Forum:BENSON WAS BANNED AGAIN!

Forums: Index > BHOP > BENSON WAS BANNED AGAIN!

Note: This topic has been unedited for 6122 days. It is considered archived - the discussion is over. Do not add to unless it really needs a response.

How is this possible? --Crazyswordsman...With SAVINGS!!!! (T/C) 19:52, 12 January 2007 (UTC)

Apparently YELLING IN A FORUM is now enough to get you banned. I say we all go YELL IN THE MAIN FORUM and all also get banned as a sign of comraderie and support for Benson. --Composure1 20:16, 12 January 2007 (UTC)

It's not yelling. It's speaking in ALL CAPS. --Crazyswordsman...With SAVINGS!!!! (T/C) 21:08, 12 January 2007 (UTC)

IT'S ACTUALLY SPEAKING IN TONGUES - THE TONGUES OF BENSON. BUT HEATHEN ADMINS CAN'T UNDERSTAND IT AND ONLY PERCEIVE IT AS YELLING IN THEIR LITTLE MINDS. --Composure1 21:56, 12 January 2007 (UTC)

BENSON's tongues are like Holy Water to Famine. Since he cannot kill him, he just temporarily silenced him. :P Mr. Briggs Inc. 22:34, 12 January 2007 (UTC) Eh?

Awww, I just requested an exclusive interview with Benson... -- §. | WotM | PLS | T | C | A 01:14, 13 January 2007 (UTC)

For what? Is benson going to be on the frontpage of some famous newsparper?--Scott 01:19, 13 January 2007 (UTC)

Benson:The admins new favorite user to ban

Does anyone else agree with me that the Admins are now trying to ban benson for any "reason" they can find to ban him.--Scott 00:49, 13 January 2007 (UTC)

Yes. --AAA! (AAAA) 01:08, 13 January 2007 (UTC)

BENSON agrees. WHY? WHY AM I BANNED? Wait, how did BENSON do that? Oh, I guess I'm unbanned. Oh well. Benson 15:01, 13 January 2007 (UTC)

This is ridiculous. We've been using caps for quite some time now, and all of a sudden Famine decides that a well established injoke is grounds for banning. Famine is definately looking for any old excuse to ban BENSON and his followers. Jackass. --User:Nintendorulez 23:44, 13 January 2007 (UTC)

He says he's doing sigs next, so just prepare for the worst. --Crazyswordsman...With SAVINGS!!!! (T/C) 04:04, 14 January 2007 (UTC)

Well at least it would be us,inferior followers of Benson, instead of Benson who does not deserve to ban,for any reason.--Scott 04:11, 14 January 2007 (UTC)

So wait, how the hell is a sig grounds for banning? Jesus fucking Christ this is ridiculous. --User:Nintendorulez 17:37, 14 January 2007 (UTC)

It's not all admins

Some admins enjoy Benson, or at least don't hate him enough to constantly ban him for seemingly harless deeds. Don't group all of us together, there are only a few who truly hate Benson.   t o m p k i n s  blah. ﺞوﻦ וףה ՃՄ ண்ஸ ފއހ วอฏม +տ trade websites 22:25, 14 January 2007 (UTC)

well ofcource not you unblocked BENSON the first time.Savethemooses too ofcource--Scott 23:19, 14 January 2007 (UTC)

It varies from user to user really. Plenty of admins like him and plenty don't care about him. It's only a small group of both admins and non admins (especially new users and anons) who are out to get him. I've honestly seen more hatred from anons than admins. --Crazyswordsman...With SAVINGS!!!! (T/C) 23:26, 14 January 2007 (UTC)

Thus, your ability to use rational thought and whatnot makes you not admins by definition. You need to be spawned of pure evil to be an admin. You and STM are users who just so happen to have the sysop flag. ^_^ --User:Nintendorulez 23:28, 14 January 2007 (UTC)

Not all admins are like that. Many of them are actually very nice people. They just make themselves look evil because it's funny to pretend to be evil. --Crazyswordsman...With SAVINGS!!!! (T/C) 23:33, 14 January 2007 (UTC)

Ergo, you cannot truly call them admins. Even if they do have the sysop flag. --User:Nintendorulez 23:37, 14 January 2007 (UTC)

He was banned AGAIN!

This time for THREE days! And it WASN'T Famine this time! What the hell? --Crazyswordsman...With SAVINGS!!!! (T/C) 16:43, 15 January 2007 (UTC)

True: Benson's block log Seriously, I Don't understand it. Why bother?- -Kjhf!- (feeling chatty?) 16:55, 15 January 2007 (UTC)

Yeah. Why kill an injoke that's actually FUNNY? --Crazyswordsman...With SAVINGS!!!! (T/C) 17:05, 15 January 2007 (UTC)

Maybe you should ask Dawg? I won't. I'm not that brave ;) -Kjhf!- (feeling chatty?) 17:12, 15 January 2007 (UTC)

Also he hasn't typing in all caps lately--Scott 17:16, 15 January 2007 (UTC)

Yeah, it's an established injoke. Dammned admins. Plus, where's the particular edit in question this time anyway? --User:Nintendorulez 18:04, 15 January 2007 (UTC)

Well for the first two and last one, if you look up, he did talk in all CAPS. As for the third, he was being good. I still don't see what the point of banning him is. If you ban him, all his followers will rebel and type in all CAPS as well. -Kjhf!- (feeling chatty?) 17:28, 15 January 2007 (UTC)

