User:Cajek/Archive21
Jump to navigation
Jump to search
 | This page is an archive. The contents have been moved from another page for reference purposes only, and should be preserved in their current form. Discussion or voting on this page is not current. Any additions you make will probably not be read. The current version of this page can be found at User:Cajek/Pee. |
Uncyclopedia:Pee Review/Godwin's Law's Law by Why?Yeah. --ChiefjusticeDS 19:52, January 1, 2010 (UTC)Uncyclopedia:Pee Review/Mothers Against Noise (2nd review) by Chief.Self-yes. (Override)--ChiefjusticeDS 23:03, December 29, 2009 (UTC)Uncyclopedia:Pee Review/That Fidgety Weird Kid Who Sits Behind You In Third Period by UU.But of course. --ChiefjusticeDS 22:55, December 29, 2009 (UTC)Uncyclopedia:Pee Review/Kreator by POTRYes, all things considered there is plenty there. --ChiefjusticeDS 22:50, December 29, 2009 (UTC)Uncyclopedia:Pee Review/Polish language by Hiatus Hernia.Yes! --ChiefjusticeDS 22:46, December 29, 2009 (UTC)Uncyclopedia:Pee Review/Hanna Barbera's "Gangs of New York" by Matfen815.Yes, could do with more on humour though. One more like that and I go asking. --ChiefjusticeDS 22:42, December 29, 2009 (UTC)Uncyclopedia:Pee Review/HowTo:Be a Good Catholic by Rogpyvbc.Absolutely, good work. --ChiefjusticeDS 22:36, December 29, 2009 (UTC)Uncyclopedia:Pee Review/Why?: Not fly Air Zimbabwe? by Ptok-Bentoniczny.Nope. --ChiefjusticeDS 22:28, December 29, 2009 (UTC)Uncyclopedia:Pee Review/Caboose (Red vs. Blue) by Ptok-Bentoniczny.No, a word has been had. --ChiefjusticeDS 21:49, December 24, 2009 (UTC)Uncyclopedia:Pee Review/Monitor by Ptok-Bentoniczny.No. --ChiefjusticeDS 21:49, December 24, 2009 (UTC)Uncyclopedia:Pee Review/Worst Article Ever (2nd Review) by Ptok-Bentoniczny.No. --ChiefjusticeDS 21:49, December 24, 2009 (UTC)Uncyclopedia:Pee Review/Pittsburg Penguins by Ptok-Bentoniczny.No.--ChiefjusticeDS 21:49, December 24, 2009 (UTC)Uncyclopedia:Pee Review/Zombie Reagan by Ptok-Bentoniczny.No. --ChiefjusticeDS 21:49, December 24, 2009 (UTC)Uncyclopedia:Pee Review/Inverted Godwin's Law by Ptok-Bentoniczny.No. --ChiefjusticeDS 21:49, December 24, 2009 (UTC)Uncyclopedia:Pee Review/Rwanda by Ptok-Bentoniczny.No. --ChiefjusticeDS 21:49, December 24, 2009 (UTC)Uncyclopedia:Pee Review/Chicago Bears by Ptok-Bentoniczny.No. --ChiefjusticeDS 21:49, December 24, 2009 (UTC)Uncyclopedia:Pee Review/Giant panda by Chief.Self-yes. (Override) --ChiefjusticeDS 21:54, December 24, 2009 (UTC)Uncyclopedia:Pee Review/Red vs. Blue by Iwillkillyou333.Almost, a similar commitment to that seen in humour would get you to Yes. --ChiefjusticeDS 20:59, December 24, 2009 (UTC)Uncyclopedia:Pee Review/User:PuppyOnTheRadio/Sandbox by Matfen815.Yes indeed. --ChiefjusticeDS 20:53, December 24, 2009 (UTC)Uncyclopedia:Pee Review/Command & Conquer 4: Tiberian Twilight by POTR.Yup. --ChiefjusticeDS 20:46, December 24, 2009 (UTC)Uncyclopedia:Pee Review/Forest Whitaker's Lazy Eye (second review) by Chief.Self-yes. (Override) --ChiefjusticeDS 23:47, December 21, 2009 (UTC)Uncyclopedia:Pee Review/UnNews:Girl, 10, who recieved hippopotamus for Christmas, stomped to death by Iwillkillyou333.No. I realise the difficulty in reviewing an article that you personally really enjoy, but try to be critical and give some suggestions back to the writer along with the praise. --ChiefjusticeDS 23:43, December 21, 2009 (UTC)Uncyclopedia:Pee Review/Angry Dude by Iwillkillyou333.Borderline yes, you make some good points, a bit more depth would be desirable though. --ChiefjusticeDS 23:43, December 21, 2009 (UTC)Uncyclopedia:Pee Review/User:Colin "All your base" Heaney/dicks lol by POTR & The Woodburninator.Yes to both of you, considering what you had to work with those were OK. --ChiefjusticeDS 23:36, December 21, 2009 (UTC)Uncyclopedia:Pee Review/Classical Satire by POTR.NoYes. Though I would rather not see too many more in this vein. (Override) --ChiefjusticeDS 23:03, December 21, 2009 (UTC)Uncyclopedia:Pee Review/Idiocracy by Killer 3.14.No, read and learn