Uncyclopedia talk:Top 10 Articles of 2006

From Uncyclopedia, the content-free encyclopedia
Jump to navigation Jump to search
StatlerAndWaldorf.jpg

Sigh[edit source]

Always a bridesmaid, never a bride. And why is it exactly that my most popular (runner-up) articles are (at least in my own opinion), some of my worst? I can only speak for the reception my own material, but . And Horton, why have you forsaken me?  :) --Sir Todd GUN WotM MI UotM NotM MDA VFH AotM Bur. AlBur. CM NS PC (talk) 00:33, 16 January 2007 (UTC)

I agree. This list is bullshit. -- Tinymooose.gif » Sir Savethemooses Grand Commanding Officer ... holla atcha boy» 05:17, 16 January 2007 (UTC)
So, which one of you is Waldorf?--Sir Modusoperandi Boinc! 05:52, 16 January 2007 (UTC)

Hold on a minute. Gettysburg only had 13 votes, and Todd's had 17.5! How come Gettysburg made the top 10? --Wehpudicontok--Welcome to Vaporstory! 05:59, 16 January 2007 (UTC)

I believe Brad had to adjust the scores because of sockpuppetry concerns. —rc (t) 06:06, 16 January 2007 (UTC)
That explains Coffee not being on the list. Eh, not my best work, I don't care. -- §. | WotM | PLS | T | C | A 06:39, 17 January 2007 (UTC)
  • Best article I can think of was gazebo. Brilliant. That's all --Dagibit 01:15, 21 January 2007 (UTC)
  • You'll get no sighing from me. My rewrite of Calvin & Hobbes was numero 5 and I wholeheartedly agree that I am hilarious. --Nakedman 15:43, 21 January 2007 (UTC)
  • Ugh... Captain Obvious. Cream of the Crap? More like... Crap of the Cream. Just imagine - you're eating delicious whipped cream, when all of the sudden, an icky turd squeezes out of the bottle into your mouth. That's what Captain Obvious is, in my eyes. -- §. | WotM | PLS | T | C | A 06:17, 25 January 2007 (UTC)
  • Agreed. Calvin and Hobbes should have gotten the nod, in my opinion, and I think Captain Obvious doesn't deserve to be anywhere near this list. No offense to the author(s), whoever you are. —rc (t) 06:25, 25 January 2007 (UTC)
  • Still I should point out that this year's list has more actual content than last year's. It only has one article based around a gimmick, and even that one has content that fleshes out the gimmick. —rc (t) 06:27, 25 January 2007 (UTC)
  • True, although captain obvious is a huge list of quotes, which I thought was anathema. Fisher Price: A Retrospective was brilliant. --GeorgeRI.jpg» His Majesty King George VI (the boxes) Spacer.gifSpacer.gifSpacer.gifSpacer.gifSpacer.gifSpacer.gifIcons-flag-gb.png 30px-Coatsmxa.pngSpacer.gifSpacer.gifSpacer.gifIcons-flag-us.pngSpacer.gifSpacer.gifSpacer.gif 07:08, 25 January 2007 (UTC)
  • The French Revolution should have been on this list. That is by far the funniest article I've ever read here on Uncyclopedia. It is the perfect parody. That is how an Uncyclopedia article should be written. --User:The Ice Cream Man 07:45, 25 January 2007 (UTC)
  • Hopefully, our monthly "narrowing-down" sessions will give us a better list to choose from at the end of the year, so gems like that won't get lost in the mix next time.--<<Bradmonogram.png>> 04:19, 27 January 2007 (UTC)
  • Heh... I wrote that. The praise is all I need, I don't need a "list" to tell me how wicked cool I am. Thanks :) -- §. | WotM | PLS | T | C | A 00:38, 29 January 2007 (UTC)