User:JackOfSpades/archive1

You're Welcome

-Mercenarylord^{Enter if you dare} 21:38, 13 April 2009 (UTC)

.

WHAT THE HELL DO YOU THINK YOU'RE DOING!?!? Do you realize that by supporting HowTo:Get Over Jenny, you are supporting insane, demented, homicidal stalkers everywhere? You should be ashamed. --CheddarBBQ

More Spam!

'FROM THE DESK OF GUILDENSTERNENSTEIN'

Thank you for supporting my recently featured article

Your support is greatly appreciated.

—Guildensternenstein

---

Thank You!

The doctor will see you now Oh, by the way, before we begin todays session, I'd like to thank you for supporting my recent featured article. Now, tell me about your childhood.-- You know what the music means... Our time is up.

conservation

hey jack. just wondering if Reel Big Fish was a rewrite or an original article, since i'm trying to wrap up conservation week. SirGerrycheeversGunTalk 19:05, 27 April 2009 (UTC)

It was originally a rewrite but it got huffed right before I changed it over. My version didn't include any of the huffed article though so it was more of a "from scratch" rewrite than fixing up someone else's work. --JackOfSpades (talk) 21:27, 27 April 2009 (UTC)

well, as it was an intended rewrite, and you still did more than most evryone else, you still earned your greasy mechanic award. congrats! SirGerrycheeversGunTalk 22:35, 27 April 2009 (UTC)

Reviewed your article.

Review here.

Saberwolf116 17:57, 29 April 2009 (UTC)

imawhore

vote for me please--Smokin' Cheddar BBQ: The King of the Triangular Snackfoods 23:33, 1 May 2009 (UTC)

Done and done. Hope Jenny makes it into the top 10. --JackOfSpades (talk) 20:34, 2 May 2009 (UTC)

Thank you.-- Whore cHeDDaR 19:37,6May,2009

For some guy who writes here

Helpful Whoring-- Whore cHeDDaR 19:16,6May,2009

About the Thin Mints review.

It was good, but in all respect, I think some things are better left. The sub-sections are important, at least I think so, or at least, like, I don't know, but I like them. I added one more picture, of a Peppermint Pattie, but I think I'll leave off there. I changed the improperly formatted sentence. I see what you mean about the bias, but that's not what I was going for. I don't want him to be biased towards one type of Thin Mint, just a bit, ya know, conspiracy-theoristic with a touch of formality, if that makes sense. Anyways, Thanks for your review. I hope to have your vote when I eventually nom it.-- Whore cHeDDaR 19:36,6May,2009

Hope it was of some help to you JackOfSpades (talk) 19:39, 6 May 2009 (UTC)

Also, the new pic definitely helps illustrate the article. JackOfSpades (talk) 19:54, 6 May 2009 (UTC)

Phanks!

"Joshy, what do you say to all the nice boys and girls...?" Uh… Oh yeah thanks! Mrs Peterson said that I had to thank you all for voting on my story, even if you do all have stupid names. Daddy read it too and then he told me that he lied about the sharks as well as his hands being tied up! Mummy gave him a row though so it’s ok now. But now I want to know what the men and women who fight the boy-eating sharks do! Dandelion thinks they’re bankers.

Glad you liked it! :D. Also, hello, I don't believe we've really met before. :) ~Orian57~ ~Talk~ 22:21 6 May 2009

Moved your article

I've moved your article to User:JackOfSpades/Vans Warped Tour conspires against San Deigo college student because it's really not funny, and it's borderline vanity. I extended you the courtesy of doing so instead of deleting or ICUing because you seem to be a decent sort, and I liked UnNews:Padres’ pitcher on rampage, kills twelve. If you like, I'll delete it for you, or you can fix it up. In either case, cheers! Rev. Zim_ulator (Talk) I am the dirt under your rollers 08:23, 9 May 2009 (UTC)

Yeah you can go ahead and delete it. I wrote three versions and didn't really like any of them. JackOfSpades (talk) 17:53, 9 May 2009 (UTC)

Signature

What would you like? —Sir Socky (talk) (stalk) GUN SotM UotM PMotM UotY PotM WotM 20:12, 9 May 2009 (UTC)

I kind of got it. What I was looking to do was the have the pic disappear and have my old signature take its place when it was moused over, but after looking at your 2nd sig I opted out to having it like this. (talk) 20:16, 9 May 2009 (UTC)

Now I just need to close that tag... (talk) 20:16, 9 May 2009 (UTC)

Making the original text disappear would be quite difficult. Making text appear between the two images wouldn't a problem though. —Sir Socky (talk) (stalk) GUN SotM UotM PMotM UotY PotM WotM 20:23, 9 May 2009 (UTC)

Chearz!@!

Thanks for reviewing phr33 st00f pl0x. I'm going to completely rewrite it anyway. -- Captain Nerd(Talk)

Hope it helped. (talk) 19:32, 10 May 2009 (UTC)

Another generic "Reviewed your article" message.

Yay.