this. --ChiefjusticeDS 22:50, December 21, 2009 (UTC)Uncyclopedia:Pee Review/Surgeon General's Warning by Chief.Self-yes. (Override)--ChiefjusticeDS 00:16, December 20, 2009 (UTC)Uncyclopedia:Pee Review/The Covenant (Halo) by Matfen815.Yes, good work. --ChiefjusticeDS 23:54, December 19, 2009 (UTC)Uncyclopedia:Pee Review/Ed Gein by Hiatus Hernia.Ja. --ChiefjusticeDS 00:11, December 20, 2009 (UTC)Uncyclopedia:Pee Review/History of the papyrus containing the spell to. . . . by Necropaxx.Yes. --ChiefjusticeDS 00:01, December 20, 2009 (UTC)Uncyclopedia:Pee Review/Michael Biehn by Why?Yes, unsurprisingly. --ChiefjusticeDS 00:05, December 20, 2009 (UTC)Uncyclopedia:Pee Review/powerthirst by Matfen815.Borderline yes, again, quite harsh, but for a third review it is OK. --ChiefjusticeDS 23:54, December 19, 2009 (UTC)Uncyclopedia:Pee Review/Phil Hartman by Matfen815.Yes, a bit harsh, but some good points too. --ChiefjusticeDS 23:54, December 19, 2009 (UTC)Uncyclopedia:Pee Review/User:YouKnowWhatTheMusicMeans/FACT CHECK: Birthday Card not as Accurate as Hoped by Chief.Self-yes. (Override) --ChiefjusticeDS 23:18, December 16, 2009 (UTC)Uncyclopedia:Pee Review/Martin Luther King Jr. (rw) by Hiatus Hernia.Yes. A couple more like that and I go asking. --ChiefjusticeDS 23:13, December 16, 2009 (UTC)Uncyclopedia:Pee Review/Mermaids by Rogpyvbc.Definitely, much better. --ChiefjusticeDS 23:07, December 16, 2009 (UTC)Uncyclopedia:Pee Review/Bob the sperm by Chief.Self-yes. (Override)--ChiefjusticeDS 23:49, December 12, 2009 (UTC)Uncyclopedia:Pee Review/HowTo:Write Colin Meloy Lyrics (2nd review) by Why?Yarp. --ChiefjusticeDS 23:43, December 12, 2009 (UTC)Uncyclopedia:Pee Review/UnScripts:Officers and Espionage by Why?Yup. --ChiefjusticeDS 22:30, December 10, 2009 (UTC)Uncyclopedia:Pee Review/4chan (exposed) by Hiatus Hernia.Yes, try to be a bit more diplomatic with the criticism though. --ChiefjusticeDS 23:03, December 7, 2009 (UTC)Uncyclopedia:Pee Review/UnBooks: My unusual relationship with a volley ball by the name of Wilson (2) by Chief.Self-yes. (Override) --ChiefjusticeDS 13:13, December 7, 2009 (UTC)Uncyclopedia:Pee Review/UnNews:FACT CHECK: Birthday Card not as Accurate as Hoped by Count of Monkey Crisco.Nope, not enough there. --ChiefjusticeDS 13:07, December 7, 2009 (UTC)Uncyclopedia:Pee Review/Holocaust film by Multiliteralist.Close one, but for a first it's OK. --ChiefjusticeDS 13:03, December 7, 2009 (UTC)Uncyclopedia:Pee Review/Next Year's Australian Grand Prix by RGC.Afraid not, give advice not just criticism. --ChiefjusticeDS 12:58, December 7, 2009 (UTC)Uncyclopedia:Pee Review/Matter by Chief.Self-yes. (Override) --ChiefjusticeDS 21:38, December 4, 2009 (UTC)Uncyclopedia:Pee Review/Rock and roll by Why?Aye. --ChiefjusticeDS 21:30, December 4, 2009 (UTC)Uncyclopedia:Pee Review/User:Staircase/Running a Red Light by Chief.Self-yes. (Override) --ChiefjusticeDS 22:28, December 3, 2009 (UTC)Uncyclopedia:Pee Review/I will never forget by Chief.Self-yup. (Override) --ChiefjusticeDS 11:17, December 3, 2009 (UTC)Uncyclopedia:Pee Review/Night by POTR.Yes indeed. --ChiefjusticeDS 09:35, December 3, 2009 (UTC)Uncyclopedia:Pee Review/Los Angeles Kings NHL by Rogpyvbc.Nope, Why? has already had a word on that.Uncyclopedia:Pee Review/Star Trek: The Next Generation (2nd Review) by Why?Wow, definitely. --ChiefjusticeDS 00:21, December 3, 2009 (UTC)Uncyclopedia:Pee Review/Thinking outside the box by SuperBario.Borderline Yes. A harsh score in my opinion, but you try to help, and it's an improvement on your first review. --ChiefjusticeDS 22:33, December 2, 2009 (UTC)Uncyclopedia:Pee Review/Various Fatal Syndromes by Chief.Self-Yeah. (Override) --ChiefjusticeDS 22:18, December 2, 2009 (UTC)Uncyclopedia:Pee Review/Statutory rape by Why?Ja. --ChiefjusticeDS 22:48, December 1, 2009 (UTC)Uncyclopedia:Pee Review/Marty McFly by Chief.I'd say so. (Override) --ChiefjusticeDS 21:51, December 1, 2009 (UTC)Uncyclopedia:Pee Review/Boston Bruins by GlobalTourniquet.Yah. --ChiefjusticeDS 09:35, December 1, 2009 (UTC)