Uncyclopedia:VFH/CNN

VFH overview

All nominations

Feature queue

Re-feature queue

Recently featured

Recently failed

Archive

Rules

CNN (history, logs) (feature) (remove)

Article: CNN	Score: 3.5
Nominated by:	AtomicAnon (talk) 17:18, 29 March 2026 (UTC)
For: 3.5	Zombiebaron. AtomicAnon (talk) 17:18, 29 March 2026 (UTC)  Half for. its a liiiiittle random, but plenty of significantly worse articles have been featured before MKyap!Fðllðw Ðåmågê †råïl 02:16, 30 March 2026 (UTC)  For. Noopnurf, Noopiest of Nurfs 09:50, 30 March 2026 (UTC)  For. Uncyclopedia. when they dissing yo goat but they lowk right TheLitThing (talk) 20:53, 31 March 2026 (UTC) TheLitThing (talk) 20:53, 31 March 2026 (UTC)
Against: 0	No against votes
Comments	This article is kind of meh. It's not bad, but just doesn't have the laughs, cleverness or umph that an article really ought to have to be featured. It's just not up to par with what we typically put on the front page. ShabiDOO 19:26, 29 March 2026 (UTC) Shabidoo Then vote against, that's what an against vote is for. It's not automatically sent to VFD if it fails VFH ー Preceding signed comment added by Squaw Dee (owns uncyclopedia • talk • contribs)  19:35, 29 March 2026 (UTC) We aren't obligated to vote against either just because we don't have a favourable opinion of an article. I only do that if I am very much against it (I'm not a fan myself of against votes and haven't done it for years). I'm still keen to express my opinion about the article even if I think an against vote isn't warranted. ShabiDOO 11:33, 30 March 2026 (UTC) Comment. Shabidoo Makes sense, I guess we just have different opinions about what an against vote is for ー Preceding signed comment added by Squaw Dee (owns uncyclopedia • talk • contribs)  15:46, 30 March 2026 (UTC)

VFH

← Back to summary VFH
← Back to full VFH