Saberwolf116 01:48, 11 May 2009 (UTC)

Thanks. (talk) 02:00, 11 May 2009 (UTC)

Also, is it just me or does my Username Template not work? (talk) 05:44, 11 May 2009 (UTC)

It just showed up as a brief sentence. I hate those things anyway, though. Saberwolf116 17:53, 11 May 2009 (UTC)

Bgaaaah!

'FROM THE DESK OF GUILDENSTERNENSTEIN'

Thank you for supporting my recently featured article.

And no, I have no intention of changing this template any time soon.

—Sir Guildensternenstein

---

To avoid drama

I'll ask nicely, instead of screaming at you? Will you please check out my article, your almighty Jackliness?-- Whore cHeDDaR 17:35,11May,2009

Jackliness? I kind of like it. Anyway I'll look over your article when I'm done with final and stuff today. (talk) 17:56, 11 May 2009 (UTC)

Tweet

Mr McElroy says thanks! his blog is teh funnies! 11:44pm May 14th from web tanks for teh voats! 11:45pm May 14th from web

~Orian57~ ~Talk~ 09:32 14 May 2009

Say, thanks!

Hey Jack, thanks for the nom! Much appreciated.   Le Cejak • <10:18 May 15, 2009>

No problem. (talk) 16:53, 15 May 2009 (UTC)

Another review

Coming your way. Saberwolf116 02:20, 16 May 2009 (UTC)

Der Unwehr

Check this out, and join if you really want to: User:Guildensternenstein/Der Unwehr —Sir Guildensternenstein 21:37, 18 May 2009 (UTC)

As soon as I get Internet on my computer I'll sign up. Don't expect too much from me though. (Damn, editing from an iPhone is unecessarily hard) (talk) 22:15, 18 May 2009 (UTC)

Godot Sequels

http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Waiting_for_Godot#Works_inspired_by_Godot

- 123.243.5.73 07:28, 19 May 2009 (UTC)

Much thanks. (talk) 07:37, 19 May 2009 (UTC)

Thanks

'FROM THE DESK OF GUILDENSTERNENSTEIN'

Thank you for supporting Metal Gear Solid 3: Snake Eater.

To show my appreciation, I'd like to eat your snake.

—Guildensternenstein

---

(template courtesy of CheddarBBQ) —Unführer Guildy Ritter von Guildensternenstein 15:51, 22 May 2009 (UTC)

Thanks

Thanks for voting for my article, Dear Diary. And do rest assured that I am not a violent or vindictive person, and that voting no would have in no way resulted in me abusing my administrative powers to crush you like a grape. ~ Todd Lyons

And for the kind comment. --T. (talk) 11:11, 28 May 2009 (UTC)

Thanks!

—Sir Socky (talk) (stalk) GUN SotM UotM PMotM UotY PotM WotM 10:59, 1 June 2009 (UTC)

Award

Rabbi Techno would like to honour you with the coveted

BLUE SCROTUM AWARD
Which is given to those who have demonstrated remarkably excellent judgement,
impeccable good taste and faultless, all-encompassing wisdom
(by doing something like voting for ME to win WotM).
Well done and thankyou, from Rabbi Techno.

---

Hey Dude

Where are you? —Sir Socky (talk) (stalk) GUN SotM UotM PMotM UotY PotM WotM 16:32, 2 July 2009 (UTC)

Yet another user leaves without warning. First Nachlader, now him... Saberwolf116 02:10, 4 July 2009 (UTC)

It's you!

I remember you! —Sir Socky (talk) (stalk) GUN SotM UotM PMotM UotY PotM WotM 04:20, 8 February 2011

:D You're probably the only one. My two week hiatus turned into a year and a half... (talk)

I don't remember you... probably becuase I wasn't even here at the time. Anyhow, hello, intriguing one. 1234 ~ 04:27, 8 February 2011

I remember you, Jack. How's it been? MegaPleb • Dexter111344 • Complain here 04:29, February 8, 2011 (UTC)

I guess I was more popular than I thought. Pretty good, just college stuff, ya know? (talk) 04:43, February 8, 2011 (UTC)

Howdy...

Could you read our deletion policy again before nominating any stuff on VFD please. Thanks--Sycamore (Talk) 12:22, February 11, 2011 (UTC)

Thanks

Thanks very much for your vote on Pearl necklace. And you first saw the dog pic, which must have been interesting. I only put pop ups in the See also on this one, and in another page (Warm piss water), and that seems kind of fun to do. And you've been getting around like a speed car on the site, it's good to have you here again (although I came on after your first sojourn)! Aleister 20:04 15-2-'11

Excuse me!

But it appears you have stolen my sig!  JackOfSpades [talk] 03:13, February 20, 2011 (UTC)

I was here first bitch. (talk) 03:35, February 20, 2011 (UTC) (Suck it!)

Fine - keep your stupid sig. I'm going back to my old one. Pup 03:36 20 Feb '11

Good, that one didn't suit you anyway. (talk) 03:38, February 20, 2011 (UTC)

hydrogen!!

