User talk:SteveSims

Quote on Uncyclopedia article

Please stop adding this every time you come back to the site. It was deleted for a reason. Thanks. -- (but) Untrue  Whhhy?Whut?How? *Back from the dead* 23:31, 25 February 2007 (UTC)

Double redirect?

That's not a double redirect I see with your name on it, is it? --Andorin Kato 05:05, 24 May 2007 (UTC)

This page does not exist

I saw what you did. It's funny, but has to be removed. That page is supposed to be blank, because it's linked to when a red link is needed (see Bible). --EMC ^[TALK] 22:59, 26 May 2007 (UTC)

Play Second Life

I play quite a lot actually. I spent about 90% of my time in sandboxes trying to build crap I just can't get to work. I still don't find it -that- funny, I don't mind having the Batman thing in the article, but having plastered over parts that I wanna read is just dumb. If you could put an explanation along with it (a comedy one, obviously) it would make more sense.

Anyway, peace out! sleepygamer 05:08, 30 July 2007 (UTC)

What is this, The middle ages?

Stop reverting the picture to the "Tiger" version, Can't you see that "Leopard" is the future of Mac OS X, Also it looks better, feels better and is fimiliar to that old "Tiger" picture. --NXWave 11:52, 7 October 2007 (UTC)

Wikimedia Donate Ad.gif

Did you know that a parody of the Wikimedia Donate Ad is already on the top. Yeah, Look up there next time before placing that ad again in Template:Ad Thank you!. --NXWave 00:45, 24 November 2007 (UTC)

Um, WHAT THE HELL ARE YOU DOING?

Regarding this edit [1]? I'm going to assume this was a mistake made in good faith, but PLEASE try to be more careful in future when voting on VFD. Thank you. MrN 18:20, Mar 8

Hea, Me again

In a less aggressive mood this time. Sorry about all that, but VFD is kind important, and people can get a bit uptight about it...

Regarding your vote at [2]. Surprised me a little. I see that you have been around a while, so I will not try to tell you what to do, but I just wanted to voice an opinion... As you say, this article is an important tittle, and we defiantly need an article on this. Do you really think that this article is a good starting point for this however? As articles go, I would say that this is one of the more poor which we have, and feel that sometimes it's actually better to delete an article so that it can be started again. I'm not suggesting we don't have an article about this, just that this article is so far from what we want, it might be best to have nothing. If we did not have an article on this I feel that it would actually be much more likely that someone would create this again, hopefully next time as a much better version... Just an opinion, I don't know if you care to comment on my views?

Also. Could you please remove your Poopsmith template from your user page. Although I see that you have changed it slightly I'm not sure it's a good idea for you to have it there as it could be miss-interpreted by some who saw it. I have this page watched if you want to reply here. Thanks. MrN 21:32, Mar 8

The tag is removed. If it comes back, you will get an official ban warning, Steve. -- The Zombiebaron 00:15, 9 March 2008 (UTC)

Rev. Wright Quote

Your Rev. Wright quote on my "Just Say No" page doesn't quite "feel" right. But I do appreciate you taking time to contribute to the page so I'll let you make a case for it before I revert it. --Naughtius Maximus F@H Woof! MeowMUN 23:04, 15 May 2008 (UTC)

Chav

You know that Chav picture you added? I use it as a troll account on facebook :D Do you know the name of the guy in it? I wanna add him lmao :D – Preceding unsigned comment added by 212.219.108.9 (talk • contribs)