Uncyclopedia:VFH/Twister (game)

Article: Twister (game)	Score: 2 people with their nose on the red dot
Nominated by:	Aleister
For: 6	Nom nom nomfor A collab started by Sir Peeswhiz, or Sir Peesalot, or whatever his name is, and he added me and then Socky joined with his user space article, and all of our hands are on each others dots. Hey, that tickles! Aleister 00:01 9-2-'13 For. I also think MagicBus deserves credit. He added a few sections. Plus, stop sexting while you make your moves, your ass is in my face. Okay, good. Now that it's out of the way, I can speak again without it being awkward. So yeah, for. Sir Peasewhizz de New York 04:32, 9 February 2013 (UTC) For. —Sir Socky (talk) (stalk) GUN SotM UotM PMotM UotY PotM WotM 05:04, 9 February 2013 For. -- Lost Labyrinth • (t) • (c) • (a) 21:34, 10 February 2013 (UTC) For. Some very clever and helarious moments! ShabiDOO 02:18, 11 February 2013 (UTC) For. ~Sir Frosty (Talk to me!) 21:45, 15 February 2013 (UTC)
Against: 4	Limp boner. I sort of feel like I'm being beaten over the head with the central joke here. Which is decidedly not sexy. -RA HB 04:09, 11 February 2013 (UTC) Against. Per RAHB more trying to shock than actually making me giggle. Could be awesome but would need to take a more subtle approach than this to make it work. Also, saying it's for Pre-teens then having a pic of adults does not work. Mr N 10:56, Feb 11 Let me fix this when I get home in approximately 6 long, hard hours.--*Peasewhizz ♥ you! How about we talk about you, for once? Wait. We always* do that... you're beautiful! 13:31, 11 February 2013 (UTC) Nice to see people bend over backwards to accommodate me and RAHB. It's been a while. :) Talking of penis, careful if you decide to use pics of pre-teens. You might or might not get away with it depending on how you do it, and which pic you use and such. If it's a picture of some random not famous kid and the kid is still a kid today and it's an article about fucking kids it might not go down so well. Unlike most of the children in my area... Wait. Am I still typing? Anyway, if you wanted to include a picture of a kid in something like this article then I don't think anyone would complain if the kid was (for example) you (assuming you are not still a kid now) or maybe if the picture you used was of someone that you know is older now and would not / does not mind... Like your sister. Yes. Basically I'm saying upload pictures of your sister. Assuming you have asked her, or at least if you are sure that she will not find out. :) Mr N 14:14, Feb 11 I was kind of turned off by the overload of sex humor too, but this was Sir Peesalot's page and he asked me to add to it, so I went along with his premise, until the last section, which I winged and then added sex stuff to go along with the rest of the page. I'm not too proud of this page, even though, yeah. And he is still a kid now. I fear for the result. Aleister 21:41 11-2-'13 Relax. I wasn't planning on putting pictures of preteens in panties. I was gonna make it more for the teens. Geezus. And Al, please stop calling me a teen, XD I've been a teenager for quite a while. You're just sad to see me grow.--Peasewhizz ♥ you! How about we talk about you, for once? Wait. We always do that... you're beautiful! 22:35, 11 February 2013 (UTC) Against** - The jokes are there (at least in the first half) and I actually don't mind the unsubtlety, but I think (and this is really a theme in my voting run today) that many of the more intentionally shocking things just don't work at all. Rape jokes, casual use of "retarded," whatever the hell is going on in the Rhonda anecdote, etc. Also, it completely falls off rails in the second half, with two extremely unfinished sections and the aforementioned Rhonda part. ~~ S i r Ljlego , GUN [talk] 00:57, 14 February 2013 (UTC) No surprises here TKFU U U U U U U U U U U U U U U U U U U U UU U U U U U U U U U U U U U U U U U U U U CK 07:57, 18 February 2013 (UTC)