Hey there, are you planning on doing any more work on this at all? I've rewritten the first half and added some pics, but it could still use more. --Black Flamingo 21:44, February 22, 2011 (UTC)

I saw you working on that. It's certainly much better than when it was on VFD. I'll definitely take a look at it sometime this week (maybe this weekend, calc test on friday, ugh) and see if I can improve anything. If I don't edit by sunday I'll probably leave some ideas on the talk page. (talk) 21:48, February 22, 2011 (UTC)

Cheers!

I got you a bandwagon, since you said you like them, to say thanks for voting for me. --Holy Shit It's Neonazi powell 09:11, February 23, 2011 (UTC)

Sweeeet! (talk) 16:14, February 23, 2011 (UTC)

UnNews:Wainwright to undergo Tommy Gun surgery

...is today's featured story, after a bit of grammar from me. Spıke ¬ 15:22 27-Feb-11

---

Oh no! You're added to UnNews:UnNewsAudio#Other writers whose stuff got broadcast! Add your national flag, if you care. Spıke ¬ 01:46 28-Feb-11

Wait, I'm confused. What does that mean? (talk) 02:05, February 28, 2011 (UTC)

Means I did an UnNews Audio of your story--click in the upper right of your story, or it is also accessible from the UnNews Front Page. Fortunately, you added your flag, perhaps even before you figured this out! Spıke ¬ 02:08 28-Feb-11

Whoo hoo, dancing!

Thank you for voting for the Madison Movement article! I hope it gets featured so we can send the "troops" (or at least the two of them who read Uncy) a boost. And you are doing a great job here lately, something I have been too thoughtless to come by and say before. Thanks again, Aleister 2:34 28-2-'11

Trains

I really don't mind, I always travel by car (my dad drives though, since I'm 17 and here you have to be 18 to get a drivving license). The whole train system sucks. Except for Berlusconi, the lack of work and the crappy music and films Italy rocks though :P --Flaming Ace 10:22, February 28, 2011 (UTC)

pee review

Jack please dont pee review that article. It is a collaboration and it is TOTALLY NOT CLOSE TO READY. Thanks. Ill let you know when it is --ShabiDOO 23:37, March 2, 2011 (UTC)

If you really don't want me to review Stupid Cats then I won't. However, I'm confused on why you seem to be so...adamant about not having it reviewed. Getting a review doesn't mean you are done working on it, most of the time it means the opposite. Even if you aren't done writing the article a review can give you a fresh view of your work and might be able to catch things you will need to rewrite before they get integrated into the rest of the article. The absolute worst that could happen is having the reviewer tell you to do something you were already going to do. If you want more time to work on it feel free to not get it reviewed. I just don't think a review would hurt. (talk) 23:45, March 2, 2011 (UTC)

Theres a bunch of reasons why, but the main reason is, its a collaboration. We took turns writing and its not even close to ready for a review because 1, by tomorrow it will be a verry diffrernt article and your review will be about the immature article of yesterday 2, a review in a few days will be a LOT more helpful and 3, cause its totally not polished and random doodlings that we just wrote. It doesnt have to be 100% ready, but at the most I would say its 10% and more realistically 5%. There isnt even a concept behind it but random shit. So again, hey, jack, if you want go ahead and review, but even better just leave some suggestions on the talk page or collaborate and contribute than do what is, essentially a pee review, from probably a good pee review of an article that will not even be what it was by tomorrow. You get my shiz now brotha? But if you are ITCHING to review, then go ahead. :) --ShabiDOO 23:55, March 2, 2011 (UTC)

I'm happy since you have more reasons than "It isn't done." I think I had like...4 reviews on my first main space article that I wrote 2 years ago and I still don't think it's done. I wish you guys luck with writing this baby up, and I might even check in on it every once in a while over the next couple days. (talk) 00:00, March 3, 2011 (UTC)

Hello Mr. Spades

I've done some work on Phobias and Carlos (or whatever it's called) on VFD, and fixed the dates of the shows problem that you had. I hope it meets with your satisfaction (and I hope you get some satisfaction). I haven't told you what a great user-name you have, so now consider yourself told. Aleister 16:29 5-3-'11

Yes, yes, very well. I should let you know that you lose points for linking neither Phineas and Ferb nor VFD on my talk page thus forcing me to open another tab to do your bidding while still half asleep (which is also your fault for some reason.) Also, Mr. Spades is my father. (talk) 21:53, March 5, 2011 (UTC)

Yes, we did have a hell of a night last night, didn't we. Hair of the dog should do it. And maybe P and F isn't that good after all, I don't know why I got involved in it. Aleister 21:59 5-3-'11

It's shit covered gold much like the San Francisco Giants article (if you know anything about baseball.) Keeping the article would keep all the gold, but not all the shit which is why I was torn to begin with. I just thought everything good in it was accidental when I saw the dates on the episodes. (talk) 22:40, March 5, 2011 (UTC)

Thanks

for the review on Chandler. I think you're right about changing it to an Unbooks style and I know what you mean about the shorter scene. But the line about the tattoo is lifted almost directly from a Marlowe novel - though I don't think think the Honey Monster was mentioned. I'll look at that part again and Poirot's reaction to Marlowe's snide comments. Thanks again, always good to get another opinion --Sog1970 09:30, March 6, 2011 (UTC)