The word BENSON is required by law to be typed in caps. As for the word 'caps', that was a sarcastic prod at how idiotic the admins get when it comes to banning. --User:Nintendorulez 19:45, 15 January 2007 (UTC)

Really? So I am supposed to write benson as benson? --KWild 02:35, 16 January 2007 (UTC)

No, you write it as BENSON (but NEVER link to the fake User:BENSON, since that is what we call a Fake Benson (Fake Benson is NEVER written in caps). But when referring to User:Benson, you MUST refer to him as BENSON. --Crazyswordsman...With SAVINGS!!!! (T/C) 02:40, 16 January 2007 (UTC)

Where in the Uncyclopedia rules does it say no yelling and why is it considered such a horrible crime in the first place? It's not like it's noise pollution like real life yelling. It's not like my eyes exactly bleed at the sight of capital letters. When somebody yells in a chat room, I don't think "Oh God, don't hurt me, I've already been slapped five times today and I don't like it when you're angry". If CAPS are so hated, why not huff AAAAAAAAA? why not ban the existence of capital letters period? in fact, that's what i will do from now on. i will never type a capital letter again. yeah. that will show those durn admins. or something. ooh, and i'm changing my userpage too. enjoy the ugliness! haha!User:Mrthejazz/sig 03:55, 16 January 2007 (UTC)

Is this right --> benson? --KWild 06:20, 16 January 2007 (UTC)

If you must mention fake Benson, that would be an acceptable way to do it. Better yet is to do what I've done and refer to him specifically as fake Benson, to avoid the pedantic, confusing ramblings that the BENSONites are prone to when they aren't simply shouting. Of course, we don't like to talk about fake Benson at all if we can help it. --The Acceptable  Cainad  (Fnord) 08:18, 16 January 2007 (UTC)

Damn. My clever plan was foiled. Oh well never mind I will just use the link when referring to the fake one then --KWild 11:21, 16 January 2007 (UTC)

Damn! Why did Dawg spoil my clean block sheet??? (For talk see chapter 8). -Kjhf!- (feeling chatty?) 16:22, 16 January 2007 (UTC)

PS mrthejazz change your sig if you're going on a no caps spee.

i did earlier but i forgot my talk link. there. all better. capital letters suck anyway. User:Mrthejazz/sig 19:11, 16 January 2007 (UTC)

I'm probably being a pain now, but you haven't done all your userpage. Or can't you be bothered? (E.g. links, templates...) -Kjhf!- (feeling chatty?) 20:06, 16 January 2007 (UTC)

let's see. i did forget a template. that will be briefly fixed. the only capitalized links are quotes, and that would turn all of those links into redlinks, and i can't do that. also, my talkpage will stay the same due to the "from now on" rule. also, i need the historical accuracy of the comments. there. now did i miss anything? User:Mrthejazz/sig 01:59, 17 January 2007 (UTC)

I'd say that was all. -Kjhf!- (feeling chatty?) 17:33, 17 January 2007 (UTC)

By the way, you can use this code: <code>“''QUOTE''”</code><br /> :<code>~ '''SOMEONE on SOMETHING'''</code><noinclude> if you want to muck about with the quote template for a particular page. -- 17:52, 17 January 2007 (UTC)

Well it looks like he is gone forever

So what are you guys going to do about your messiah now? – Preceding unsigned comment added by KWild (talk • contribs)

He still lives within our hearts. He will be with us forever, in spirit. --General Insineratehymn 21:37, 18 January 2007 (UTC)

He was unblocked.--Scott 22:33, 18 January 2007 (UTC)

Well, what are we going to name the BHOP forum now? --» >UF|TLK|▋» 22:04, 18 January 2007 (UTC)

I'M AVAILABLE FOR YOUR WORSHIP! PUNY MONKEYS! -- Sir Mhaille  (talk to me)

While it's comforting to know you'll always be there to scream at us and insult us in all caps Mhaille, it's just not the same. --Anyone 22:39, 18 January 2007 (UTC)

SILENCE WORM! -- Sir Mhaille  (talk to me)

It's still BHOP, but I've created a checkpoint of sorts to warn people before they enter. -- » Sir Savethemooses Grand Commanding Officer ... holla atcha boy» 22:41, 18 January 2007 (UTC)

I like the name "Benson's 3-D House Of Pancakes" anyways. It has a certain ring to it. --» >UF|TLK|▋» 22:45, 18 January 2007 (UTC)

It's like Doctor Tongue's 3-D House of Airline Stewardesses. Maybe not.--Sir Modusoperandi ^Boinc! 02:21, 19 January 2007 (UTC)

Oh Smeg. I forgot to sign my last message, I mean it is not so hard to press 4 tildes. I like the new checkpoint thingy. --KWild 01:59, 19 January 2007 (UTC)

BENSON'S BACK; BACK AGAIN

BENSON IS BACK AND READY TO stop yelling. UNTILL THEY TURN AWAY THEN BENSON SHALL SCREAM!!!!Benson 02:27, 19 January 2007 (UTC)

Benson's back.. (back back) back a-gain (gain, gain gain) Benson's back, Benson's back, Benson's back, Benson's back, Benson's back, Benson's back, back-back. I love Eminem... Or was it Chemical Brothers..? -Kjhf!- (feeling chatty?) 22:03, 19 January 2007 (UTC)