| Article: UnBooks:Requiem of a Gaussian Curve
|
Score: -3 pills detrimental to my creativity
|
| Nominated by:
|
– Sir Skullthumper, MD (criticize • writings • critchat) 00:33 Jun 25, 2009
|
For: 1
|
 For. At first I was like O_o but then, I lol'd. – Sir Skullthumper, MD (criticize • writings • critchat) 00:33 Jun 25, 2009
|
Against: 4
|
- Against. Suitably zany, but it doesn't feel finished at all. This is a good start, but it needs more. • • • Necropaxx (T) {~} 00:50, Jun 25
 Against. It looks distinctly undercooked for a VFH nomination. Doesn't really hang together and a little intro would help to explain the set up. -- RomArtus*Imperator ® (Orate). 09:04, 25 June 2009 (UTC)- Against. There's a germ of something good here, but it's more of an UnPamphlet than an UnBook at the moment. T. (talk) 10:44, 25 June 2009 (UTC)
- Against. per above. Mn-z 17:26, 25 June 2009 (UTC)
|
| Comments
|
- I must admit I like the shortness of this article. It doesn't force you to sit down and read through pages of text like most current FAs do. But that's a topic for another time. – Sir Skullthumper, MD (criticize • writings • critchat) 01:01 Jun 25, 2009
|
VFH
← Back to summary VFH
← Back to full VFH
For. 
Against. It looks distinctly undercooked for a VFH nomination. Doesn't really hang together and a little intro would help to explain the set up. --