Think it's basically done now, except for making it look more like an UnScripts. God knows why the new version of the Miss Ohlsen pic is being ignored. I expanded that section because all Marlowe novels have him fending off women and being really rude. --Sog1970 16:14, March 6, 2011 (UTC)

That makes more sense now, although that line about his tattoo is extremely strange, but if it comes from one of the books then by all means use it. I just thought it was something random. (talk) 18:03, March 6, 2011 (UTC)

I'm such a whore - I nommed myself. Again. Thanks for helping me polish my turd.--Sog1970 22:56, March 6, 2011 (UTC)

And my thanks comes forward here for your very good (for me!) review of Skunk. You said so many nice things that I had to go out and rent two billboards to hold them all. Thank you. And your criticism of the uneven areas is right on, that whole section is the part which bothers me the most, but I haven't yet put in the time to really polish the page. Satan, who has my soul in a thing like a little bird cage near his ottoman, liked your review too and wants to talk to you about your future. He's quite the kidder, but if you can get him into his honest and sincere inner-boy mode, boom, score! I'll let you know when I think Skunk is a bit more polished. Thanks again! Aleister 2:15 8-3-'11

My pizza story=

Only one was a poem. The rest were the things talking. How do you see three poems? President Barack Obama 02:23, March 9, 2011 (UTC)

There were a few soft rhymes. I assumed it was supposed to be a collaborative poem. (talk) 02:35, March 9, 2011 (UTC)

You've got a case of poetry on the brain, mister. President Barack Obama 10:54, March 9, 2911 (UTC)

I'm glad to see that you've taken an interest in saving some pictures...

...but could you please not use {{notorphan}} any more? The admins have determined that using this template as a means of saving images just creates a whole new, similar, problem. If you could instead add them to a page such as User:JackOfSpades/Gallery that would be preferable. Thanks, -- The Zombiebaron 06:19, March 9, 2011 (UTC)

No problem. (talk) 06:20, March 9, 2011 (UTC)

Time Lords

Why are we mortal enemies? Can't Time Lords just get along? I thought it's like a frateernity or something (and why aren't you a member of our frat???). Are we enemes of Pippi Longstocking too? That could be fun. Aleister 5:01 11-3-'11

Oh well, if you've ever seen Doctor Who, the Doctor and the Master are mortal enemies. I just wanted to change the title on your user page to "The Master" and leave a challenge in the edit summary that you could easily revert back. We can be mortal enemies if you want though. I'm an alien from a distant galaxy that is only weak to small chunks of my home planet. I'm also invincible if you don't have any of that. Just so you know. (talk) 05:05, March 11, 2011 (UTC)

I wrote you a long answer yesterday, went to post it, and the wiki had broken. Anyway, blah blah blah I have many chunks of your home planet blah blah why be enemies when Pippi Longstocking can do both of us blah blah join the frat six features out of six projects blah blah blah long answer went on. Prepare to die, more or less. Or let's just enjoy Pippi solo and in teams of four. Aleister 23:30 11-3-'11

And not one reference to the dark side. I'm impressed. (talk) 23:33, March 11, 2011 (UTC)

Dark, light, six of one, half dozen blah blah. Got to play in both and merge them, or else going down either of the side paths has to be done all the way or you don't get the results blah blah. Aleister 23:39 11-3-'11

Blah? Blah blah blah! Aleister 3:46 13-3-'11

Bob Lob Law. (talk) 03:47, March 13, 2011 (UTC)

Okami

Ya, thanx for the Pee-Rewiewing! I`ll try to fix the things you wrote, just now I dont... want... Zzz... But, hey, thanx! Cat the Colourful (Feed Me!!!)Leave me alone... 12:53, March 11, 2011

There's an IP on my page!! Get it off, get it off!!

• Because I'm making this just for fun (sorry of my bad english). 189.81.8.152 03:37, March 12, 2011 (UTC)

IP's must be exterminated like cock-a-roaches. We should have an IP Hotel, where they can go in but they can't get out. Thanks for your Skunk vote! I still can't get over (and get over bragging about) your pee review. Well, I reworked the awkward section but it still needs a tweak or two, I'll get on that now. Everything much appreciated. Aleister 23:46 14-3-'11

The last line of the HowTo:Fuck a skunk section will answer all. Aleister 00:12 Ides of March '11

Thank you

I shall cherish it forever. -- 00:22, March 16, 2011 (UTC)

Jewkip

...how do you like the new and improved version ? -- 17:04, March 16, 2011 (UTC)

Definitely improved. I really like this concept, keep working with it as you're on the right track and investing more time into an article will always improve it. Keep going I really like where this is headed. (talk) 18:43, March 16, 2011 (UTC)

hello again

Hi, I hope you remember me, I'm Wack Broomhead. I just started creating an article on Geometry Set, I'm not done with it yet, but this is my first article. So please don't delete it if you don't like it. But please tell me how it can be improved(I don't have experience writing articles) and, if you please, edit it to make it funnier.

