Uncyclopedia:VFH/Pac-Man (walkthrough)

VFH overview

All nominations

Feature queue

Re-feature queue

Recently featured

Recently failed

Archive

Rules

Pac-Man (walkthrough) (history, logs) (feature) (remove)

Article: Pac-Man (walkthrough)	Score: 13
Nominated by:	Sir Xam Ralco the Mediocre 00:18, October 7, 2011 (UTC)
For: 25.5	Nom and For This is just genius. I laughed hysterically through the whole article. -- Sir Xam Ralco the Mediocre 00:18, October 7, 2011 (UTC)  For. Well said. User:DJ Mixerr/sig DJ Mixerr 01:44, October 7, 2011 (UTC)  For. I finally managed to finish level 6! —Sir Socky (talk) (stalk) GUN SotM UotM PMotM UotY PotM WotM 08:25, 7 October 2011  For. Good to have such a ridiculous article once in a while. I'm taking legal actions though: the walkthrough is inaccurate. Mattsnow 14:15, October 7, 2011 (UTC) my mistake. The 377th instruction should be "left" and not "down" as written. WiiKend 14:24, October 7, 2011 (UTC) You'll get a letter from my attorneys, sir. Mattsnow 14:29, October 7, 2011 (UTC) fair enough. Here are the infos for the mailman : left right down left down up right left left left down up right right down left down up right leftdown left down up right left left down up right right down left down up right down left down up right left left down up right right down left down up right down left down up right left left down up right right down left down up right down left down up right left left down up right right down left down up right down left down up right left left down up right right down left down up right down left down up right left left down up right right down left down up right down left down up right left left down up right right down left down up right... WiiKend 15:20, October 7, 2011 (UTC) For. Hilarious concept, great execution. BTW I just noticed a stray 'n' in Level 5. Sloublues 17:32, October 7, 2011 (UTC) Corrected. Thx for the careful reading, I wrote it but I haven't red it! WiiKend 18:09, October 7, 2011 (UTC)  For. I have to vote for this for production time alone. You will trap many a noob on the roller coaster of life. Aleister 18:12 7-10-'11 For. Bwahahaha! Sir ACROLO KUN • FPW • AOTM • FA •(SPAM) 19:45, October 7, 2011 (UTC) For. --Roman Dog Bird 21:21, October 7, 2011 (UTC) For. -RAHB 22:45, October 7, 2011 (UTC) For. Whats going on with all of these creative and untypical articles this week. This is nieeeeeeeece! ShabiDOO 23:15, October 7, 2011 (UTC)  For. --EMC [TALK] 04:27 Oct 9 2011 For. It's normally the type of 'article' I would hate but I could imagine seeing this as an artwork hanging in the Tate Modern in London. RomArtus*Imperator ® (Orate) 15:28, October 9, 2011 (UTC) For. I did it and won. 72.188.110.240 22:40, October 10, 2011 (UTC) For. 71.179.188.236 00:31, October 12, 2011 (UTC) For. 71.48.200.161 03:37, October 12, 2011 (UTC) Rather obvious dickery methinks. -RAHB 04:23, October 13, 2011 (UTC) For Jenny? 03:58,13October,2011 For. enough to sucks. Go nuts! 11:10, October 13, 2011 (UTC) For. I'm tempted to write something that'll try this, but I'm too busy fixing ROS. -- monika 11:29, October 13, 2011 (UTC) For. Nonsense rocks.--FcukmanLOOS3R!!! 12:03, October 13, 2011 (UTC) For. Herostratus 06:32, October 14, 2011 (UTC) For Doesn't need anymore or any less. Is perfect as it is. mAttlobster. (hello) 15:09, October 15, 2011 (UTC) For. utterly and absolutely brilliant idea. Nikau 14:02, October 16, 2011 (UTC) For -- The Zombiebaron 23:36, October 18, 2011 (UTC) Ah, fuck it -- T​K​F​​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​UU​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​CK 19:34, October 20, 2011 (UTC) For. 70.88.206.209 14:13, October 21, 2011 (UTC) For. 169.244.3.1 16:44, October 21, 2011 (UTC)  I knew it! -- 17:05, October 21, 2011 (UTC) For. Mimo&maxus 19:17, October 21, 2011 (UTC) For. Damn. Haven't seen this many votes on a VFH Nomination before. -   TALK What's it like to be a heretic? 04:56, October 23, 2011 (UTC)
