done that other people here haven't done already.. --Joe!/TALK/CONTRIBS/F@H 21:19, 15 July 2006 (UTC)
  • Against. death to benson, long live the colonel! - Jack Mort | TALK | MUN | F@H - 19:28, 20 July 2006 (UTC)
  • Hell no! He keeps me honest.--Procopius 13:36, 27 July 2006 (UTC)
  • For annoys me by being human. ~ Ghelæ talkcontribs 17:51, 14 August 2006 (UTC)
  • For. Infinite ban for being an arrogant, unfunny asshole.--TKF 18:08, 26 August 2006 (UTC)
  • For infinite ban for being intolerant, arrogant, unfunny, and most of all taking the internets(and especially uncyclopedia) way too seriously--Countjulian 19:42, 27 August 2006 (UTC)
  • For. I'm God. You are not. -- Bone F clear.png Sir Famine, Gun Petition » 01:34, 1 September 2006 (UTC)
  • For. Touché. --Spacer.gifSpacer.gifPremierTomMayfairChe.png RedPhone.png Unsoc.png Hammer and sickle.png 15:09, 5 September 2006 (UTC)
  • For. Banning him would be a fair punishment for being an arrogant, unfunny asshole. --General Insineratehymn 20:58, 5 September 2006 (UTC)
  • Against. I'm not really in a position to comment, of course, but on the face of it he seems like a nice guy. --Flyingfeline 09:52, 30 September 2006 (UTC)
  • Self-defeating emo vote-rigging for. Yeah, bite me. -- The Colonel (talk) 06:49, 4 October 2006 (UTC)
  • Ban!: This is an arduous, dangerous, deep, difficult, far-reaching, fateful, formidable, grave, grievous, grim, hard, heavy, important, laborious, major, meaningful, menacing, momentous, operose, pressing, severe, significant, sobering, strenuous, threatening, tough, ugly, unamusing, unhumorous, urgent, weighty and pointless vote for this complete moron. -- The Colonel (talk) --Sir Hardwick Fundlebuggy - (Ring for service) 05:46, 9 October 2006 (UTC)

Imrealized

Score: +7
  • Nom and HUGE FOR - No real reason, but if you want one I'll say I don't like his jerkoff name, I don't like his jerkoff face, I don't like his jerkoff behavior and I don't like 'im. Jerkoff. -- User:Malibu Chief of Police 04:24, 17 August 2006 (UTC)
  • Ja. But I just want the money. -- Uli Kunkel 04:24, 17 August 2006 (UTC)
  • Little Shit! - Do you see what happens when you fuck a stranger's article in the ass? Do you?? -- 216.195.219.50 04:24, 17 August 2006 (UTC)
  • WTF? Would you all just chill out, man? -- Imrealized ...hmm? 04:24, 17 August 2006 (UTC)
  • For, why not? ~ Ghelæ talkcontribs 09:31, 17 August 2006 (UTC)
  • Conditional for: only if he's opped first so he can unban himself. Spang talk 09:34, 17 August 2006 (UTC)
  • BAN. It's like Lenin said... -- Walter S. 00:59, 18 August 2006 (UTC)
Comment - I am the walrus. -- Donnie the Strike King 00:59, 18 August 2006 (UTC)
  • Ban him so he won't touch himself ever again. -- The Colonel (talk) 13:17, 22 August 2006 (UTC)