User talk:Guildensternenstein/Der Unwehr/Tab

PWNED!!!!!!!! Don Puttano cHeDDs 01:10,19May,2009

5 Points? That's humble. Don Puttano cHeDDs 23:07,19May,2009

Are these for real? Come on, people, let's actually do some work. • • • Necropaxx (T) {~} 15:39, May 20

I resent that. This is work. Well, the templates are. The grammar mistake deserved a point because it was at the beginning of the page and caused some weird placement problems. The templates are, well, templates. They help make the page more official-esque. Don Puttano cHeDDs 19:25,20May,2009

These are ridiculous. I thought Unwehr was about rewriting articles, not creating templates or fixing grammar. We have other usergroups for that. Guildy, Multi, Orian, myself, and Todd are the only ones who have actually written or rewritten something, but I see that Cheddar, Silly Angel, and Multi again have all given themselves ridiculous amounts of points for trivial things like templates. The portals look nice, and should be worth some points, but not five each. That's too much. I would very much like to see the points reapportioned and more focus placed on rewriting or writing articles, which is why Der Unwehr was started in the first place. • • • Necropaxx (T) {~} 15:28, May 29

I talked to Guildy about that. He doubled the points for articles. And he gives the special points, not us. If I was giving the points to myself I'd have 52359 right now. Also, I agree that 5 per portal is a bit much. Don Puttano cHeDDs 19:13,29May,2009

Then I'll talk to Guildy. • • • Necropaxx (T) {~} 23:43, May 29

I answered Necropaxx's question on his talk page. Keep in mind that the 5 Points for portals is a cover-all for creating, running, and maintaining them forever. That's not only work, but a long-term commitment. I think 5 Points is appropriate, esspecially considering I recently upped the points for articles per Cheddar's suggestion. —Unführer Guildy Ritter von Guildensternenstein 03:09, 30 May 2009 (UTC)

Okay. Don Puttano cHeDDs 12:50,30May,2009