Uncyclopedia:VFH/HowTo:Write an Uncyclopedia article without reading any of the rules or directions or manuals or policies first (mostly an attempt to annoy TKF)

VFH overview

All nominations

Feature queue

Re-feature queue

Recently featured

Recently failed

Archive

Rules

HowTo:Write an Uncyclopedia article without reading any of the rules or directions or manuals or policies first (history, logs) (feature) (remove)

Article: HowTo:Write an Uncyclopedia article without reading any of the rules or directions or manuals or policies first	Score: 16 voters who didn't actually read the guide, either
Nominated by:	1234 ~ 04:27, 17 August 2011
For: 19	Self-nom and for. TKF said something the last time that made it imperative that I nominate this again. Also, let's face it, after four or five reviews I'm not really sure what to do to this anymore. I think I even tried to heed the last one before getting horribly, horribly confused, but I can't remember for sure; it's all a little fuzzy. 1234 ~ 04:27, 17 August 2011 For. ~Sir Frosty (Talk to me!) 08:03, August 17, 2011 (UTC)  For. —Sir Socky (talk) (stalk) GUN SotM UotM PMotM UotY PotM WotM 12:41, 17 August 2011 Yes. This is navelism pure and simple. How could we do this? We are going to scare away the children and this will create pandemonium. The very survival of us and this website is based on new users who will foster a sense of growth and love and this is just navelism pure and simple We will only be our own self destruction. Think of the children...think of the children...navelism will destroy our children and the future of the internet, we cannot destroy the internet with this kind of navelism. Endoscopy! ENDOSCOPY! ENDOSCOPY ENDOSCOPY ENDOSCOPY ENDOSCOPY I SAY! --ShabiDOO 15:14, August 17, 2011 (UTC) Gerbil 72.177.239.137 19:45, August 17, 2011 (UTC) For. Jmplayer 21:38, August 18, 2011 (UTC) For -- The Zombiebaron 22:11, August 18, 2011 (UTC) For I've liked this even while it was being developed and I lurkinly read it. Why it hasn't been featured is one of the inner outer mysteries of uncy. Gloop in a glass to the writer. Aleister 17:35 17-8-'11 For. OK then. EpicAwesomeness (talk) 10:00, August 20, 2011 (UTC) For. Religiously follow this. mAttlobster. (hello) 21:43, August 21, 2011 (UTC) for. Sobriety vote correction :) Mattsnow 10:51, August 22, 2011 (UTC) For. Good article, humour and all that, blah blah, bowl of porridge, pancakes. Hooray. Sir Oliphaunte (განხილვა)   11:11, August 22, 2011 (UTC) For. Dr. Fenwick 04:54, August 25, 2011 (UTC) Yeah, actually. I think it's about as good as it's going to get. All the stuff I didn't like seems to have gone, leaving only the good. Perhaps it's finally time... --Black Flamingo 02:35, August 27, 2011 (UTC) Forck you. 190.237.207.52 17:51, August 28, 2011 (UTC)  For. GREAT idea! User:DJ Mixerr/sig DJ Mixerr 18:41, August 28, 2011 (UTC)  For. Hmmmm, spose so. I understand and I wish to continue. . 09:25, August 29, 2011 (UTC)  Nice. -- Sir "TheSlyPony" Invariably certifiable. Rap sheet. [[::File:Sexy_twilight.jpeg|His shameless obsession.]] 22:21 August 29, 2011 (UTC) For! —  (talk) (contributions) 12:26, August 30, 2011 (UTC) For. -- Simsilikesims(♀UN) Talk here. 23:51, August 31, 2011 (UTC)
Against: 3	Against until 2014. Then it's good to go. T​K​F​​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​UU​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​CK 12:01, August 17, 2011 (UTC) Against. Endoscopologically not a feature. RomArtus*Imperator ® (Orate) 14:47, August 17, 2011 (UTC) no —  (talk) (contributions) 19:47, August 17, 2011 (UTC) Nah. Funky Monk 02:56, August 20, 2011 (UTC) #Against. Per Shabidoo's comment, just doesn't lead to the same vote. Hilarious! Mattsnow 04:47, August 20, 2011 (UTC)
Comments	For Shabidoo's vote. -- T​K​F​​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​UU​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​CK 18:43, August 17, 2011 (UTC)

VFH

---

← Back to summary VFH
← Back to full VFH

Click to feature this article

Always check the feature queue first.

---

Note: the queue slot won't be properly filled until the {{FA}} code (with correct date) is on the article.
Just follow the instructions if you're unsure.

---