| Article: Cleveland Steamers
|
Score: -2
|
| Nominated by:
|
 Prof. Ahh(to the)Diddums[FUCK-A-DOODLE-DOO!] 04:58, 16 December 2008 (UTC)
|
For: 2
|
- Self Nom. I ran it through Pee Review a few weeks ago. - Prof. Ahh(to the)Diddums[FUCK-A-DOODLE-DOO!] 04:58, 16 December 2008 (UTC)
- Weak For. It has much potential, but it does tend to go towards childish. Parsat (talk / contribs) 23:34, 16 December 2008 (UTC)
|
Against: 4
|
- per my pee review of it.--Mnbvcxz 05:43, 16 December 2008 (UTC)
- Against - for now. As Mnbvcxz suggests in his Pee Review, it might be featurable with a bit more work. RabbiTechno 12:07, 16 December 2008 (UTC)
 No thanks • • • Necropaxx (T) {~} 16:06, Dec 16- Na Too much childish humour mixed in for it to be palatable to me. Agreed sometimes that can work well, but it's not working in this article this time IMO... Not bad though, I think the author has great potential for better stuff in the future. MrN
 20:07, Dec 16
|
VFH
← Back to summary VFH
← Back to full VFH
No thanks 