Hoping for a reply...!Wacko! 05:14, March 17, 2011 (UTC)

I'm actually not an admin so I can't delete anything. Also, the construction tag that you put on your article will keep it from being deleted as long as you edit it at least once a week. (talk) 05:49, March 17, 2011 (UTC)

but how is it? is it good, or does it simply suck? If the latter, please tell me how I can make it better...

At least tell me if admins will delete the article if I remove the construction tag?!Wacko! 05:52, March 17, 2011 (UTC)

As it is right now. Yeah, they probably would. That's why you should keep the construction tag on until you are done with your article. I would definitely recommend taking out the reference to yourself as it makes it seem like vanity with that link. I can see the concept being good, but you need to expand the article to be a lot longer, just spend some time on it now. Don't use bold so often, it makes the article look unprofessional and distracts readers. That's about all I can say right now. If you want more pointers just take it down to pee review when you're done. (talk) 06:36, March 17, 2011 (UTC)

Damn...

I love you, man. 1234 ~ 06:57, 17 March 2011

Uh...thanks? Why? (talk) 07:05, March 17, 2011 (UTC)

*whistles* 1234 ~ 08:03, 17 March 2011

See

this. And for the love of God, learn what a rhetorical question is. MegaPleb • Dexter111344 • Complain here 23:59, March 17, 2011 (UTC)

Um... (talk) 00:00, March 18, 2011 (UTC)

more hyrdogen

Jack, I like the section about Urey, but it really really doesn't fit there - it's totally off-topic. I've trimmed it a little but tried to keep some of my favourite bits. Just wanted to run it by you, but feel free to restore anything if you think I've been a bit harsh. --Black Flamingo 23:45, March 18, 2011 (UTC)

I actually like the information in the caption for the picture. It doesn't break the flow of that section. Really good idea. (talk) 03:08, March 20, 2011 (UTC)

UnScripts:Superman's first adventure

I've added some images, and made some changes in the text. Tell me if it's any improvement on the article's talk page, will ya? --Scofield 13:35, March 20, 2011 (UTC)

UnNews:Radiation hits California, causes super-heroes

Good job! I gave it a shorter and more direct headline. Keep going! How about more anecdotes of first-day California superheroes? But the Surgeon General saying the US is the only important nation is trite, and will make our offshore readers groan, because most of them already seriously think we think so. Spıke ¬ 16:30 20-Mar-11

I like the headline, and I added another example of a super power although it's probably not as obvious as I want it to be (people are gaining the superpowers of a gas and/or a cloud.) (talk) 19:24, March 20, 2011 (UTC)

Also: "Unlikely," "surprising"--In news or in UnNews (which you want to make look like news), don't lead your reader by stating conclusions before he can draw them. You may use any other con-job in the book, though. I added a third superhero anecdote, along the lines of Fantastic Four. Spıke ¬ 00:05 21-Mar-11

PS--Now in the lead spot on the Front Page. Tell your grandchildren some day. Spıke ¬ 00:15 21-Mar-11

I'm done editing my article

What do you think? -- 04:15, March 21, 2011 (UTC)

I like the stuff you changed. You forgot the '' on one of the quotes, but I added those in for you. (talk) 04:23, March 21, 2011 (UTC)

Thanks! -- 14:19, March 21, 2011 (UTC)

And amidst the geese and ducks prevailt!

Actually, not really. You've just done a crapload of pee reviews of lately, and it'd downright astounding. You've also earnt yourself this:

Golden Urinal

You have been awarded this coveted Golden Urinal in recognition of having completed over 25 in-depth pee reviews. Thanks for the hard work.
Now have a rehydrating drink, and get back to pissing – there are still articles out there that need your help, dammit!

---

Cheers. Please don't burn out like most of them do, eh? 1234 ~ 04:40, 21 March 2011

Nooo! My beautiful talk page! What have you done!? (talk) 04:47, March 21, 2011 (UTC)

Nice work. Keep it up, Jacky Boy. --Black Flamingo 17:17, March 21, 2011 (UTC)

Thanks

And congratulations. Now you have somewhere to pee instead of the side of the house. Thanks for your visit to the Viking Metal Fashion Show. Gwen appreciates your vote and will visit your abode tonight, to stand in an awkward position to try out your new urinal. She gives good head (I of course mean "bathroom" by "head", in case Mimo wanders by). Thanks again! Aleister 22:07 21-3-'11

Yo

You mean you still haven't see Zombiebaron or Aleister's user page? --~  12:51, March 22, 2011 (UTC)

I've definitely seen Aleister's. I don't know about ZB's. My computer doesn't always purple-out the ones I go to, and resets random pages sometimes just days after I visit them. But yes it is a conundrum. (talk) 18:32, March 22, 2011 (UTC)

What about mine? --~  19:39, March 22, 2011 (UTC)

Yep, although I usually don't bother with user pages as I use mine just to store stuff I find useful for myself, there's not a lot there for other people. (talk) 19:41, March 22, 2011 (UTC)