Against: 12.5	Needs more pictures T​K​F​​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​UU​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​CK 00:36, October 7, 2011 (UTC) Against. Poop poop poooooooop ~Sir Frosty (Talk to me!) 08:37, October 7, 2011 (UTC) Against. Pathetic. Not even an article Funnybony    20:17, Oct 7 20:17, October 7, 2011 (UTC) Ehhhhh. Nah. • • • Necropaxx (T) {~} Friday, 21:40, Oct 7 2011 Sorry It's amusing but let's be honest, this is just a cheesy gimmick. Featuring this will only encourage other cheesy gimmicks until the site is a big rolling ball of phallic shaped cheesy gimmickcruft - with cheese. I understand and I wish to continue. . 00:29, October 8, 2011 (UTC) You mean that hasn't already happened? -RAHB 04:18, October 8, 2011 (UTC) That last one is an artistic masterpiece, however. —Sir Socky (talk) (stalk) GUN SotM UotM PMotM UotY PotM WotM 09:22, 8 October 2011 Naw. I'll refrain from VFDing it, though. For now. 1234 ~ 05:53, 8 October 2011 I heard that piggy does not agree! Mattsnow 06:41, October 8, 2011 (UTC) Lyrithya doesn't like it so obviously it should be VFD'd. mAttlobster. (hello) 15:14, October 15, 2011 (UTC)  Against. It's difficult reading the instructions while playing Pac Man at the same time. -- PLEB SIR Lollipop (TALK) - updated on 8 October 2011, at 05:57 Needs more stuff. --EpicAwesomeness (talk) 10:11, October 8, 2011 (UTC) I have a certain respect for it, but you could do more. An opening/closing paragraph perhaps? Or more images? Black Flamingo 13:06, October 8, 2011 (UTC) Against. The problem is that the joke is too obvious, when I first went on the article I'll admit, I laughed, but the joke gets old after looking at the page for about 20 seconds. I scrolled down and thought "Is this really all there is?" In my opinion, it feels sloppy. I agree with BF in that it has potential (I reiterate I really like the concept) but it needs more work. --Writey 22:57, October 11, 2011 (UTC) Against. 96.39.161.41 00:31, October 12, 2011 (UTC) Against. It is funny, but not much variety. Needs more work and material. Naveenswiki 18:51, October 13, 2011 (UTC) For. It made me cry I mean why even try when you can do that! Furrface 1:48, October 15,2011 (UTC) Delete. I'm sorry, but it's not even funny! This article should suffer deletion. TehGrammerNazi 19:07, October 22, 2011 (UTC)
Comments	Out of curiosity, how would people feel if this had a standardish introduction that explained the game and introduced the walkthrough, either one that sounds like, say, a Wikipedia type introduction or a GameFAQs walkthrough introduction? -- monika 20:18, October 22, 2011 (UTC) I just suggested him an edit...and he said I was welcome to do so...but ultimately he seems to want the minimalism...and its a good argument. I see where you are coming from (as its not a typical uncyclopedia article) but thats probably why so many people voted for it and why so many people voted against it. Or something like that. So to speak. Somewhat. Hmm. Mieh. Pff. --ShabiDOO 20:22, October 22, 2011 (UTC) Any sort of text addition would ruin in, I say, but another minimalist picture at the end wouldn't hurt. -- T​K​F​​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​UU​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​CK 06:22, October 23, 2011 (UTC)

VFH

---

← Back to summary VFH
← Back to full VFH

Click to feature this article

Always check the feature queue first.
Note: the queue slot won't be properly filled until the {{FA}} code (with correct date) is on the article.
Just follow the instructions if you're unsure.

---