Uncyclopedia talk:At A Glance
I like this page. Should find more things to add to it and put it somewhere proper. And maybe link it from somewhere. • Spang • ☃ • talk • 19:18, 10 Apr 2008
Skullthumper this is awesome! why isn't this on mainspace? • <Apr 10, 2008 [20:58]>
NO IT IS TEH SUCX[edit source]
ya u herd me
Dear Spang,[edit source]
Yeah, go for it. </lazy> – Sir Skullthumper, MD (criticize • writings • critchat) 02:57 Apr 14, 2008
- didnt u here it suc
Seriously, though[edit source]
I know I'm a dick for asking you to do this, but is there any way to not include:
- Talk pages that have just been created (that is, welcomed), so it's less clogged with that Welcome Crew (whores)
- Cajek's talk page, because it eclipses mine?~~ Sir Ljlego, GUN [talk] 00:28, 16 April 2008 (UTC)
- No. – Sir Skullthumper, MD (criticize • writings • critchat) 00:29 Apr 16, 2008
- Thank you.~~ Sir Ljlego, GUN [talk] 01:19, 16 April 2008 (UTC)
- You're welcome. Unfortunately, you seem to have fallen under the illusion that I am smart and that I know how to work these things. Do not be disillusioned, my friend; I have no fucking idea what I'm doing. – Sir Skullthumper, MD (criticize • writings • critchat) 01:23 Apr 16, 2008
- This is why you fit in. Sir Modusoperandi Boinc! 01:24, 16 April 2008 (UTC)
- Some sites are built from pure HTML, others from layouts; some are complex in their design, others are formed from simple but elegant coding; Uncyclopedia is one hack on top of another hack on top of another hack with Spang trying to hold it steady so nobody notices. – Sir Skullthumper, MD (criticize • writings • critchat) 01:28 Apr 16, 2008
- I resent that. The word "hack" implies that I have NO talent, whereas my mommy clearly tells me I have some excellent talents.~~ Sir Ljlego, GUN [talk] 01:54, 16 April 2008 (UTC)
- Surely the talents that your mother is talking about aren't the talents that I know about...right? -- The Zombiebaron 01:59, 16 April 2008 (UTC)
- I resent that. The word "hack" implies that I have NO talent, whereas my mommy clearly tells me I have some excellent talents.~~ Sir Ljlego, GUN [talk] 01:54, 16 April 2008 (UTC)
- Some sites are built from pure HTML, others from layouts; some are complex in their design, others are formed from simple but elegant coding; Uncyclopedia is one hack on top of another hack on top of another hack with Spang trying to hold it steady so nobody notices. – Sir Skullthumper, MD (criticize • writings • critchat) 01:28 Apr 16, 2008
- This is why you fit in. Sir Modusoperandi Boinc! 01:24, 16 April 2008 (UTC)
- You're welcome. Unfortunately, you seem to have fallen under the illusion that I am smart and that I know how to work these things. Do not be disillusioned, my friend; I have no fucking idea what I'm doing. – Sir Skullthumper, MD (criticize • writings • critchat) 01:23 Apr 16, 2008
- Thank you.~~ Sir Ljlego, GUN [talk] 01:19, 16 April 2008 (UTC)
- Several years later, the answer is yes! – Sir Skullthumper, MD (criticize • writings • critchat) 01:29 Mar 18, 2011
Images?[edit source]
This page doesn't link to VFP even once. Would it be possible to add a "What images are being voted on" section? Thanks. -- The Zombiebaron 21:47, March 12, 2011 (UTC)
Boob-count issue[edit source]
It appears that this page is measuring the number of boobage by items in Category:Boobage. However, do to my moving stuff around, the number of images of boobs is better approximated by the number of items in Category:Boobage Images CA --Mn-z 20:28, March 21, 2011 (UTC)
- Mmm, boobs... ~
21:20, 21 March 2011 - This is the single most important comment anyone has ever left on this page. I'll fix this issue as soon as possible. – Sir Skullthumper, MD (criticize • writings • critchat) 01:34 Mar 22, 2011
- Mmm, boobies. DJ Mixerr 23:10, March 22, 2011 (UTC) User:DJ Mixerr/sig
- MN-z, why not leave boobs on both categories, pics can have more than one category and that way someone can find them easier. And I don't even know what CA means, what's the difference between the two? Aleister 23:33 22-3-'11
- Pretty sure 'CA' means 'catch-all', so it would be the combination of the lot of the other ones, assuming it's properly updated, and his bot does a pretty good job of that. But yeah, the CA thing confused me as well. ~ 00:55, 23 March 2011
- Pretty sure 'CA' means 'catch-all', so it would be the combination of the lot of the other ones, assuming it's properly updated, and his bot does a pretty good job of that. But yeah, the CA thing confused me as well. ~
- MN-z, why not leave boobs on both categories, pics can have more than one category and that way someone can find them easier. And I don't even know what CA means, what's the difference between the two? Aleister 23:33 22-3-'11
- Mmm, boobies. DJ Mixerr 23:10, March 22, 2011 (UTC) User:DJ Mixerr/sig
Suggestion[edit source]
Is there any room to add the top 5 requested articles (ex. {{Special:WantedPages/5}} or, perhaps, the top 5 newest pages (ex. {{Special:NewPages/5}}) ? MadMax 17:56, April 17, 2011 (UTC)
- Good idea. I'll put that into the next version. I'm currently working on (e.g. thinking about) a system that will allow each user to customize AAG with their own widgets, and once that happens, there'll be widgets galore on this puppy. – Sir Skullthumper, MD (criticize • writings • critchat) 04:51 Apr 18, 2011