Pee Review

Thanks for the review. I should probably explain my motives to make everything more clear. I intended for the article to be written from the point of view of an ignorant noob who associates trolling with being bad and being bad with overusing profanity and (often dead) memes. I wanted him to present as the worst troll ever while claiming himself to be the best. So, I had him do subtle follies like spelling "lulz" wrong and more obvious ones like trying to prove Anonymous to be a bunch of phony trolls by describing them as exactly what trolls really are. I attempted to escalate the writer's stupidity as the article progressed with things like his circular insults of JB and pointing to two lemons as OVER 9000. The whole peer pressure thing was just meant to be an ironic jab at his telling of the reader to "like Family Guy or they can't be a troll", even doing the same thing in the section itself. I didn't intend for there to be any insults in the article, though, besides the occasional tongue-in-cheek put down, and will try to spot and remove instances of that.

All in all, I wanted the article to be a satire of the perceptions of trolling you'd see among middle schoolers and the like, and thought the deliberate use of inaccuracies to this purpose would be more apparent, which it must not be, considering I had to explain everything. Is there anything you think I can do to help prevent readers from taking this more seriously than they should, because though you gave a great review that brought up many good points, I could see that you didn't really catch on to what I was trying to do. — JCM 21:51, March 23, 2011 (UTC)

Since you haven't responded, I'll just assume you have nothing more to say. I improved it the best I could according to your review and just hope that it's enough. — JCM 22:33, March 25, 2011 (UTC)

A great experience

Thank you again for liking "Skunk". It looks like the crowds have in effect voted it down on VFH, so the high point of the page for me is knowing that one person liked it very much. I had a similar experience on Snow angels, which I think is a really good article (don't we all like our own stuff? The sin of the writer) but it fell like a brick on VFH and went -3 quickly. But Rabbi Techno read the whole thing, liked it, and gave me wonderful comments on it on, of all places, the vote on the writer of de year thing. The article which went -3 within days literally won that award for me, so you never know. Thanks again, and your support on Skunk is very appreciated. Aleister 00:45 25-3-'11

I'm actually really surprised. I thought it was going to easily be one of the 13/0 articles. It's definitely featureable so you never know what'll happen. About everyone liking their own stuff, I'm the exact opposite. I never like what I write. I actually just got one of my articles reviewed just so I could confirm the fact that I shouldn't like what I wrote (which I think is narcissistic in some weird way.) It's the main reason I don't think I'll ever selfnom anything. (talk) 01:14, March 25, 2011 (UTC)

Thanks. I'm not 'shamed to self-nom, because it's lucky when someone noms your page. Just as long as a good pee review exists, and you address the concerns of the review, a selfnom is just saying that you think it works. If others do, that's just extra pudding on the licorice stick. It's really not that serious anyway, as you can see from some nommed articles/talk pages/recent changes. Funnybony worked his brain to a nub on his newest self-nom, and it looks like it's going down like the Titanic, so it doesn't hurt to throw one up there from time to time. Aleister 1:28 25-3-'11

Haha. Nub. Nub is a funny word I think I'll start using it now. (talk) 01:31, March 25, 2011 (UTC)

I know you don't like your own stuff, but...

How would you feel about a VFH nom of Hydrogen!!? I think it works, don't know what everyone else thinks. --Black Flamingo 22:24, March 26, 2011 (UTC)

*sigh* if you must...But seriously, it's probably feature worthy, and if it's not well...we could use the against votes to improve it. (talk) 22:26, March 26, 2011 (UTC)

Put it on VFH if you didn't notice. (talk) 19:40, March 29, 2011 (UTC)

New Header

Hey i am sorry i keep taking it off, but i keep accidentally deleting it, because my keyboard is wierd. I really am sorry– Preceding unsigned comment added by Questionable (talk • contribs)

That's odd. You don't seem to be having a problem not deleting any of the other lines that you've written. (talk) 23:46, March 28, 2011 (UTC)

touche.– Preceding unsigned comment added by Questionable (talk • contribs)

Also, don't forget to sign your edits to talk pages with 4 tildes (~) (talk) 23:48, March 28, 2011 (UTC)

*Achoo!*

Excuse me. Anyway, it looks to me that you voted for on HowTo:Become a Master of Disguise and were inducted into the brotherhood of disguise masters. Well guess what? It made it into featured queue, which entitles you to the golden Groucho Marx glasses award. Congratulations.

Thanks for the vote, dude!

-- 15:28, March 29, 2011 (UTC)

Congrats

	Reviewer of the Month March 2011

Keep up the good work. --ChiefjusticeWii 00:26, April 1, 2011 (UTC)

Wooooo! (talk) 00:27, April 1, 2011 (UTC)

Thanks

I appreciate your review--it was succinct, encouraging, and most of all helpful. I'm going to make some tweaks right after I'm done writing this, mainspace it, and see how it fairs on VFH. Thanks again. —Unführer Guildy Ritter von Guildensternenstein 03:28, April 1, 2011 (UTC)

Glad it was helpful. (talk) 03:29, April 1, 2011 (UTC)

I just put it up on VFH, just so you know. —Unführer Guildy Ritter von Guildensternenstein 04:14, April 1, 2011 (UTC)

Football Thanks

FROM THE DESK OF GUILDENSTERNENSTEIN

Thank you for supporting my recently featured UnNews piece.

I appreciate it, and stuff.

—Unführer Guildy Ritter von Guildensternenstein 15:07, April 4, 2011 (UTC)

---

Disclaimer Thanks

Hello Jacko, thanks for editing my page, and removing the disclaimers. I put them up there to prove a point to the person on Talk:The Romanovs as he/she seemed confused that my article might not be perfect, it was my first, and that my article was nonsensical. My article on Jonah is under the category Stupidity, really? And they wondered why my articles aren't full of factual info? Really? Anywho, thank-you, i will just ignore them until they have something to say that i can actually use to improve my articles. Do you have any hints on making an article good enough not to be deleted? --Purple&Pink 20:44, April 6, 2011 (UTC)

My number one piece of advice to any newcomer is to read HTBFANJS. It's at great article on how to develop a mindset which is conducive to Uncyclopeida's environment. Also, you should read The beginner's guide which has a lot of stuff you should know. (talk) 20:49, 6 April 2011

Thanks! --Purple&Pink 21:15, April 6, 2011 (UTC)

Question?

Hey i was wondering what the specifications for an article to reach the front page. I am hoping to create a new article and i am going to try to use some advice from Romartus because he was pretty adamant about my articles being poor. So, yea, what would specifications be, do i need to do something and then receive votes? Idk, but yea… --Purple&Pink 15:52, April 7, 2011 (UTC)

In order for you to nominate your own article to get featured you have to get a pee review of it. Then, after you followed the instructions of the person who gave you the pee review you can nominate it on VFH. However, only exceptional articles get featured. A lot of users, including Romartus, try to just write articles that are humorous rather than trying to get featured, which is what I would recommend doing. If you just write funny stuff you'll get featured eventually. Also, please don't copy signatures when you're talking about a person. Most people on here know each other and I know exactly who Romartus is. Copying a signature just makes it look like he's talk to me as well. (talk) 17:17, 7 April 2011

Sorry for the use of sig won't happen again, and ok...thanks...--Purple&Pink 00:53, April 8, 2011 (UTC)

a question

My Fantard article Has the "case report" Section getting deleted by you with the reason being cyberbullying.Is there really a person called Yaoigodklan144? Just asking,and if this person really exsists,It is merely a coincidence.--FCUKSHITCUNT!!!!!!!!11111111 07:54, April 8, 2011 (UTC)

If there isn't someone with that name then by all means restore that section. However, I would advise against such a direct tone as Uncyclopedia is a parody of an encyclopedia which means that a more neutral tone should be taken. Something more along the lines of "A typical fantard will spend their free time on deviantart. As the site requires registering a screen name a fantard will focus their screen name on their chosen obsession. Typically they will choose something such as 'Yaoigodklan144,' 'Sasuk3izs0kawaii,' or 'YAMIYUGIIWANTURBABYS1111.'" Just a suggestion. (talk) 16:57, 8 April 2011

isn't it a bit weird

that you're tracking me around the site? Have I been involuntarily adopted by you or something? 04:30, April 11, 2011 (UTC)

I am? I wasn't aware. (talk) 04:30, 11 April 2011

Hahaha, now I got you

You made the Pee Review... I`m gonna make you pay for it do a big thanxes. THANX that you made it, now I can fix the misspelling errors that you reported... raported... whatever

You made a cool Review, and I`m glad that it even HAD so cool points. But there was one thing you didn`t understand.

The tip on the side also doesn't really add anything to the article as it's actually good advice. It's also kind of common sense, which could be funny if you're article is just full of common sense thing "disguised" as super secret tips.

You are a bit wrong. That tip is a secret and clever joke, which is not a joke, but still it is. Think it for a while. Before going into the forest, learn all the poisonous mushrooms. Then take only the mushrooms you know. Think think think... Learn all the poisonous mushrooms. Then take the mushrooms you only know. Same as like: Take the mushrooms you have learned... Got it? Cat the Colourful (Feed me!) Zzz 05:06, 11 April, 2011 (UTC)

Ah, I see. In that case you should make it a little more obvious. It can easily be read as "just take all the ones you know are safe." like I did. You could make it something like "Get a book of poisonous mushrooms, and make sure the ones you eat match the pictures in the book." (talk) 05:16, 11 April 2011

Hey, thats good idea. Very good! Cat the Colourful (Feed me!) Zzz 05:18, 11 April, 2011 (UTC)

Your last edit

I didn't realize I couldn't take that off. You see, you'll notice I added a construction template, and then removed it with your tag, assuming that someone saw the construction template and added that. But may I ask why? NERVUN 23:42, April 11, 2011 (UTC)

I would appreciate it if you looked at the tag before coming to my talk page. However, since you're here, you should read the ICU article on what to do about the tag, read the tag itself and read HTBFANJS as well as The beginner's guide to figure out how we like to do things on this site.

About the article, it's very short and not very funny. It all revolves around the joke that "noone" [sic] cares is a popular term to use, which isn't that great of a joke, especially when you use it 20 times in 20 lines of text. We also already have a similar, much better, article Nobody cares. You also said on the talk page that you copied a lot of it from ED which is a no-no. Posting something here means that you've come up with the text of the article yourself, and usually the concept, although that isn't always the case. (talk) 23:49, 11 April 2011

I did look at the tag, and I wanted your reasoning. Yes, I read the ICU article. Already read The Beginner's Guide. I'll give you that it's short, but whether it's funny or not is a matter of perspective. Yes, I repeated different versions of the joke, but why else would the article exist? To talk about how awesome Peter Noone is? No, to discover the different ways the joke can be applied out of context. Nobody cares revolves around "nobody," a philosophical non-person, like when you say, I'm eating nothing, technically, you're eating something. It all stems from Odysseus's little trick of telling Polyphemus he was Nobody. I co-authored the original article on ED. NERVUN 00:01, April 12, 2011 (UTC)

If you indeed have read all of those things you should know that it's (right now) not the type of article we're looking for on the site. If you think the article stands up on its own you can bring it up with an admin like Olipro or Zombiebaron. In regards to the article, I'm not saying the content is the same, I'm saying the joke is the same, which it is. (talk) 01:26, 12 April 2011

Not at all. Noone is based on a typo, where Nobody is... well, what I said above. NERVUN - talk 02:50, April 12, 2011 (UTC)

Jesus God, NERVUN! Turn it off! Spıke ¬ 00:36 13-Apr-11

Johnny, is that you? Johnny?

Johnny?– Preceding unsigned comment added by 86.145.144.38 (talk • contribs)

Who told you my name? (talk) 19:34, 12 April 2011

No, I'm looking for John. SP. Cases. You know where he is?– Preceding unsigned comment added by 86.145.144.38 (talk • contribs)

You're probably looking for Another n00b (talk) 19:38, 12 April 2011

Who is that? Johnny? Johnny?

UN:VFS

Increment your God-damned counts. Cheers. Spıke ¬ 00:28 13-Apr-11

Yeah, yeah. (talk) 00:28, 13 April 2011

P.S. You're one minute behind the times Spikey old chum. (talk) 00:29, 13 April 2011

Hmm. How so? Spıke ¬ 00:34 13-Apr-11

Incremented my scores 1 minute before you posted this. (talk) 00:35, 13 April 2011

Okay. Lyrithya can see everything on one of her four screens; I can't. Spıke ¬ 00:38 13-Apr-11

I can? 1234 ~ 16:50, 13 April 2011

Psychedelic music

Thanks for your Psychedelic vote from Sog & Funnybony

--Funnybony    20:52, Apr 14

That thing you saw me type on Lollipop's page

I don't give a shit about whether or not he's one of THEM, just figured I'd set things straight, much like Larry the Cable Guy, just setting it straight with you. -That guy you saw talk to LOLlipop, he's not a Label, just Paranoid.

UPDATE

That wasn't a review, and it at least wasn't a descriptive one (of anything), I was setting things straight before, and I'm setting thigns straight here, I was just responding to a thing he said to me, and I was explaining/responding to him when he talked back to me, I'm glad he at least did that. By the way, a picture of a statue peeing isn't a review, even if it's eccentric looking, which isn't that fantasticly smegging bad, but you describing stuff, as I've done, wouldn't be a sin, neither. Just thought I'd set things straight, AGAIN. Also, if you too need the link posted to you (again), here it is International Batman is Gay Day.

Still haven't lost my temper on this one (with the truthful|comedic "somehow" still at least partly in place)...

Meteo (not "Mateo", don't know who he is, thr...)

Didn't catch that, sorry. Try an American accent. (talk) 04:35, 17 April 2011

...I am, I didn't use words such as "oot" and "ab-oot". Maybe some year from now I"ll get back to you on that one, but I MIGHT have to pee out several, or even a few, bits of subjectivity first. -some guy from Penis-y Hellfuck.

I whore, therefor I am

Time to whore a 9 vote People Who Like to Fuck Naked, a page getting lost in the middle of VFH. Have you read it as yet, and if not, please drop everything on the floor and rush to read it and you will be happy for the rest of your days (if you follow the links in that "one" section). The rest of your days!!! Thanks, A 20 euro whore in a burka" 1:47 19-4-'11

AAAAAAAA (or whatever that AAA article is), thank you for your vote! What I didn't mention is that if your vote puts it over the top to be featured, this will be my 40th! That used to mean something here a long time ago (last year), before Sog and Hyperbole made 60 the new 40, but I still carry the 40 mark in my psyche as "a good thing", which is why I nommed that page. People Who Like to Fuck Naked is like my Wizard page or something, one I've tried twice before to feature, and now it's been improved enough to work. In short, thank you! Aleister 1:59 19-4-'11

No probs. (talk) 02:02, 19 April 2011